10.04.2013 Views

Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf

Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf

Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>True</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Evident</strong><br />

8. Such essential determinations overlap. Determination is pluriserial. 22<br />

9. <strong>The</strong>re are also determinations which may be lost <strong>and</strong> replaced by o<strong>the</strong>rs without changing<br />

<strong>the</strong> essential individuality of <strong>the</strong> thing.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are called accidental. 23<br />

10. <strong>The</strong>se, too, are often pluriserial with respect to that which gives <strong>the</strong>m individual<br />

determination.<br />

11. And <strong>the</strong>se accidental determinations <strong>the</strong>mselves may often have accidental<br />

determinations of <strong>the</strong> second order, <strong>and</strong> so on. In such cases, <strong>the</strong> accidental determinations<br />

of <strong>the</strong> second order will be essential in relation to those of <strong>the</strong> first order (<strong>the</strong>y will be<br />

essential determinations of what is an accident of <strong>the</strong> first order). 24<br />

12. If a determination is an accident of anything, <strong>the</strong>n that thing is its substratum; <strong>the</strong> ultimate<br />

substratum, which is not an accident in relation to anything else, is called substance.<br />

13. <strong>The</strong> combination of specifying <strong>and</strong> individuating determinations is of a purely logical<br />

nature. None of <strong>the</strong>se determinations can disappear or change without causing each of <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs to become something different. 25<br />

<strong>The</strong> combination of that which serves as a substratum <strong>and</strong> that which is only accidental<br />

is partly logical, partly real. That is to say, <strong>the</strong> former part may continue in its individuality<br />

when <strong>the</strong> latter ceases or falls away; <strong>the</strong> converse, however, is not possible. 26<br />

14. But <strong>the</strong>re are also combinations of accidents as well as of substances which are such<br />

that any of <strong>the</strong> parts may continue after <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts cease to exist. Such combinations of<br />

parts make up collectives <strong>and</strong> whatever is continuous.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>se cases <strong>the</strong> combination of <strong>the</strong> parts is real with respect to both aspects. 27<br />

15. A group of minds or an extended body would exemplify combined realities of this sort;<br />

indeed both of <strong>the</strong>se are substances.<br />

A multiplicity of accidents of one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same substance (or of one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

accident) <strong>and</strong> a continuous accident of an unextended substance would be examples of<br />

real combinations which are <strong>the</strong>mselves accidental. 28 In <strong>the</strong> latter case, since <strong>the</strong> same<br />

substance underlies all <strong>the</strong> parts of <strong>the</strong> accident, no part of <strong>the</strong> accident can wholly fall<br />

away if <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are to be preserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!