Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
50<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>True</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Evident</strong><br />
8. Such essential determinations overlap. Determination is pluriserial. 22<br />
9. <strong>The</strong>re are also determinations which may be lost <strong>and</strong> replaced by o<strong>the</strong>rs without changing<br />
<strong>the</strong> essential individuality of <strong>the</strong> thing.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are called accidental. 23<br />
10. <strong>The</strong>se, too, are often pluriserial with respect to that which gives <strong>the</strong>m individual<br />
determination.<br />
11. And <strong>the</strong>se accidental determinations <strong>the</strong>mselves may often have accidental<br />
determinations of <strong>the</strong> second order, <strong>and</strong> so on. In such cases, <strong>the</strong> accidental determinations<br />
of <strong>the</strong> second order will be essential in relation to those of <strong>the</strong> first order (<strong>the</strong>y will be<br />
essential determinations of what is an accident of <strong>the</strong> first order). 24<br />
12. If a determination is an accident of anything, <strong>the</strong>n that thing is its substratum; <strong>the</strong> ultimate<br />
substratum, which is not an accident in relation to anything else, is called substance.<br />
13. <strong>The</strong> combination of specifying <strong>and</strong> individuating determinations is of a purely logical<br />
nature. None of <strong>the</strong>se determinations can disappear or change without causing each of <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs to become something different. 25<br />
<strong>The</strong> combination of that which serves as a substratum <strong>and</strong> that which is only accidental<br />
is partly logical, partly real. That is to say, <strong>the</strong> former part may continue in its individuality<br />
when <strong>the</strong> latter ceases or falls away; <strong>the</strong> converse, however, is not possible. 26<br />
14. But <strong>the</strong>re are also combinations of accidents as well as of substances which are such<br />
that any of <strong>the</strong> parts may continue after <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts cease to exist. Such combinations of<br />
parts make up collectives <strong>and</strong> whatever is continuous.<br />
In <strong>the</strong>se cases <strong>the</strong> combination of <strong>the</strong> parts is real with respect to both aspects. 27<br />
15. A group of minds or an extended body would exemplify combined realities of this sort;<br />
indeed both of <strong>the</strong>se are substances.<br />
A multiplicity of accidents of one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same substance (or of one <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />
accident) <strong>and</strong> a continuous accident of an unextended substance would be examples of<br />
real combinations which are <strong>the</strong>mselves accidental. 28 In <strong>the</strong> latter case, since <strong>the</strong> same<br />
substance underlies all <strong>the</strong> parts of <strong>the</strong> accident, no part of <strong>the</strong> accident can wholly fall<br />
away if <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are to be preserved.