Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
Franz Brentano_The True and the Evident.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
V<br />
CRITIQUE OF SIGWART’S<br />
THEORY OF THE EXISTENTIAL AND<br />
THE NEGATIVE JUDGEMENT<br />
(From <strong>the</strong> notes to Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis, 1889) 39<br />
Sigwart’s monograph, Die Impersonalien, attacking Miklosich, has recently appeated.*<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a penetrating criticism of <strong>the</strong> monograph by Marty in <strong>the</strong> Vierteljahrsschrift für<br />
wissenschaftliche Philosophie (Marty had previously criticized <strong>the</strong> relevant portions of<br />
Sigwart’s Logik). 40 Quite unreasonably, Sigwart seems to have been considerably annoyed.<br />
“II se fache,” as <strong>the</strong> French would say, “donc il a tort.” Steinthal burns thick clouds of<br />
incense on behalf of Sigwart in his Zeitschrift (Vol. xviii, pp. 170 ff.), <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> foreword<br />
to <strong>the</strong> fourth edition of his own Ursprung der Sprache we find him approving what any true<br />
friend of <strong>the</strong> deserving Sigwart can only regret; yet even Steinthal admits that Sigwart’s<br />
view is mistaken in its essentials. After <strong>the</strong> high praise with which he begins his review,<br />
one finds oneself somewhat disillusioned at <strong>the</strong> end. Steinthal (pp. 177–180) rejects <strong>the</strong><br />
grammatical implications of Sigwart’s <strong>the</strong>ory; hence <strong>the</strong> only real achievement of <strong>the</strong><br />
monograph would be its contribution to psychology. But psychology is not <strong>the</strong> area in<br />
which Steinthal’s estimate is authoritative. If it were, one would even have to be serious<br />
about <strong>the</strong> following remark: “On hearing <strong>the</strong> lines ‘Da bückt sich’s hinunter mit liebendem<br />
Blick’ (from Schiller’s Taucher), one can only think of <strong>the</strong> daughter of <strong>the</strong> king. It is not<br />
she who comes before <strong>the</strong> mind, however; it is only a subjectless bow or curtsey. And now<br />
I feel for her all <strong>the</strong> more. According to my [i.e., Steinthal’s] psychology, <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong><br />
king’s daughter hovers in <strong>the</strong> background, but does not enter consciousness.” <strong>The</strong> wise<br />
man knows when he has had enough.<br />
I.<br />
<strong>The</strong> limitations of Sigwart’s psychological <strong>the</strong>ory are apparent when he tries to come to<br />
terms with <strong>the</strong> concept “Existence”. Aristotle had seen that this is a concept we acquire<br />
through reflection upon <strong>the</strong> affirmative judgement.* But Sigwart, like most modern<br />
* Miklosich, Subjektlose Sätze, 2nd edn, Vienna 1883. If <strong>the</strong> reader wishes to acquaint himself<br />
with this valuable work, I may suggest that he read <strong>the</strong> notice of it which I prepared for <strong>the</strong><br />
Wiener Abendpost. Through a misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing it was published as a feuilleton in <strong>the</strong> Wiener<br />
Zeitung. Certainly no one would look for it <strong>the</strong>re, <strong>and</strong> so I include it here [in <strong>the</strong> Vom Ursprung<br />
sittlicher Erkenntnis] as an appendix. 41<br />
* <strong>The</strong> concepts of existence <strong>and</strong> non-existence are correlatives to <strong>the</strong> concepts of <strong>the</strong> truth of<br />
(simple) affirmative <strong>and</strong> negative judgements. 42 <strong>The</strong> judgement is correlative with that which<br />
is judged; <strong>the</strong> affirmative judgement with that which is judged affirmatively, <strong>the</strong> negative