The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

4.4.2 Comparison with Cross-linguistic Acquisition of Prepositions
How does the acquisition of Zapotec prepositions compare with the acquisition of
prepositions in other languages? Cross-linguistically, the first prepositions to be acquired
are 'in' and 'on', then 'under' and 'beside', then 'in front of' and 'in back of' of things that
have inherent fronts and backs, and finally 'in front of' and 'in back of' of things with no
inherent fronts or backs. Data from several languages (Table 23 below) attest to this
order (Johnston and Slobin 1979, Dromi 1979). (In this table, backF and frontF refer to
objects that have inherent fronts and backs as opposed to front and back, which refer to
objects with no inherent front or back.)
Table 23. Cross-Linguistic Order of Acquisition for Prepositions
Language* English Turkish Serbo- Italian Hebrew
Order
Croatian
1 in in on in in
on on in on on
2 under under beside under beside
beside beside under beside
3 in frontF of in frontF of in frontF of in frontF of behind
in backF of in backF of in backF of in backF of
4 in back of in back of in back of in back of under
in front of in front of in front of in front of
*The data from English, Turkish, Serbo-Croatian, and Italian is from Johnston
and Slobin (1979). The Hebrew data is from Dromi (1979).
The acquisition of BP prepositions in SLQZ is consistent with the cross-linguistic
data. The hypothesis in this thesis predicts that the BP locatives in VZ languages would
be acquired as other prepositions are cross-linguistically, and the SLQZ and SMTZ data
seem to bear out this prediction, offering further support for their classification as
prepositions.
64