10.04.2013 Views

The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

although seems to have more restrictions than the Colonial preposition. I plan to<br />

document the non-locative mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the preposition loh <strong>in</strong> future work.<br />

4.0 Child Acquisition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Body</strong> <strong>Part</strong> Terms <strong>in</strong> SLQZ<br />

This section exam<strong>in</strong>es the acquisition <strong>of</strong> BP locatives <strong>in</strong> San Lucas Quiav<strong>in</strong>í<br />

<strong>Zapotec</strong>. I wanted to explore whether the fact that the BP locatives developed from and<br />

are homophonous with body parts affects their acquisition. Do the homophony and<br />

iconicity with body parts have a facilitat<strong>in</strong>g effect on the acquisition <strong>of</strong> BP locatives?<br />

Are children sensitive to the grammatical differences between the BP locatives and the<br />

BP nouns, such as those presented <strong>in</strong> Section 2?<br />

This pilot study tested four SLQZ speak<strong>in</strong>g children (ages 1;6, 2;3, 6;4, 7;11) 11 on<br />

their knowledge <strong>of</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> both the body parts and the BP locatives us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

forced choice, picture identification task. <strong>The</strong> data suggest that the BP locatives are<br />

acquired as <strong>in</strong>dependent grammatical elements and their acquisition is not related to the<br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g body parts. Moreover, this dissociation between the<br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> the BP locatives and the body parts supports the hypothesis that the<br />

locative terms are not synchronically metaphorical extensions <strong>of</strong> the nom<strong>in</strong>al forms, as<br />

the locatives can be acquired without the BP nouns hav<strong>in</strong>g been acquired. <strong>The</strong> results are<br />

consistent with an analysis <strong>of</strong> BP locatives as prepositions.<br />

11<br />

Ages are given <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g format: years;months. For example, 1;6 stands for one<br />

year, six months old.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!