The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ... The Categorial Status of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec ...

linguistics.ucla.edu
from linguistics.ucla.edu More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

allow for some types of morpho-syntactic analysis. In addition to the documents collected by Terraciano and Sousa, there is a dictionary and a grammar written by Fr. Juan de Cordova (1578a, 1578b). These tools have been invaluable in analyzing the Colonial documents, despite many problematic features of both the dictionary and the grammar. Although the research is ongoing, we have to date analyzed 15 documents. These documents are presented in Table 10 along with the abbreviations for the documents, which will be used in the following section. These fifteen documents come from seven different pueblos and cover 188 years from 1565 to 1753. We do not know how many languages these documents represented, even in Colonial times. Table 10. Colonial Valley Zapotec Documents Document Abbreviation 1565 Zimatlán Zi565 1610 San Sebastian Tectipaque Te610 1616 San Sebastian Tectipaque Te616 1618 San Sebastian Tectipaque Te618 1626 San Sebastian Tectipaque Te626 1643 Guaxolotitlan (Huizo) Hu643 1675 Tlacochahuaya – a Tl675a 1675 Tlacochahuaya – b Tl675b 1686 Ocotlán Oc686 1694 Tlacochahuaya Tl694 1715 Ocotlán Oc715 1719 Zaachila Za719 1721 Coyotepec Co721 1740 Ocotlán Oc740 1753 Ocotlán Oc753 33

These documents have proved to be a rich source of data for the use of body part terms both as nouns and as prepositions. I collected all the examples of body part terms from our analyzed texts and present and analyze them here. Given the nature of the material, I can use the documents only to provide positive evidence. That is to say, just because we see no example of the use of a particular word in these fifteen documents does not mean the word was not being used at that time. Likewise, the absence of the use of a body part term used in a locational construction does not mean that it was not used that way at that time. And of course, we have no speakers who could judge potential sentences as ungrammatical. Nevertheless, the type of information that the positive data provides is interesting, and it adds another dimension to the discussion of the categorial status of the body part terms and possible paths of semantic and syntactic change. Of the twelve different body part terms presented in Table 3, we see examples of seven of these in the Colonial documents. Additionally, we see a complex body part term that is used in sentences dealing with possession, lachinaa 'in the hand of.' These eight words are presented below in Table 11, which shows the total number of uses of each of these terms as prepositions and as nouns. 34

<strong>The</strong>se documents have proved to be a rich source <strong>of</strong> data for the use <strong>of</strong> body part<br />

terms both as nouns and as prepositions. I collected all the examples <strong>of</strong> body part terms<br />

from our analyzed texts and present and analyze them here.<br />

Given the nature <strong>of</strong> the material, I can use the documents only to provide positive<br />

evidence. That is to say, just because we see no example <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> a particular word<br />

<strong>in</strong> these fifteen documents does not mean the word was not be<strong>in</strong>g used at that time.<br />

Likewise, the absence <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> a body part term used <strong>in</strong> a locational construction<br />

does not mean that it was not used that way at that time. And <strong>of</strong> course, we have no<br />

speakers who could judge potential sentences as ungrammatical. Nevertheless, the type<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation that the positive data provides is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, and it adds another dimension<br />

to the discussion <strong>of</strong> the categorial status <strong>of</strong> the body part terms and possible paths <strong>of</strong><br />

semantic and syntactic change.<br />

Of the twelve different body part terms presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3, we see examples <strong>of</strong><br />

seven <strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong> the Colonial documents. Additionally, we see a complex body part term<br />

that is used <strong>in</strong> sentences deal<strong>in</strong>g with possession, lach<strong>in</strong>aa '<strong>in</strong> the hand <strong>of</strong>.' <strong>The</strong>se eight<br />

words are presented below <strong>in</strong> Table 11, which shows the total number <strong>of</strong> uses <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />

these terms as prepositions and as nouns.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!