Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
- Page 19 and 20: Commentary on Matt
- Page 21 and 22: Commentary on Matt
- Page 23 and 24: Commentary on Matt
- Page 25 and 26: Commentary on Matt
- Page 27 and 28: Commentary on Matt
- Page 29 and 30: Commentary on Matt
- Page 31 and 32: Commentary on Matt
- Page 33 and 34: Commentary on Matt
- Page 35 and 36: Commentary on Matt
- Page 37 and 38: Commentary on Matt
- Page 39 and 40: Commentary on Matt
- Page 41 and 42: Commentary on Matt
- Page 43 and 44: Commentary on Matt
- Page 45 and 46: Commentary on Matt
- Page 47 and 48: Commentary on Matt
- Page 49 and 50: Commentary on Matt
- Page 51 and 52: Commentary on Matt
- Page 53 and 54: Commentary on Matt
- Page 55 and 56: Commentary on Matt
- Page 57 and 58: Commentary on Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Commentary on Matt
- Page 61 and 62: Commentary on Matt
- Page 63 and 64: Commentary on Matt
- Page 65 and 66: Commentary on Matt
- Page 67 and 68: Commentary on Matt
- Page 69: Commentary on Matt
- Page 73 and 74: Commentary on Matt
- Page 75 and 76: Commentary on Matt
- Page 77 and 78: Commentary on Matt
- Page 79 and 80: Commentary on Matt
- Page 81 and 82: Commentary on Matt
- Page 83 and 84: Commentary on Matt
- Page 85 and 86: Commentary on Matt
- Page 87 and 88: Commentary on Matt
- Page 89 and 90: Commentary on Matt
- Page 91 and 92: Commentary on Matt
- Page 93 and 94: Commentary on Matt
- Page 95 and 96: Commentary on Matt
- Page 97 and 98: Commentary on Matt
- Page 99 and 100: Commentary on Matt
- Page 101 and 102: Commentary on Matt
- Page 103 and 104: Commentary on Matt
- Page 105 and 106: Commentary on Matt
- Page 107 and 108: Commentary on Matt
- Page 109 and 110: Commentary on Matt
- Page 111 and 112: Commentary on Matt
- Page 113 and 114: Commentary on Matt
- Page 115 and 116: Commentary on Matt
- Page 117 and 118: Commentary on Matt
- Page 119 and 120: Commentary on Matt
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />
by threatening that he will be their Prophet after his resurrecti<strong>on</strong>, since they do not receive him<br />
while clothed with mortal flesh.<br />
<strong>Luke</strong> 11:30. As J<strong>on</strong>ah was a sign to the Ninevites. He declares that he will be a sign to them,<br />
as J<strong>on</strong>ah was to the inhabitants of Nineveh. But the word sign is not taken in its ordinary sense, as<br />
pointing out something, but as denoting what is widely removed from the ordinary course of nature.<br />
In this sense J<strong>on</strong>ah’s missi<strong>on</strong> was miraculous, when he was brought out of the belly of the fish, as<br />
if from the grave, to call the Ninevites to repentance. Three days and three nights This is in<br />
accordance with a well-known figure of speech. 166 As the night is an appendage to the day, or<br />
rather, as the day c<strong>on</strong>sists of two parts, light and darkness, he expresses a day by a day and a night,<br />
and where there was half a day, he puts down a whole day.<br />
<strong>Matthew</strong> 12:41. The men of Nineveh will rise in judgment. Having spoken of the Ninevites,<br />
Christ takes occasi<strong>on</strong> to show that the scribes and others, by whom his doctrine is rejected, are<br />
worse than the Ninevites were. “Ungodly men,” he says, “who never had heard a word of the true<br />
God, repented at the voice of an unknown and foreign pers<strong>on</strong> who came to them; while this country,<br />
which is the sanctuary of heavenly doctrine, hears not the S<strong>on</strong> of God, and the promised Redeemer.”<br />
Here lies the c<strong>on</strong>trast which is implied in the comparis<strong>on</strong>. We know who the Ninevites were, men<br />
altogether unaccustomed to hear prophets, and destitute of the true doctrine. J<strong>on</strong>ah had no rank to<br />
secure their respect, but was likely to be rejected as a foreigner. The Jews, <strong>on</strong> the other hand, boasted<br />
that am<strong>on</strong>g them the Word of God had its seat and habitati<strong>on</strong>. If they had beheld Christ with pure<br />
eyes, 167 they must have acknowledged, not <strong>on</strong>ly that he was a teacher sent from heaven, but that<br />
he was the Messiah, and the promised Author of Salvati<strong>on</strong>. But if that nati<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>victed of<br />
desperate ungodliness, for despising Christ while he spoke to them <strong>on</strong> earth, we are worse than all<br />
the unbelievers that ever existed, if the S<strong>on</strong> of God, now that he inhabits his sanctuary in heaven,<br />
and addresses us with a heavenly voice, does not bring us to obey him. Whether the men of Nineveh<br />
were truly and perfectly turned to God I judge it unnecessary to inquire. It is enough for the present<br />
purpose that they were so deeply affected by the teaching of J<strong>on</strong>ah, as to have their minds directed<br />
to repentance.<br />
42. The queen of the south. As Ethiopia lies in a southerly directi<strong>on</strong> from Judea, I willingly<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cur with Josephus and other writers, who assert that she was the queen of Ethiopia. In sacred<br />
history she is called the queen of Sheba, (2 Chr<strong>on</strong>icles 9:1.) We must not suppose this Sheba to be<br />
the country of Saba, which rather lay toward the east, but a town situated in Meroe, an island <strong>on</strong><br />
the Nile, which was the metropolis of the kingdom. Here, too, we must attend to the points of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trast. A woman who had not been at all educated in the school of God, was induced, by the<br />
desire of instructi<strong>on</strong>, to come from a distant regi<strong>on</strong> to Solom<strong>on</strong>, an earthly king; while the Jews,<br />
who had been instructed in the divine law, reject their highest and <strong>on</strong>ly teacher, the Prince of all<br />
166 “Quant aux trois nuits, il y a ici (cornme <strong>on</strong> scait bien) une figure que les Grecs et Latins appellent Synecdoche;” — “as to<br />
the three nights, there is here (as is well known) a figure which the Greek and Latin writers call Synecdoche.”<br />
167 “D’un oeil pur, et sans mauvaise affecti<strong>on</strong>;” — “with a pure eye, and without evil dispositi<strong>on</strong>.”<br />
65<br />
John Calvin