Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />
such a beginning, when even in the present day, while sitting at the right hand of the Father, he<br />
commissi<strong>on</strong>s from the heavenly thr<strong>on</strong>e obscure men, by whom his majesty is celebrated in a<br />
despicable manner. I do not think it probable that the branches of palm-trees were cut down, as<br />
some interpreters c<strong>on</strong>jecture, in accordance with an ancient and solemn rite appointed for that day.<br />
On the c<strong>on</strong>trary, it would seem to have been by a sudden movement of the Spirit that this h<strong>on</strong>or<br />
was rendered to Christ, when nothing of this nature had been intended by the disciples, whom the<br />
rest of the multitude imitated by doing the same thing; for this also may be inferred from the words<br />
of <strong>Luke</strong>.<br />
9. Hosanna to the S<strong>on</strong> of David. This prayer is taken from Psalm 118:25. <strong>Matthew</strong> relates<br />
expressly the Hebrew words, in order to inform us, that these applauses were not rashly bestowed<br />
<strong>on</strong> Christ, and that the disciples did not utter without c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> the prayers which came to their<br />
lips, but that they followed with reverence the form of prayer, which the Holy Spirit had prescribed<br />
to the whole Church by the mouth of the Prophet. For, though he speaks there of his own kingdom,<br />
yet there is no reas<strong>on</strong> to doubt that he principally looks, and intends others to look, to the eternal<br />
successi<strong>on</strong>, which the Lord had promised to him. He drew up a perpetual form of prayer, which<br />
would be observed, even when the wealth of the kingdom was decayed; and therefore it was a<br />
prevailing custom, that prayers for the promised redempti<strong>on</strong> were generally presented in these<br />
words. And the design of <strong>Matthew</strong> was, as we have just hinted, to quote in Hebrew a well-known<br />
psalm, for the purpose of showing that Christ was acknowledged by the multitude as a Redeemer.<br />
The pr<strong>on</strong>unciati<strong>on</strong> of the words, indeed, is somewhat changed; for it ought rather to have been<br />
written, Hoshiana, ( ) Save now, we beseech thee; but we know that it is scarcely possible to<br />
take a word from <strong>on</strong>e language into another, without making some alterati<strong>on</strong> in the sound. Nor was<br />
it <strong>on</strong>ly the ancient people whom God enjoined to pray daily for the kingdom of Christ, but the same<br />
rule is now laid down for us. And certainly, as it is the will of God to reign <strong>on</strong>ly in the pers<strong>on</strong> of<br />
his S<strong>on</strong>, when we say, May thy kingdom come, under this petiti<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>veyed the same thing which<br />
is expressed more clearly in the psalm. Besides, when we pray to God to maintain his S<strong>on</strong> as our<br />
King, we acknowledge that this kingdom was not erected by men, and is not upheld by the power<br />
of men, but remains invincible through heavenly protecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
In the name of the Lord. He is said to come in the name of God, who not <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>ducts himself,<br />
but receives the kingdom, by the command and appointment of God. This may be more certainly<br />
inferred from the words of MARK, where another exclamati<strong>on</strong> is added, Blessed be the kingdom<br />
of our father David, which cometh in the name of the Lord; for they speak thus in reference to the<br />
promises; because the Lord had testified that he would at length be a deliverer of that nati<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
had appointed as the means the restorati<strong>on</strong> of the kingdom of David. We see then that the h<strong>on</strong>or of<br />
Mediator, from whom the restorati<strong>on</strong> of all things and of salvati<strong>on</strong> was to be expected, is ascribed<br />
to Christ. Now as it was mean and uneducated men by whom the kingdom of Christ was called the<br />
kingdom of David, let us hence learn that this doctrine was at that time well known, which in the<br />
present day appears to many to be forced and harsh, because they are not well acquainted with<br />
Scripture.<br />
319<br />
John Calvin