Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
- Page 233 and 234: Commentary on Matt
- Page 235 and 236: Commentary on Matt
- Page 237 and 238: Commentary on Matt
- Page 239 and 240: Commentary on Matt
- Page 241 and 242: Commentary on Matt
- Page 243 and 244: Commentary on Matt
- Page 245 and 246: Commentary on Matt
- Page 247 and 248: Commentary on Matt
- Page 249 and 250: Commentary on Matt
- Page 251 and 252: Commentary on Matt
- Page 253 and 254: Commentary on Matt
- Page 255 and 256: Commentary on Matt
- Page 257 and 258: Commentary on Matt
- Page 259 and 260: Commentary on Matt
- Page 261 and 262: Commentary on Matt
- Page 263 and 264: Commentary on Matt
- Page 265 and 266: Commentary on Matt
- Page 267 and 268: Commentary on Matt
- Page 269 and 270: Commentary on Matt
- Page 271 and 272: Commentary on Matt
- Page 273 and 274: Commentary on Matt
- Page 275 and 276: Commentary on Matt
- Page 277 and 278: Commentary on Matt
- Page 279 and 280: Commentary on Matt
- Page 281 and 282: Commentary on Matt
- Page 283: Commentary on Matt
- Page 287 and 288: Commentary on Matt
- Page 289 and 290: Commentary on Matt
- Page 291 and 292: Commentary on Matt
- Page 293 and 294: Commentary on Matt
- Page 295 and 296: Commentary on Matt
- Page 297 and 298: Commentary on Matt
- Page 299 and 300: Commentary on Matt
- Page 301 and 302: Commentary on Matt
- Page 303 and 304: Commentary on Matt
- Page 305 and 306: Commentary on Matt
- Page 307 and 308: Commentary on Matt
- Page 309 and 310: Commentary on Matt
- Page 311 and 312: Commentary on Matt
- Page 313 and 314: Commentary on Matt
- Page 315 and 316: Commentary on Matt
- Page 317 and 318: Commentary on Matt
- Page 319 and 320: Commentary on Matt
- Page 321 and 322: Commentary on Matt
- Page 323 and 324: Commentary on Matt
- Page 325 and 326: Commentary on Matt
- Page 327 and 328: Commentary on Matt
- Page 329 and 330: Commentary on Matt
- Page 331 and 332: Commentary on Matt
- Page 333 and 334: Commentary on Matt
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />
We have no right, therefore, to deny that the keeping of the law is righteousness, by which any<br />
man who kept the law perfectly — if there were such a man — would obtain life for himself. But<br />
as we are all destitute of the glory of God, (Romans 3:23,) nothing but cursing will be found in the<br />
law; and nothing remains for us but to betake ourselves to the undeserved gift of righteousness.<br />
And therefore Paul lays down a twofold righteousness, the righteousness of the law, (Romans 10:5,)<br />
and the righteousness of faith, (Romans 10:6.) He makes the first to c<strong>on</strong>sist in works, and the<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>d, in the free grace of Christ.<br />
Hence we infer, that this reply of Christ is legal, because it was proper that the young man who<br />
inquired about the righteousness of works should first be taught that no man is accounted righteous<br />
before God unless he has fulfilled the law, 620 (which is impossible,) that, c<strong>on</strong>vinced of his weakness,<br />
he might betake himself to the assistance of faith. I acknowledge, therefore, that, as God has<br />
promised the reward of eternal life to those who keep his law, we ought to hold by this way, if the<br />
weakness of our flesh did not prevent; but Scripture teaches us, that it is through our own fault that<br />
it becomes necessary for us to receive as a gift what we cannot obtain by works. If it be objected,<br />
that it is in vain to hold out to us the righteousness which is in the law, (Romans 10:5,) which no<br />
man will ever be able to reach, I reply, since it is the first part of instructi<strong>on</strong>, by which we are led<br />
to the righteousness which is obtained by prayer, it is far from being superfluous; and, therefore,<br />
when Paul says, that the doers of the law are justified, (Romans 2:13,) he excludes all from the<br />
righteousness of the law.<br />
This passage sets aside all the inventi<strong>on</strong>s which the Papists have c<strong>on</strong>trived in order to obtain<br />
salvati<strong>on</strong>. For not <strong>on</strong>ly are they mistaken in wishing to lay God under obligati<strong>on</strong> to them by their<br />
good works, to bestow salvati<strong>on</strong> as a debt; but when they apply themselves to do what is right, they<br />
leave out of view the doctrine of the law, and attend chiefly to their pretended devoti<strong>on</strong>s, as they<br />
call them, not that they openly reject the law of God, but that they greatly prefer human traditi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
621 But what does Christ say? That the <strong>on</strong>ly worship of which God approves is that which he has<br />
prescribed; because obedience is better to him than all sacrifices, 622 (1 Samuel 15:22.) So then,<br />
while the Papists are employed in frivolous traditi<strong>on</strong>s, let every man who endeavors to regulate his<br />
life by obedience to Christ direct his whole attenti<strong>on</strong> to keep the commandments of the law.<br />
18. Thou shalt not murder It is surprising that, though Christ intended to show that we are bound<br />
to obey the whole law, he should menti<strong>on</strong> the sec<strong>on</strong>d table <strong>on</strong>ly; but he did so, because from the<br />
duties of charity the dispositi<strong>on</strong> of every man is better ascertained. Piety towards God holds, no<br />
620 “Sin<strong>on</strong> qu'il ait accompli toute la loy de poinct en poinct;” — “unless he has fulfilled all the law in every point."<br />
621 “D’autant qu’ils f<strong>on</strong>t bien plus grand cas de leurs traditi<strong>on</strong>s humaines, que des commandemens de Dieu;” — “because they<br />
set far higher value <strong>on</strong> their human traditi<strong>on</strong>s than <strong>on</strong> the commandments of God.”<br />
622 “Pource qu’il estime plus obeissance que tous les sacrifices du m<strong>on</strong>de;” — “because he esteems obedience more than all<br />
the sacrifices in the world.”<br />
278<br />
John Calvin