Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

preken.dewoesteweg.nl
from preken.dewoesteweg.nl More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 We have no right, therefore, to deny that the keeping of the law is righteousness, by which any man who kept the law perfectly — if there were such a man — would obtain life for himself. But as we are all destitute of the glory of God, (Romans 3:23,) nothing but cursing will be found in the law; and nothing remains for us but to betake ourselves to the undeserved gift of righteousness. And therefore Paul lays down a twofold righteousness, the righteousness of the law, (Romans 10:5,) and the righteousness of faith, (Romans 10:6.) He makes the first to consist in works, and the second, in the free grace of Christ. Hence we infer, that this reply of Christ is legal, because it was proper that the young man who inquired about the righteousness of works should first be taught that no man is accounted righteous before God unless he has fulfilled the law, 620 (which is impossible,) that, convinced of his weakness, he might betake himself to the assistance of faith. I acknowledge, therefore, that, as God has promised the reward of eternal life to those who keep his law, we ought to hold by this way, if the weakness of our flesh did not prevent; but Scripture teaches us, that it is through our own fault that it becomes necessary for us to receive as a gift what we cannot obtain by works. If it be objected, that it is in vain to hold out to us the righteousness which is in the law, (Romans 10:5,) which no man will ever be able to reach, I reply, since it is the first part of instruction, by which we are led to the righteousness which is obtained by prayer, it is far from being superfluous; and, therefore, when Paul says, that the doers of the law are justified, (Romans 2:13,) he excludes all from the righteousness of the law. This passage sets aside all the inventions which the Papists have contrived in order to obtain salvation. For not only are they mistaken in wishing to lay God under obligation to them by their good works, to bestow salvation as a debt; but when they apply themselves to do what is right, they leave out of view the doctrine of the law, and attend chiefly to their pretended devotions, as they call them, not that they openly reject the law of God, but that they greatly prefer human traditions. 621 But what does Christ say? That the only worship of which God approves is that which he has prescribed; because obedience is better to him than all sacrifices, 622 (1 Samuel 15:22.) So then, while the Papists are employed in frivolous traditions, let every man who endeavors to regulate his life by obedience to Christ direct his whole attention to keep the commandments of the law. 18. Thou shalt not murder It is surprising that, though Christ intended to show that we are bound to obey the whole law, he should mention the second table only; but he did so, because from the duties of charity the disposition of every man is better ascertained. Piety towards God holds, no 620 “Sinon qu'il ait accompli toute la loy de poinct en poinct;” — “unless he has fulfilled all the law in every point." 621 “D’autant qu’ils font bien plus grand cas de leurs traditions humaines, que des commandemens de Dieu;” — “because they set far higher value on their human traditions than on the commandments of God.” 622 “Pource qu’il estime plus obeissance que tous les sacrifices du monde;” — “because he esteems obedience more than all the sacrifices in the world.” 278 John Calvin

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 doubt, a higher rank; 623 but as the observation of the first table is often feigned by hypocrites, the second table is better adapted for making a scrutiny. 624 Let us know, therefore, that Christ selected those commandments in which is contained a proof of true righteousness; but by a synecdoche he takes a part for the whole. As to the circumstance of his placing that commandment last which speaks of honoring parents, it is of no consequence, for he paid no attention to the regular order. Yet it is worthy of notice, that this commandment is declared to belong to the second table, that no one may be led astray by the error of Josephus, who thought that it belonged to the first table. 625 What is added at the end, Thou shalt love thy neighbor, contains nothing different from the former commandments, but is, general explanation of them all. The young man saith to him. The law must have been dead to him, when he vainly imagined that he was so righteous; for if he had not flattered himself through hypocrisy, it was an excellent advice to him to learn humility, to contemplate his spots and blemishes in the mirror of the law. But, intoxicated with foolish confidence, he fearlessly boasts that he has discharged his duty properly from his childhood. Paul acknowledges that the same thing happened to himself, that, so long as the power of the law was unknown to him, he believed that he was alive; but that, after he knew what the law could do, a deadly wound was inflicted on him, (Romans 7:9.) So the reply of Christ, which follows, was suited to the man’s disposition. And yet Christ does not demand any thing beyond the commandments of the law, but, as the bare recital had not affected him, Christ employed other words for detecting the hidden disease of avarice. I confess that we are nowhere commanded in the law to sell all; but as the design of the law is, to bring men to self-denial, and as it expressly condemns covetousness, we see that Christ had no other object in view than to correct the false conviction of the young man. 626 for if he had known himself thoroughly, as soon as he heard the mention of the law, he would have acknowledged that he was liable to the judgment of God; but now, when the bare words of the law do not sufficiently convince him of his guilt, the inward meaning is expressed by other words. If Christ now demanded any thing beyond the commandments of the law, he would be at variance with himself. He just now taught that perfect righteousness is comprehended in the commandments of the law: how then will it agree with this to charge the law with deficiency? Besides, the protestation of Moses, (Deuteronomy 30:15,) which I formerly quoted, would be false. 623 “Vray est qu’entre les commandemens ceux qui parlent de la recognoissance que nous devons a Dieu tienent le premier degre;” — “it is true that, among the commandments, those which speak of the acknowledgment which we owe to God hold the first rank.” 624 “A faire examen pour cognoistre les personnes;” — “to make a scrutiny for knowing persons.” 625 Josephus says that there were five on each table, from which it must be inferred, that he considered the Fifth commandment as belonging to the First Table. His words are: He showed them the two tables, with the ten commandments engraven upon them, Five upon each table; and the writin was by the hand of God. — (Ant. 3. 6, 8.) — Ed. 626 “La fausse persuasion et presomption de ee ieune homme;” — “the false conviction and presumption of this young man.” 279 John Calvin

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />

We have no right, therefore, to deny that the keeping of the law is righteousness, by which any<br />

man who kept the law perfectly — if there were such a man — would obtain life for himself. But<br />

as we are all destitute of the glory of God, (Romans 3:23,) nothing but cursing will be found in the<br />

law; and nothing remains for us but to betake ourselves to the undeserved gift of righteousness.<br />

And therefore Paul lays down a twofold righteousness, the righteousness of the law, (Romans 10:5,)<br />

and the righteousness of faith, (Romans 10:6.) He makes the first to c<strong>on</strong>sist in works, and the<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>d, in the free grace of Christ.<br />

Hence we infer, that this reply of Christ is legal, because it was proper that the young man who<br />

inquired about the righteousness of works should first be taught that no man is accounted righteous<br />

before God unless he has fulfilled the law, 620 (which is impossible,) that, c<strong>on</strong>vinced of his weakness,<br />

he might betake himself to the assistance of faith. I acknowledge, therefore, that, as God has<br />

promised the reward of eternal life to those who keep his law, we ought to hold by this way, if the<br />

weakness of our flesh did not prevent; but Scripture teaches us, that it is through our own fault that<br />

it becomes necessary for us to receive as a gift what we cannot obtain by works. If it be objected,<br />

that it is in vain to hold out to us the righteousness which is in the law, (Romans 10:5,) which no<br />

man will ever be able to reach, I reply, since it is the first part of instructi<strong>on</strong>, by which we are led<br />

to the righteousness which is obtained by prayer, it is far from being superfluous; and, therefore,<br />

when Paul says, that the doers of the law are justified, (Romans 2:13,) he excludes all from the<br />

righteousness of the law.<br />

This passage sets aside all the inventi<strong>on</strong>s which the Papists have c<strong>on</strong>trived in order to obtain<br />

salvati<strong>on</strong>. For not <strong>on</strong>ly are they mistaken in wishing to lay God under obligati<strong>on</strong> to them by their<br />

good works, to bestow salvati<strong>on</strong> as a debt; but when they apply themselves to do what is right, they<br />

leave out of view the doctrine of the law, and attend chiefly to their pretended devoti<strong>on</strong>s, as they<br />

call them, not that they openly reject the law of God, but that they greatly prefer human traditi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

621 But what does Christ say? That the <strong>on</strong>ly worship of which God approves is that which he has<br />

prescribed; because obedience is better to him than all sacrifices, 622 (1 Samuel 15:22.) So then,<br />

while the Papists are employed in frivolous traditi<strong>on</strong>s, let every man who endeavors to regulate his<br />

life by obedience to Christ direct his whole attenti<strong>on</strong> to keep the commandments of the law.<br />

18. Thou shalt not murder It is surprising that, though Christ intended to show that we are bound<br />

to obey the whole law, he should menti<strong>on</strong> the sec<strong>on</strong>d table <strong>on</strong>ly; but he did so, because from the<br />

duties of charity the dispositi<strong>on</strong> of every man is better ascertained. Piety towards God holds, no<br />

620 “Sin<strong>on</strong> qu'il ait accompli toute la loy de poinct en poinct;” — “unless he has fulfilled all the law in every point."<br />

621 “D’autant qu’ils f<strong>on</strong>t bien plus grand cas de leurs traditi<strong>on</strong>s humaines, que des commandemens de Dieu;” — “because they<br />

set far higher value <strong>on</strong> their human traditi<strong>on</strong>s than <strong>on</strong> the commandments of God.”<br />

622 “Pource qu’il estime plus obeissance que tous les sacrifices du m<strong>on</strong>de;” — “because he esteems obedience more than all<br />

the sacrifices in the world.”<br />

278<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!