Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

<strong>Commentary</strong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2
that they attend sufficiently to the whole of the passage. For the discourse was occasioned by the
murmuring of the scribes, who took offense at the kindness of Christ towards wretched persons
who had led a wicked life. He therefore compares the scribes, who were swelled with presumption,
to good and modest men, who had always lived with decency and sobriety, and had honorably
supported their family; nay, even to obedient children, who throughout their whole life had patiently
submitted to their father’s control. And though they were utterly unworthy of this commendation,
yet Christ, speaking according to their belief, attributes to them, by way of concession, their
pretended holiness, as if it had been virtue; as if he had said, Though I were to grant to you what
you falsely boast of, that you have always been obedient children to God, still you ought not so
haughtily and cruelly to reject your brethren, when they repent of their wicked life.
28. Therefore his father went out. By these words he reproaches hypocrites with intolerable
pride, which makes it necessary that the Father should entreat them not to envy the compassion
manifested to their brethren. Now though God does not entreat, yet by his example he exhorts us
to bear with the faults of our brethren. And in order to take away every excuse from wicked severity,
he not only introduces hypocrites as speaking, whose false boasting might be confuted, but even
affirms that, though any man had discharged, in the most perfect manner, all the duties of piety
towards the Father, yet he has no just reason to complain because his brother obtains pardon. It is
certain, indeed, that the sincere worshippers of God are always pure and free from this malignant
disposition; but the design of Christ is, to show that it would be unjust in any man to murmur on
account of his brother having been received into favor, even though he were not inferior in holiness
to the angels.
31. Son, 544 thou art always with me. This answer consists of two parts. The first is, that the
first-born son has no reason to be angry, when he sees his brother kindly received without any loss
to himself; 545 and the second is, that, without paying any regard to his brother’s safety, he is grieved
on account of the rejoicing occasioned by his return. All my property, says he, is thine: that is,
“Though thou hast hitherto carried nothing away out of my house, it has been no loss to the for all
is reserved for thee undiminished.” 546 Besides, why art thou offended at our joy, in which thou
oughtest to have shared? for it was proper that thy brother, who we thought had been lost, should
now be congratulated on his safety and return. Those two reasons deserve our attention; for, on the
one hand, it is no loss to us, 547 if God graciously receives into favor those who had been at variance
544 “Mon enfant;” — “my child.”
545 “Veu qu’il n’y perd rien;” — “since he loses nothing by it.”
546 “Ta condition n’en est pas pire; car ie te garde tousiours ton droict entier;” — “thy condition is not the worse for it; for I
always preserve thy rights entire.”
547 “Nous n’y perdons rien;” — “we lose nothing by it.”
246
John Calvin