Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

preken.dewoesteweg.nl
from preken.dewoesteweg.nl More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 that is, to induce those who were too much the victims of sloth to become teachable and attentive; and; secondly, that their commission was temporary, for it ended when Christ himself began to preach. As the time of his death was now at hand, and as they were not yet fully prepared to testify their faith, but, on the contrary, were so weak in faith, that their confession of it would have exposed them to ridicule, the Lord enjoins them to remain silent till others shall have acknowledged him to be the conqueror of death, and till he shall have endued them with increased firmness. Matthew 16:22. And Peter, taking him aside, began to rebuke him. It is a proof of the excessive zeal of Peter, that he reproves his Master; though it would appear that the respect he entertained for him was his reason for taking him aside, because he did not venture to reprove him in presence of others. Still, it was highly presumptuous in Peter to advise our Lord to spare himself, as if he had been deficient in prudence or self-command. But so completely are men hurried on and driven headlong by inconsiderate zeal, that they do not hesitate to pass judgment on God himself, according to their own fancy. Peter views it as absurd, that the Son of God, who was to be the Redeemer of the nation, should be crucified by the elders, and that he who was the Author of life should be condemned to die. He therefore endeavors to restrain Christ from exposing himself to death. The reasoning is plausible; but we ought without hesitation to yield greater deference to the opinion of Christ than to the zeal of Peter, whatever excuse he may plead. And here we learn what estimation in the sight of God belongs to what are called good intentions. So deeply is pride rooted in the hearts of men, that they think wrong is done them, and complain, if God does not comply with every thing that they consider to be right. With what obstinacy do we see the Papists boasting of their devotions! But while they applaud themselves in this daring manner, God not only rejects what they believe to be worthy of the highest praise, but even pronounces a severe censure on its folly and wickedness. Certainly, if the feeling and judgment of the flesh be admitted, Peter’s intention was pious, or at least it looked well. And yet Christ could not have conveyed his censure in harsher or more disdainful language. Tell me, what is the meaning of that stern reply? How comes it that he who so mildly on all occasions guarded against breaking even a bruised reed, (Isaiah 42:3,) thunders so dismally against a chosen disciple? The reason is obvious, that in the person of one man he intended to restrain all from gratifying their own passions. Though the lusts of the flesh, as they resemble wild beasts, are difficult to be restrained, yet there is no beast more furious than the wisdom of the flesh. It is on this account that Christ reproves it so sharply, and bruises it, as it were, with an iron hammer, to teach us that it is only from the word of God that we ought to be wise. 23. Get thee behind me, Satan. It is idle to speculate, as some have done, about the word (ὀπίσω) behind; as if Peter were ordered to follow, and not to go before; for, in a passage which we have already considered, Luke (4:8) informs us that our Lord used those very words in repelling the attacks of Satan, and the verb ὕπαγε (from which the Latin word Apage is derived) signifies to withdraw 460 Christ therefore throws his disciple to a distance from him, because, in his inconsiderate 460 “Le mot Grec signifie simplement se reculer et s’en aller;” — “the Greek word simply means to withdraw and go away.” 210 John Calvin

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 zeal, he acted the part of Satan; for he does not simply call him adversary, but gives him the name of the devil, as an expression of the greatest abhorrence. Thou art an offense to me; for thou relishest not those things which are of God, but those which are of men. We must attend to this as the reason assigned by our Lord for sending Peter away from him. Peter was an offense to Christ, so long as he opposed his calling; for, when Peter attempted to stop the course of his Master, it was not owing to him that he did not deprive himself and all mankind of eternal salvation. This single word, therefore, shows with what care we ought to avoid every thing that withdraws us from obedience to God. And Christ opens up the original source of the whole evil, when he says that Peter relishes those things which are of men. 461 Lest we and our intentions should be sent away by our heavenly Judge to the devil, 462 let us learn not to be too much attached to our own views, but submissively to embrace whatever the Lord approves. Let the Papists now go and extol their notions to the skies. They will one day learn, when they appear before the judgment-seat of God, what is the value of their boasting, which Christ declares to be from Satan And with regard to ourselves, if we do not, of our own accord, resolve to shut ourselves out from the way of salvation by deadly obstacles, let us not desire to be wise in any other manner than from the mouth of God. 24. Then Jesus said to his disciples. As Christ saw that Peter had a dread of the cross, and that all the rest were affected in the same way, he enters into a general discourse about bearing the cross, and does not limit his address to the twelve apostles, but lays down the same law for all the godly. 463 We have already met with a statement nearly similar, (Matthew 10:38.) 464 But in that passage the apostles were only reminded of the persecution which awaited them, as soon as they should begin to discharge their office; while a general instruction is here conveyed, and the initiatory lessons, so to speak, inculcated on all who profess to believe the Gospel. If any man will come after me. These words are used for the express purpose of refuting the false views of Peter 465 Presenting himself to every one as an example of self-denial and of patience, he first shows that it was necessary for him to endure what Peter reckoned to be inconsistent with his character, and next invites every member of his body to imitate him. The words must be explained in this manner: “If any man would be my disciple, let him follow me by denying himself and taking up his cross, or, let him conform himself to my example.” The meaning is, that none can be reckoned to be the disciples of Christ unless they are true imitators of him, and are willing to pursue the same course. 461 “Que Pierre s’arreste a la sagesse de l’homme;” — “that Peter rests satisfied with the wisdom of man.” 462 “Et pourtant de peur que le Iuge celeste ne nous renvoye au diable avec nos bonnes affections et intentions;” — “and then lest our heavenly Judge should send us away to the devil with our good feelings and intentions.” 463 “A tous fideles;” — “to all believers.” 464 Harmony, vol. 1 p. 472. 465 “Pour refuter l’imagination que Pierre avoit en son corveau;” — “to refute the imagination which Peter had in his brain.” 211 John Calvin

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />

zeal, he acted the part of Satan; for he does not simply call him adversary, but gives him the name<br />

of the devil, as an expressi<strong>on</strong> of the greatest abhorrence.<br />

Thou art an offense to me; for thou relishest not those things which are of God, but those which<br />

are of men. We must attend to this as the reas<strong>on</strong> assigned by our Lord for sending Peter away from<br />

him. Peter was an offense to Christ, so l<strong>on</strong>g as he opposed his calling; for, when Peter attempted<br />

to stop the course of his Master, it was not owing to him that he did not deprive himself and all<br />

mankind of eternal salvati<strong>on</strong>. This single word, therefore, shows with what care we ought to avoid<br />

every thing that withdraws us from obedience to God. And Christ opens up the original source of<br />

the whole evil, when he says that Peter relishes those things which are of men. 461 Lest we and our<br />

intenti<strong>on</strong>s should be sent away by our heavenly Judge to the devil, 462 let us learn not to be too much<br />

attached to our own views, but submissively to embrace whatever the Lord approves. Let the Papists<br />

now go and extol their noti<strong>on</strong>s to the skies. They will <strong>on</strong>e day learn, when they appear before the<br />

judgment-seat of God, what is the value of their boasting, which Christ declares to be from Satan<br />

And with regard to ourselves, if we do not, of our own accord, resolve to shut ourselves out from<br />

the way of salvati<strong>on</strong> by deadly obstacles, let us not desire to be wise in any other manner than from<br />

the mouth of God.<br />

24. Then Jesus said to his disciples. As Christ saw that Peter had a dread of the cross, and that<br />

all the rest were affected in the same way, he enters into a general discourse about bearing the<br />

cross, and does not limit his address to the twelve apostles, but lays down the same law for all the<br />

godly. 463 We have already met with a statement nearly similar, (<strong>Matthew</strong> 10:38.) 464 But in that<br />

passage the apostles were <strong>on</strong>ly reminded of the persecuti<strong>on</strong> which awaited them, as so<strong>on</strong> as they<br />

should begin to discharge their office; while a general instructi<strong>on</strong> is here c<strong>on</strong>veyed, and the initiatory<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s, so to speak, inculcated <strong>on</strong> all who profess to believe the Gospel.<br />

If any man will come after me. These words are used for the express purpose of refuting the<br />

false views of Peter 465 Presenting himself to every <strong>on</strong>e as an example of self-denial and of patience,<br />

he first shows that it was necessary for him to endure what Peter reck<strong>on</strong>ed to be inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with<br />

his character, and next invites every member of his body to imitate him. The words must be explained<br />

in this manner: “If any man would be my disciple, let him follow me by denying himself and taking<br />

up his cross, or, let him c<strong>on</strong>form himself to my example.” The meaning is, that n<strong>on</strong>e can be reck<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

to be the disciples of Christ unless they are true imitators of him, and are willing to pursue the same<br />

course.<br />

461 “Que Pierre s’arreste a la sagesse de l’homme;” — “that Peter rests satisfied with the wisdom of man.”<br />

462 “Et pourtant de peur que le Iuge celeste ne nous renvoye au diable avec nos b<strong>on</strong>nes affecti<strong>on</strong>s et intenti<strong>on</strong>s;” — “and then<br />

lest our heavenly Judge should send us away to the devil with our good feelings and intenti<strong>on</strong>s.”<br />

463 “A tous fideles;” — “to all believers.”<br />

464 Harm<strong>on</strong>y, vol. 1 p. 472.<br />

465 “Pour refuter l’imaginati<strong>on</strong> que Pierre avoit en s<strong>on</strong> corveau;” — “to refute the imaginati<strong>on</strong> which Peter had in his brain.”<br />

211<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!