Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

preken.dewoesteweg.nl
from preken.dewoesteweg.nl More from this publisher
10.04.2013 Views

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 An now, O Israel, what doth the Lord require from thee, but that thou shouldst cleave to him with all thy heart, and with all thy soul? (Deuteronomy 10:12.) On the other hand, the traditions of men, while they set aside spiritual worship, wear a temporary disguise, as if God could be imposed upon by such deceptions; for to whatever extent outward ceremonies may be carried, they are, in the sight of God, nothing more than childish trifles, unless so far as they assist us in the exercise of true piety. We now perceive the reason why hypocrisy was viewed by Luke as equivalent to doctrines invented by men, and why he included under this name the leavens of men, which only puff up, and in the sight of God contain nothing solid, and which even draw aside the minds of men from the right study of piety to empty and insignificant ceremonies. But it will be better to abide by the narrative of Matthew, which is more copious. The disciples, after having been reproved by our Lord, came at length to understand that he had charged them to be on their guard against certain doctrine. It was plainly, therefore, the intention of Christ to fortify them against prevailing abuses, by which they were attacked on all sides. The Pharisees and Sadducees were expressly named, because those two sects maintained at that time a tyrannical sway in the Church, and held opinions so utterly subversive of the doctrine of the Law and the Prophets, that almost nothing remained pure and entire. But Herod did not in any way profess to teach; and a question arises, why does Mark class him with false teachers? Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and Of The Leaven Of Herod. I reply: he was half a Jew, was mean and treacherous, and availed himself of every contrivance that was within his reach to draw the people to his side; for it is customary with all apostates to contrive some mixture, for the purpose of establishing a new religion by which the former may be abolished. It was because he was laboring craftily to subvert the principles of true and ancient piety, and thus to give currency to a religion that would be exceedingly adapted to his tyranny, or rather because he was endeavoring to introduce some new form of Judaism, that our Lord most properly charged them to beware of his leaven. From the temple of God the scribes disseminated their errors, and the court of Herod was another workshop of Satan, in which errors of a different kind were manufactured. Thus in our own day we find that not only from Popish temples, and from the dens of sophists and monks, does Antichrist vomit out her impostures, but that there is a Theology of the Court, which lends its aid to prop up the throne of Antichrist, so that no stratagem is left untried. But as Christ opposed the evils which then prevailed, and as he aroused the minds of his followers to guard against those which were the most dangerous, let us learn from his example to make a prudent inquiry what are the abuses that may now do us injury. Sooner shall water mix with fire than any man shall succeed in reconciling the inventions of the Pope with the Gospel. Whoever desires to become honestly a disciple of Christ, must be careful to keep his mind pure from those leavens; and if he has already imbibed them, he must labor to purify himself till none of their polluting effects remain. There are restless men, on the other hand, who have endeavored in various ways 196 John Calvin

ong>Commentaryong> on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2 to corrupt sound doctrine, and, in guarding also against such impostures, believers must maintain a strict watch, that they may keep a perpetual Passover with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth, (1 Corinthians 5:8.) And as on every hand there now rages an impiety like that of Lucian, 433 a most pernicious leaven, or rather a worse than deadly poison, let them exercise this very needful caution, and apply to it all their senses. 8. Why do you think within yourselves, etc.? The disciples again show how little they had profited by the instructions of their Master, and by his wonderful works. What he had said about being on their guard against the leaven is rashly interpreted by them as if Christ intended only to withdraw them from outward intercourse. As it was customary among the Jews not to take food in company with irreligious men, the disciples imagine that the Pharisees were classed with such persons. This ignorance might perhaps have been endured; but they are forgetful of a favor which they lately received, and do not consider that Christ has the remedy his power to hinder them from being compelled to pollute themselves by meat and drink, and therefore he reproves them sharply, as they deserved. And certainly it was shameful ingratitude that, after having seen bread created out of nothing, and in such abundance as to satisfy many thousands of men, and after having seen this done twice, they are now anxious about bread, as if their Master did not always possess the same power. From these words we infer that all who have once or twice experienced the power of God, and distrust it for the future are convicted of unbelief; for it is faith that cherishes in our hearts the remembrance of the gifts of God, and faith must have been laid asleep, if we allow them to be forgotten. 12. Then they understood. The word leaven is very evidently used by Christ as contrasted with the pure and uncorrupted word of God. In a former passage, (Matthew 13:33,) Christ had used the word in a good sense, when he said that the Gospel resembled leaven; 434 but for the most part this word is employed in Scripture to denote some foreign substance, by which the native purity of any thing is impaired. In this passage, the naked truth of God, and the inventions which men contrive out of their own brain, are unquestionably the two things that are contrasted. The sophist must not 433 “L’mpiete des Lucianistes et des Atheistes;” — “the impiety of the Lucianists and Atheists.” Lucian, a celebrated Greek writer, of the second century of the Christian era, author of Dialogues of the Dead, is here alluded to as the type of scoffers and Atheists. His subject naturally led him to treat with sportive humor the solenmities of death and the future judgment; and the wit and elegance of his pen, had it been guided by ordinary caution, would have been readily — far too readily — sustained as an apology for the tone of his work. But in defiance of the ordinary feelings of mankind, he attacked so fearlessly the most sacred truths, and offended the ear of modesty by such indecent allusions, that his character as a man has been stamped with infamy. Modern times have scarcely produced so daring an infidel, with the exception perhaps of Voltaire, who took no pains to conceal his intense hatred of Christianity and of good men. Had he appeared earlier, his name might perhaps have been substituted for that of Lucian, as the representative of his class. — Ed. 434 See page 127 of this volume. 197 John Calvin

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />

to corrupt sound doctrine, and, in guarding also against such impostures, believers must maintain<br />

a strict watch, that they may keep a perpetual Passover<br />

with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth,<br />

(1 Corinthians 5:8.)<br />

And as <strong>on</strong> every hand there now rages an impiety like that of Lucian, 433 a most pernicious<br />

leaven, or rather a worse than deadly pois<strong>on</strong>, let them exercise this very needful cauti<strong>on</strong>, and apply<br />

to it all their senses.<br />

8. Why do you think within yourselves, etc.? The disciples again show how little they had profited<br />

by the instructi<strong>on</strong>s of their Master, and by his w<strong>on</strong>derful works. What he had said about being <strong>on</strong><br />

their guard against the leaven is rashly interpreted by them as if Christ intended <strong>on</strong>ly to withdraw<br />

them from outward intercourse. As it was customary am<strong>on</strong>g the Jews not to take food in company<br />

with irreligious men, the disciples imagine that the Pharisees were classed with such pers<strong>on</strong>s. This<br />

ignorance might perhaps have been endured; but they are forgetful of a favor which they lately<br />

received, and do not c<strong>on</strong>sider that Christ has the remedy his power to hinder them from being<br />

compelled to pollute themselves by meat and drink, and therefore he reproves them sharply, as they<br />

deserved. And certainly it was shameful ingratitude that, after having seen bread created out of<br />

nothing, and in such abundance as to satisfy many thousands of men, and after having seen this<br />

d<strong>on</strong>e twice, they are now anxious about bread, as if their Master did not always possess the same<br />

power. From these words we infer that all who have <strong>on</strong>ce or twice experienced the power of God,<br />

and distrust it for the future are c<strong>on</strong>victed of unbelief; for it is faith that cherishes in our hearts the<br />

remembrance of the gifts of God, and faith must have been laid asleep, if we allow them to be<br />

forgotten.<br />

12. Then they understood. The word leaven is very evidently used by Christ as c<strong>on</strong>trasted with<br />

the pure and uncorrupted word of God. In a former passage, (<strong>Matthew</strong> 13:33,) Christ had used the<br />

word in a good sense, when he said that the Gospel resembled leaven; 434 but for the most part this<br />

word is employed in Scripture to denote some foreign substance, by which the native purity of any<br />

thing is impaired. In this passage, the naked truth of God, and the inventi<strong>on</strong>s which men c<strong>on</strong>trive<br />

out of their own brain, are unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably the two things that are c<strong>on</strong>trasted. The sophist must not<br />

433 “L’mpiete des Lucianistes et des Atheistes;” — “the impiety of the Lucianists and Atheists.” Lucian, a celebrated Greek<br />

writer, of the sec<strong>on</strong>d century of the Christian era, author of Dialogues of the Dead, is here alluded to as the type of scoffers and<br />

Atheists. His subject naturally led him to treat with sportive humor the solenmities of death and the future judgment; and the wit<br />

and elegance of his pen, had it been guided by ordinary cauti<strong>on</strong>, would have been readily — far too readily — sustained as an<br />

apology for the t<strong>on</strong>e of his work. But in defiance of the ordinary feelings of mankind, he attacked so fearlessly the most sacred<br />

truths, and offended the ear of modesty by such indecent allusi<strong>on</strong>s, that his character as a man has been stamped with infamy.<br />

Modern times have scarcely produced so daring an infidel, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> perhaps of Voltaire, who took no pains to c<strong>on</strong>ceal<br />

his intense hatred of Christianity and of good men. Had he appeared earlier, his name might perhaps have been substituted for<br />

that of Lucian, as the representative of his class. — Ed.<br />

434 See page 127 of this volume.<br />

197<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!