Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf
- Page 143 and 144: Commentary on Matt
- Page 145 and 146: Commentary on Matt
- Page 147 and 148: Commentary on Matt
- Page 149 and 150: Commentary on Matt
- Page 151 and 152: Commentary on Matt
- Page 153 and 154: Commentary on Matt
- Page 155 and 156: Commentary on Matt
- Page 157 and 158: Commentary on Matt
- Page 159 and 160: Commentary on Matt
- Page 161 and 162: Commentary on Matt
- Page 163 and 164: Commentary on Matt
- Page 165 and 166: Commentary on Matt
- Page 167 and 168: Commentary on Matt
- Page 169 and 170: Commentary on Matt
- Page 171 and 172: Commentary on Matt
- Page 173 and 174: Commentary on Matt
- Page 175 and 176: Commentary on Matt
- Page 177 and 178: Commentary on Matt
- Page 179 and 180: Commentary on Matt
- Page 181 and 182: Commentary on Matt
- Page 183 and 184: Commentary on Matt
- Page 185 and 186: Commentary on Matt
- Page 187 and 188: Commentary on Matt
- Page 189 and 190: Commentary on Matt
- Page 191 and 192: Commentary on Matt
- Page 193: Commentary on Matt
- Page 197 and 198: Commentary on Matt
- Page 199 and 200: Commentary on Matt
- Page 201 and 202: Commentary on Matt
- Page 203 and 204: Commentary on Matt
- Page 205 and 206: Commentary on Matt
- Page 207 and 208: Commentary on Matt
- Page 209 and 210: Commentary on Matt
- Page 211 and 212: Commentary on Matt
- Page 213 and 214: Commentary on Matt
- Page 215 and 216: Commentary on Matt
- Page 217 and 218: Commentary on Matt
- Page 219 and 220: Commentary on Matt
- Page 221 and 222: Commentary on Matt
- Page 223 and 224: Commentary on Matt
- Page 225 and 226: Commentary on Matt
- Page 227 and 228: Commentary on Matt
- Page 229 and 230: Commentary on Matt
- Page 231 and 232: Commentary on Matt
- Page 233 and 234: Commentary on Matt
- Page 235 and 236: Commentary on Matt
- Page 237 and 238: Commentary on Matt
- Page 239 and 240: Commentary on Matt
- Page 241 and 242: Commentary on Matt
- Page 243 and 244: Commentary on Matt
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />
women and children. 39. And having sent away<br />
the multitudes, he embarked, and came to the<br />
borders of Magdala.<br />
Whence shall any man be able to satisfy those<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>s with bread in this solitary place? 5. And<br />
he asked them, How many loaves have you? And<br />
they said, Seven. 6. And he commanded the<br />
multitude to sit down <strong>on</strong> the ground; and took<br />
the seven loaves, and, when he had given thanks,<br />
brake, and gave to his disciples to set before<br />
them, and they set them before the multitude.<br />
7. And they had a few small fishes; and when he<br />
had blessed, he ordered these likewise to be set<br />
before them. 8. And they ate, and were satisfied;<br />
and of the fragments that remained they carried<br />
away seven baskets full. 9. And they that had<br />
eaten were about four thousand; and he sent them<br />
away. 10. And immediately embarking, he came<br />
with his disciples to the coasts of Dalmanutha.<br />
<strong>Matthew</strong> 15:29. And Jesus departing thence. Though it is unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably the same journey of<br />
Christ, <strong>on</strong> his return from the neighborhood of Sid<strong>on</strong>, that is related by <strong>Matthew</strong> and by <strong>Mark</strong>, yet<br />
in some points they do not quite agree. It is of little moment that the <strong>on</strong>e says he came to the borders<br />
of Magdala, and the other, that he came to the coasts of Dalmanutha; for the cities were adjacent,<br />
being situated <strong>on</strong> the lake of Gennesareth, and we need not w<strong>on</strong>der that the district which lay<br />
between them received both names. 422<br />
Decapolis was so called from its c<strong>on</strong>taining (δέκα πόλεις) ten cities; and as it was c<strong>on</strong>tiguous<br />
to Phenicia and to that part of Galilee which lay towards the sea, Christ must have passed through<br />
it, when he returned from Phenicia into Galilee of Judea. There is a greater appearance of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> in another part of the narrative, where <strong>Matthew</strong> says that our Lord cured many who<br />
labored under various diseases, while <strong>Mark</strong> takes no notice of any but of <strong>on</strong>e deaf man. But this<br />
difficulty need not detain us; for <strong>Mark</strong> selected for descripti<strong>on</strong> a miracle which was performed<br />
during the journey, and the report of which was no so<strong>on</strong>er circulated than it aroused the inhabitants<br />
of every part of that country to bring many pers<strong>on</strong>s to Christ to be cured. Now we know that the<br />
Evangelists are not anxious to relate all that Christ did, and are so far from dwelling largely <strong>on</strong><br />
miracles, that they <strong>on</strong>ly glance at a few by way of example. Besides, <strong>Mark</strong> was satisfied with<br />
422 “Est nomme maintenant de l’une, maintenant de l’autre ville;” — “was named sometimes from the <strong>on</strong>e, and sometimes<br />
from the other town.”<br />
188<br />
John Calvin