10.04.2013 Views

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong>, <strong>Mark</strong>, <strong>Luke</strong> - <strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />

42. But <strong>on</strong>e thing is necessary. Some give a very meager interpretati<strong>on</strong> of these words, as if<br />

they meant that <strong>on</strong>e sort of dish is enough. 258 Others make ingenious inquiries, but beside the<br />

purpose, about Unity. 259 But Christ had quite another design, which was, that whatever believers<br />

may undertake to do, and in whatever employments they may engage, there is <strong>on</strong>e object to which<br />

every thing ought to be referred. In a word, we do but wander to no purpose, if we do not direct all<br />

our acti<strong>on</strong>s to a fixed object. The hospitality of Martha was faulty in this respect, that she neglected<br />

the main business, and devoted herself entirely to household affairs. And yet Christ does not mean<br />

that every thing else, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of this <strong>on</strong>e thing, is of no importance, but that we must<br />

pay a proper attenti<strong>on</strong> to order, lest what is accessory—as the phrase is—become our chief c<strong>on</strong>cern.<br />

Mary hath chosen the good part. There is no comparis<strong>on</strong> here, as unskillful and mistaken<br />

interpreters dream. Christ <strong>on</strong>ly declares, that Mary is engaged in a holy and profitable employment,<br />

in which she ought not to be disturbed. “You would have a good right,” he says, “to blame your<br />

sister, if she indulged in ease, or gave herself up to trifling occupati<strong>on</strong>s, or aimed at something<br />

unsuitable to her stati<strong>on</strong>, and left to you the whole charge of the household affairs. But now, when<br />

she is properly and usefully employed in hearing, it would be an act of injustice to withdraw her<br />

from it; for an opportunity so favorable is not always in her power.” There are some, indeed, who<br />

give a different interpretati<strong>on</strong> to the latter clause, which shall not be taken away from her, as if<br />

Christ intended to say, that Mary hath chosen the good part, because the fruit of heavenly doctrine<br />

can never perish. For my own part, I have no objecti<strong>on</strong> to that opini<strong>on</strong>, but have followed the view<br />

which appeared to me to be more in accordance with Christ’s design. 260<br />

LUKE 12:13-21<br />

<strong>Luke</strong> 12:13-21<br />

13. And <strong>on</strong>e out of the multitude said to him, Master, bid my brother divide the inheritance<br />

with me. 14. And he said to him, Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you? 15. And he<br />

said to them, Take heed and beware of covetousness; for the life of any man does not c<strong>on</strong>sist in<br />

258 “Comme si Christ entendoit qu’il y a assez d’un mets, ou d’une sorte de viande;” — “as if Christ meant that <strong>on</strong>e dish, or<br />

<strong>on</strong>e sort of food, is enough.”<br />

259 “De M<strong>on</strong>ade.” — “Les autres plus subtilement, mais mal a propos, traittans ici de l’unite: comme si par ce mot de Un, Iesus<br />

Christ eust voulu exlurre tout nombre;” — “others more ingeniously, but inappropriately, treaying here of unity: as if, by the<br />

word One, Jesus Christ intended to exclude all diversity of employment.”<br />

260 Calvin appears to interpret the words, which shall not be taken from her, not as a doctrinal statement, but as a command,<br />

or, at least, as marking out the line of c<strong>on</strong>duct which ought to be pursued by Martha and others towards Mary. The good part,<br />

or, as he explains it, “the holy and profitable employment,” shall not be take, from her. “She ought not to be disturbed,” and “it<br />

would be an act of injustice to withdraw her from it.” — Ed.<br />

100<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!