Unni Cathrine Eiken February 2005

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 References Asudeh, Ash and Mary Dalrymple. (2004): Binding Theory. Working paper. Available at: www.ling.canterbury.ac.nz/personal/ asudeh/pdf/asudeh-dalrymple-binding.pdf Baldwin, Breck. (1997): CogNIAC: high precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. Proceedings of the ACL’97/EACL’97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution (Madrid), pp. 38-45. Available at http://acl.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/mirror/W/W97/index.html Botley, Simon and Tony McEnery. (2000): Discourse anaphora: The need for synthesis. Chapter 1 in Botley and McEnery (eds): Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-41. Bresnan, Joan. (2001): Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell. Carbonell, Jamie G. and Ralf D. Brown. (1988): Anaphora Resolution: A Multi-Strategy Approach. Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’88, Budapest), pp. 96-101. Available at: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/C/C88/C88-1021.pdf CognIT website (2004): http://www.cognit.no/ Consulted 23/11-2004 Copestake, A., D. Flickinger, I. Sag, C. Pollard. (2003): Minimal Recursion Semantics. An Introduction. Working paper. Available at: http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/copestake.pdf Cover, T. M. and P. E. Hart. (1967): Nearest neighbor pattern classification. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, pp. 21-27. Available at: http://yreka.stanford.edu/~cover/papers/transIT/0021cove.pdf Daelemans, Walter, A. van den Bosch and J. Zavrel. (1999): Forgetting Exceptions is Harmful in Language Learning. Machine Learning 34, special issue in natural language learning, pp. 11-43. Available at: http://ilk.kub.nl/pub/papers/harmful.ps Daelemans, Walter, J. Zavrel, K. van der Sloot, A. van den Bosch. (2003): TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 5.0, Reference Guide. ILK Technical Report 03-10. Available at: http://ilk.uvt.nl/downloads/pub/papers/ilk0310.ps.gz Dagan, Ido and Alon Itai. (1990): Automatic Processing of Large Corpora for the Resolution of Anaphora References. Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING ’90, Helsinki), pp. 330-332. Available at: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/C/C90/C90-3063.pdf Dagan, Ido, S. Marcus, S. Markovitch. (1995): Contextual word similarity and estimation from sparse data. In 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio State University, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, New Jersey, pp. 164-171. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/dagan95contextual.html 86
Firth, J. R. (1957): A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-55. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Philological Society, Oxford; reprinted in F. R. Palmer (ed.) (1968): Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952- 59. Longman, pp. 168-205. Grefenstette, Gregory. (1992): SEXTANT: Exploring unexplored contexts for semantic extraction from syntactic analysis. Proceedings, 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 324-326. Available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/grefenstette92sextant.html Harris, Zellig S. (1968). Mathematical Structures of Language. New York: Wiley. Hellan, Lars. (1988): Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. No 32 in Studies in Generative Grammar. Foris Publications, the Netherlands. Hindle, Donald. (1990): Noun classification from predicate-argument structures. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 268-275. Available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hindle90noun.html ILK website (2004): http://ilk.kub.nl/ Consulted 12/12-2004 Jurafsky, Daniel and James H. Martin. (2000): Speech and Language Processing. An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Prentice-Hall. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle. (1993): From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers (the Netherlands). KunDoc website (2004): http://www.kundoc.net/ Consulted 23/11-2004 Lin, Dekang. (1997): Using Syntactic Dependency as Local Context to Resolve Word Sense Ambiguity. In Proceedings of ACL-97 (Madrid), pp. 64-71. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/lin97using.html Lin, Dekang. (1998): Automatic Retrieval and Clustering of Similar Words. In Proceedings of COLINGACL '98 (Montreal), pp. 768-774. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/16998.html Lin, Dekang and Patrik Pantel. (2001): Induction of Semantic Classes from Natural Language Text. In Proceedings of SIGKDD-01 (San Fransisco), pp. 317-322. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/lin01induction.html Mani, Inderjeet. (2001): Automatic summarization. John Benjamins. Matthews, P. H. (1997): The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Miller, G. and C. Leacock (2000): Lexical representations for sentence processing. Chapter 8 in Y. Ravin and C. Leacock (ed.): Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches. Oxford University Press. Mitkov, Ruslan. (1999): Anaphora Resolution: The State of the Art. Working paper, University of Wolverhampton. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/mitkov99anaphora.html 87
Page 1 and 2:
University of Bergen Section for li
Page 3 and 4:
Preface The project presented in th
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AN
Page 7 and 8:
1 Introduction and problem statemen
Page 9 and 10:
patterns found in a text collection
Page 11 and 12:
The results obtained in this projec
Page 13 and 14:
The term anaphor describes a lingui
Page 15 and 16:
2.1.1.1 Discourse representation th
Page 17 and 18:
eferring to BT. The NP which is lin
Page 19 and 20:
esolution system will not be able t
Page 21 and 22:
(2- 12) REC SUBJ EXIST OBJ IND-OBJ
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1 17
Page 25 and 26:
means that the algorithm would prop
Page 27 and 28:
for an overview). Many of these sys
Page 29 and 30:
(2- 15) a. Politiet etterlyste i da
Page 31 and 32:
section. The theory dates back to t
Page 33 and 34:
2.2.2 Different types of context So
Page 35 and 36:
neighbours. For example, a target w
Page 37 and 38:
with it. Selectional constraints al
Page 39 and 40:
3 From text to EPAS - the extractio
Page 41 and 42: 3.2 Predicate-argument structures "
Page 43 and 44: speaker flexibility with regards to
Page 45 and 46: and woman occur together both in su
Page 47 and 48: occur with. Arguments which are unl
Page 49 and 50: 3.3.1 NorGram in outline Norsk komp
Page 51 and 52: Figure 3 The most useful structure
Page 53 and 54: 3.4 Altering the source As already
Page 55 and 56: (3- 12) (3- 13) Politiet leter ette
Page 57 and 58: ARG1 and ARG2 arrays display a valu
Page 59 and 60: (3- 20) Anne Slåtten bodde i et st
Page 61 and 62: value and highly desirable. As such
Page 63 and 64: this project, this can be interpret
Page 65 and 66: The process of classifying the cons
Page 67 and 68: There are several different distanc
Page 69 and 70: . ankomme,etterforsker,?,? ankomme,
Page 71 and 72: Test 2 Training set: EPAS_arg1 with
Page 73 and 74: The training and test material was
Page 75 and 76: • level 0: words which co-occur w
Page 77 and 78: (4- 9) avklare,obduksjon,? bede-om,
Page 79 and 80: (4-10) below shows the output for t
Page 81 and 82: In the introduction to this chapter
Page 83 and 84: the EPAS can be used in the classif
Page 85 and 86: exemption of jobbe-utfra, none of t
Page 87 and 88: antecedent for (4-15a). In the case
Page 89 and 90: Figure 7 Interestingly enough, howe
Page 91: When testing on knowledge-dependent
Page 95 and 96: Appendix A: Ekstraktor.pl - algorit
Page 97 and 98: finnARG2(); This function has exact
Page 99 and 100: #legger lest linje inn i @prt derso
Page 101 and 102: sub fjernEP{ #fjerner elementer fra
Page 103 and 104: } splice(@ARGx); $imax = @ARG3ep; @
Page 105 and 106: } else{ } } } push(@liste, $ARG0ep[
Page 107 and 108: 101 Appendix C: the EPAS list 23-å
Page 109 and 110: 103 obdusere,,kvinne observere,,23-
Page 111 and 112: Appendix D: Text aligned with EPAS
Page 113 and 114: eventualiteter. Vi varslet Kripos.
Page 115 and 116: Etterforskerne har flere observasjo
Page 117 and 118: # Subrutine som tar inn argumentnum
Page 119 and 120: Appendix F: POS-based structures SE
Page 121: Vi har ingen spesiell teori som vi
show all

Unni Cathrine Eiken February 2005

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?