to open next chapter. - NASA's History Office
to open next chapter. - NASA's History Office
to open next chapter. - NASA's History Office
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
What Is Peenemünde?<br />
<strong>to</strong>r using graphite and uranium, in other words, the same type of reac<strong>to</strong>r as<br />
the first operating reac<strong>to</strong>r in the world, which the Americans created two<br />
years later . . .<br />
As far as one can tell from the published research, neither Russian nor American<br />
postwar researchers have fully appreciated how the Peenemünde rocketeers’<br />
invention of graphite control surfaces saved humankind.The Germans were forced<br />
<strong>to</strong> use up their extremely limited s<strong>to</strong>res of pure graphite.<br />
in august 1945, when we were in Thuringia, we heard on the radio about the<br />
dropping of a<strong>to</strong>mic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We first of all tried <strong>to</strong><br />
understand what they were talking about.<br />
There were no Soviet specialists among us at that time who had the slightest<br />
involvement in a<strong>to</strong>mic research. Nevertheless, our knowledge of physics helped<br />
us, in a group discussion, <strong>to</strong> assume that the Americans had succeeded in creating<br />
a bomb by converting part of the mass of a substance in<strong>to</strong> energy, in accordance<br />
with Einstein’s famous formula: E = mc 2 .There and then, we started <strong>to</strong> question<br />
Helmut Gröttrup about what had been known in Peenemünde regarding<br />
German work on the creation of an a<strong>to</strong>mic bomb. To what extent were the<br />
German direc<strong>to</strong>rs of the long-range missile program—in particular Dornberger,<br />
von Braun, or their closest assistants—familiar with the possibilities of creating an<br />
a<strong>to</strong>mic bomb? Long conversations with Gröttrup enabled us <strong>to</strong> understand that<br />
work on some sort of super-powerful explosive had been conducted in Germany.<br />
Gröttrup was well acquainted with the names Heisenberg and von Ardenne,<br />
which I mentioned as possible scientists who could have been working on an<br />
a<strong>to</strong>mic bomb. Moreover, he said that in the summer of 1943 the Peenemünde<br />
direc<strong>to</strong>rs had, under great secrecy, talked about some new powerful explosive. For<br />
the specialists at Peenemünde this was very important.They unders<strong>to</strong>od that the<br />
ordinary TNT used in A-4 warheads—in quantities of 700–800 kilograms per<br />
warhead—would produce an effect no greater than a conventional 1,000 kilogram<br />
bomb dropped from an airplane.<br />
British and American aviation had already dropped countless such bombs on<br />
German cities. Nevertheless, Germany had continued <strong>to</strong> fight and had even<br />
expanded its development of new weapons. Gröttrup recalled that he had heard<br />
about the new explosive when von Braun had been sent <strong>to</strong> Berlin <strong>to</strong> consult<br />
with the infantry command about the prospects of increasing the power of<br />
missile warheads.<br />
Upon his return, von Braun did not say with whom he had met in Berlin.<br />
Gröttrup, smiling, recalled that it had been nice <strong>to</strong> hear from his boss that the theoretical<br />
physicists, despite the very interesting problem they were working on, had<br />
absolutely no engineering experience—in contrast <strong>to</strong> the missile specialists, they<br />
could not imagine how they needed <strong>to</strong> organize their work in order <strong>to</strong> transition<br />
from naked theory <strong>to</strong> “living” objects.<br />
249