Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
09.04.2013 Views

would become a two-year campaign lobbying the States General to provide military support to end the Portuguese revolt in Brazil. 160 This work touched on a number of aspects of the company's business, but especially on issues relating to investors, the company’s colonies, and relations with Portugal and Spain. The first of these areas of engagement was probably no more than a reflection of De Laet’s considerable personal stake in the company, but the other two recognized and put to practical use his geographical and historical knowledge and his impressive linguistic abilities. 161 This range and depth of involvement made De Laet an excellent diplomat for the company, not only at home, but also abroad. In June 1641, shortly after the Spanish had destroyed the Providence Island Company's Caribbean colony, De Laet was approached by Sir Thomas Roe, Robert Rich, and other wealthy Englishmen to provide Parliament with advice on establishing an English West India Company on the Dutch model. 162 The onset of England’s Civil War prevented De Laet from formally addressing Parliament, and such a company never got off the ground, but De Laet’s correspondence from London makes clear that he did not think this group of English aristocrats were up to the task, being “not sufficiently aware of the things which are required for the proper establishment of a company of this sort, nor do they understand exactly how much money is needed.” 163 For potential allies as well colleagues within the Dutch Republic, De Laet’s intimate knowledge of the company’s history and structure made him the ideal person to represent its interests at the highest levels of government. 























































 160 NA 1.01.07, inv.nr. 12564.17. 161 Bremmer Jr., “The Correspondence of Johannes de Laet as a Mirror on His Life”; Bremmer Jr., “‘Mine is Bigger than Yours’: The Anglo-Saxon Collection of Johannes de Laet and Sir Simonds D’Ewes.” 162 British Library Add Ms 6395, fol. 120, Johannes de Laet to William Boswell, June 18, 1641. See also Bekkers, “Introduction”; Bremmer Jr., “‘Mine is Bigger than Yours’: The Anglo-Saxon Collection of Johannes de Laet (1581-1649) and Sir Simonds D’Ewes (1602-50)”; Appleby, “An Association for the West Indies? English Plans for a West India Company 1621-29”; Kupperman, Providence Island, 1630-1641, 343. 163 British Library Add Ms 6395, fol. 120, Johannes de Laet to William Boswell, June 18, 1641. The translation is by John Kuhner. 
 87

De Laet’s presence at the meetings of the Heren XIX in Middelburg in September 1645 represented a continuation along this trajectory. He spent much of 1643 and the first several months of 1644 composing the Iaerlyck Verhael, a book whose dry detail and chronological organization reflect what must have been many hours among the ships journals, memoranda, and other documents stored in the Amsterdam chamber’s archives. When this book was published, in November 1644, De Laet was back in Amsterdam attending the fall meetings of the Heren XIX helping to draft a new set of regulations for private trade within the areas covered by the company’s charter. 164 As we have seen, De Laet was again selected to represent Amsterdam for the meetings in Middelburg, where he was on the committee tasked with developing a response to the news of the revolt in Brazil. As part of this effort, he began another project: to collect, synthesize, and prepare for the States General evidence that the King of Portugal had provided assistance to the rebels, in defiance of the terms of the 1641 Treaty. By September 18, 1645 Francisco De Sousa Coutinho (1597-1660), the Portuguese ambassador at The Hague, already was warning that the rumors had shifted from speaking of an uprising to speculation that the Portuguese governor in Bahia was responsible for supporting the rebels. 165 This information came first from Paris, where it was reported that the King of Portugal claimed to be “master of Pernambuco” once again, and had requested that France intercede with the Dutch Republic on Portugal's behalf. According to Jan Louys, who wrote the States General from Middelburg, the news was consistent with the contents of “many private letters” from Portugal itself. 166 This information was crucial, both for the bleak picture it painted of events in Brazil since the end of June, the date of the last generale missiven, and because it strongly 























































 164 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5757, entry for September 19, 1644. 165 Coutinho, Correspondência Diplomática de Francisco de Sousa Coutinho Durante a sua Embaixada em Holanda, 310. Sousa Coutinho to Conde da Vidigueira, September 18, 1645. 166 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5758, Extract uyt een brief van Louys dato 23 September 1645; NA 3.01.04.01, inv.nr. 77, Resolutions of the States of Holland, October 3, 1645. 
 88

would become a two-year campaign lobbying the St<strong>at</strong>es General to provide military support to<br />

end the Portuguese revolt in Brazil. 160<br />

This work touched on a number of aspects of the company's business, but especially on<br />

issues rel<strong>at</strong>ing to investors, the company’s colonies, and rel<strong>at</strong>ions with Portugal and Spain. The<br />

first of these areas of engagement was probably no more than a reflection of De Laet’s<br />

considerable personal stake in the company, but the other two recognized and put to practical use<br />

his geographical and historical knowledge and his impressive linguistic abilities. 161 This range<br />

and depth of involvement made De Laet an excellent diplom<strong>at</strong> for the company, not only <strong>at</strong><br />

home, but also abroad. In June 1641, shortly after the Spanish had destroyed the Providence<br />

Island Company's Caribbean colony, De Laet was approached by Sir Thomas Roe, Robert Rich,<br />

and other wealthy Englishmen to provide Parliament with advice on establishing an English<br />

West India Company on the Dutch model. 162 The onset of England’s Civil War prevented De<br />

Laet from formally addressing Parliament, and such a company never got off the ground, but De<br />

Laet’s correspondence from London makes clear th<strong>at</strong> he did not think this group of English<br />

aristocr<strong>at</strong>s were up to the task, being “not sufficiently aware of the things which are required for<br />

the proper establishment of a company of this sort, nor do they understand exactly how much<br />

money is needed.” 163 For potential allies as well colleagues within the Dutch Republic, De Laet’s<br />

intim<strong>at</strong>e knowledge of the company’s history and structure made him the ideal person to<br />

represent its interests <strong>at</strong> the highest levels of government.<br />

























































<br />

160 NA 1.01.07, inv.nr. 1<strong>25</strong>64.17.<br />

161 Bremmer Jr., “The Correspondence of Johannes de Laet as a Mirror on His Life”; Bremmer Jr., “‘Mine is Bigger<br />

than Yours’: The Anglo-Saxon Collection of Johannes de Laet and Sir Simonds D’Ewes.”<br />

162 British Library Add Ms 6395, fol. 120, Johannes de Laet to William Boswell, June 18, 1641. See also Bekkers,<br />

“Introduction”; Bremmer Jr., “‘Mine is Bigger than Yours’: The Anglo-Saxon Collection of Johannes de Laet<br />

(1581-1649) and Sir Simonds D’Ewes (1602-50)”; Appleby, “An Associ<strong>at</strong>ion for the West Indies? English Plans for<br />

a West India Company 1621-29”; Kupperman, Providence Island, 1630-1641, 343.<br />

163 British Library Add Ms 6395, fol. 120, Johannes de Laet to William Boswell, June 18, 1641. The transl<strong>at</strong>ion is<br />

by John Kuhner.<br />


 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!