Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
09.04.2013 Views

Overall, this meant an annual profit of 124,800 guilders, a fraction of the profits from Brazil or Guinea and considerably less than the company had anticipated. But there may have been more to this than meets the eye: Specx’s figures assumed that the slave trade remained a company monopoly, but he used a very low estimate for the sale price of slaves, which Van der Hagen's report showed had varied between 204 and 357 guilders apiece. 48 Separate sets of calculations, also in Specx’s possession, used the higher figure of 200 guilders. One, probably composed in 1644, argued that an open and free trade of 12,000 slaves each year would yield a much more attractive annual profit to the company of 720,000 guilders in recognitie and fees. 49 Another set of calculations, almost certainly drafted by an opponent of opening the trade, estimated that 10,000 slaves would yield recognitie and fees worth 540,000 guilders, but that this income would be offset by expenses on the coast equal to 408,400 guilders, for an overall profit of only 131,600 guilders. 50 The implication was that the high fixed costs of the slave trade, including forts and soldiers in Loanda, made it disadvantageous for the company to open the trade to private merchants. If the company kept the trade to itself, however, this author believed it could earn 1.8 million guilders against expenses of 910,000 guilders, for a profit of 990,000 guilders. 51 That these numbers diverge so widely—in terms of the number of slaves traded, the sale price in Recife, and fixed costs in Angola—provides some indication of the fluidity of the market and the wide margin of error that could be expected from this sort of calculation. Specx was careful to use a reliable figure for the volume of the trade, but his price estimates, along with his 























































 48 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fol. 224. Van den Boogaart and Emmer report that sale prices in Recife for slaves from Angola varied from a low of 161 guilders in 1636 to a high of 639 guilders in 1638. In 1644 the price was 172 guilders and in 1645 it was 244 guilders. See Van den Boogaart and Emmer, “The Dutch Participation in the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1596-1650,” 371. 49 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calculatie van de Incomptsten ende Lasten van Brasil, ende Incompsten nu ter tydt Instato, fol. 121v. 50 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calculatie van de Proffyten die den open handel op Angola soude geven. fol. 142v. 51 Ibid., fol. 144. 
 237

notes on these documents, suggest that we should count him among the advocates for lifting the company’s monopoly on the slave trade. 52 Specx devoted little attention to calculations for the region around the River Gambia, recording only that expenses of 125,000 guilders, mostly for trade goods and ships, were rewarded with revenues of 200,000 guilders, for a tidy profit of 75,000 guilders. 53 But he paid much closer attention to the island of São Tomé, the company's most recent conquest and a trade hub within the South Atlantic. 54 A major producer of sugar under the Portuguese throughout the sixteenth century, by this time the island was becoming a transit point for slaves. Unlike the other regions, Specx calculated the costs of the trade in terms of slaves, cotton, and gold, all of which could be exchanged for sugar. By trading goods valued at 94,060 guilders, plus expenses of 73,600 guilders for 220 soldiers and support personnel, he expected the company to take away 541,200 guilders worth of sugar. 55 This was already the highest rate of profit of any of the conquest areas, and Specx believed it could be made even more profitable by planting indigo, tobacco, and East Indian pepper. Even more important, though—and perhaps drawing on his experience with the VOC, which had supplemented both its income and its access to silver by facilitating the vast and profitable intra-Asia trade—he imagined that São Tomé might one day serve as a staple-market for all of West Africa. 56 The accumulated annual profits from all five conquests amounted to just less than 3 million guilders. Against this figure Specx counted the company's overhead in the Netherlands, 























































 52 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fols. 123-127, fol. 186, fols. 187-190. 53 Ibid., fols. 118v and 119. 54 Den Heijer, Goud, Ivoor en Slaven. See also Stuart B. Schwartz, ed., Tropical Babylons: Sugar and the Making of the Atlantic World, 1450-1680 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004). 55 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fols. 118v-119v. 56 Ratelband, Nederlanders in West-Afrika 1600-1650; Gaastra, The Dutch East India Company. 
 238

Overall, this meant an annual profit of 124,800 guilders, a fraction of the profits from<br />

Brazil or Guinea and considerably less than the company had anticip<strong>at</strong>ed. But there may have<br />

been more to this than meets the eye: Specx’s figures assumed th<strong>at</strong> the slave trade remained a<br />

company monopoly, but he used a very low estim<strong>at</strong>e for the sale price of slaves, which Van der<br />

Hagen's report showed had varied between 204 and 357 guilders apiece. 48 Separ<strong>at</strong>e sets of<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, also in Specx’s possession, used the higher figure of 200 guilders. One, probably<br />

composed in 1644, argued th<strong>at</strong> an open and free trade of 12,000 slaves each year would yield a<br />

much more <strong>at</strong>tractive annual profit to the company of 720,000 guilders in recognitie and fees. 49<br />

Another set of calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, almost certainly drafted by an opponent of opening the trade,<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> 10,000 slaves would yield recognitie and fees worth 540,000 guilders, but th<strong>at</strong> this<br />

income would be offset by expenses on the coast equal to 408,400 guilders, for an overall profit<br />

of only 131,600 guilders. 50 The implic<strong>at</strong>ion was th<strong>at</strong> the high fixed costs of the slave trade,<br />

including forts and soldiers in Loanda, made it disadvantageous for the company to open the<br />

trade to priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants. If the company kept the trade to itself, however, this author believed<br />

it could earn 1.8 million guilders against expenses of 910,000 guilders, for a profit of 990,000<br />

guilders. 51<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> these numbers diverge so widely—in terms of the number of slaves traded, the sale<br />

price in Recife, and fixed costs in Angola—provides some indic<strong>at</strong>ion of the fluidity of the market<br />

and the wide margin of error th<strong>at</strong> could be expected from this sort of calcul<strong>at</strong>ion. Specx was<br />

careful to use a reliable figure for the volume of the trade, but his price estim<strong>at</strong>es, along with his<br />

























































<br />

48<br />

NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fol. 224. Van den Boogaart and Emmer report th<strong>at</strong> sale prices in Recife for slaves from<br />

Angola varied from a low of 161 guilders in 1636 to a high of 639 guilders in 1638. In 1644 the price was 172<br />

guilders and in 1645 it was 244 guilders. See Van den Boogaart and Emmer, “The Dutch Particip<strong>at</strong>ion in the<br />

Atlantic Slave Trade, 1596-1650,” 371.<br />

49<br />

NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calcul<strong>at</strong>ie van de Incomptsten ende Lasten van Brasil, ende Incompsten nu ter tydt Inst<strong>at</strong>o,<br />

fol. 121v.<br />

50<br />

NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calcul<strong>at</strong>ie van de Proffyten die den open handel op Angola soude geven. fol. 142v.<br />

51 Ibid., fol. 144.<br />


 237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!