Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Overall, this meant an annual profit of 124,800 guilders, a fraction of the profits from Brazil or Guinea and considerably less than the company had anticipated. But there may have been more to this than meets the eye: Specx’s figures assumed that the slave trade remained a company monopoly, but he used a very low estimate for the sale price of slaves, which Van der Hagen's report showed had varied between 204 and 357 guilders apiece. 48 Separate sets of calculations, also in Specx’s possession, used the higher figure of 200 guilders. One, probably composed in 1644, argued that an open and free trade of 12,000 slaves each year would yield a much more attractive annual profit to the company of 720,000 guilders in recognitie and fees. 49 Another set of calculations, almost certainly drafted by an opponent of opening the trade, estimated that 10,000 slaves would yield recognitie and fees worth 540,000 guilders, but that this income would be offset by expenses on the coast equal to 408,400 guilders, for an overall profit of only 131,600 guilders. 50 The implication was that the high fixed costs of the slave trade, including forts and soldiers in Loanda, made it disadvantageous for the company to open the trade to private merchants. If the company kept the trade to itself, however, this author believed it could earn 1.8 million guilders against expenses of 910,000 guilders, for a profit of 990,000 guilders. 51 That these numbers diverge so widely—in terms of the number of slaves traded, the sale price in Recife, and fixed costs in Angola—provides some indication of the fluidity of the market and the wide margin of error that could be expected from this sort of calculation. Specx was careful to use a reliable figure for the volume of the trade, but his price estimates, along with his 48 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fol. 224. Van den Boogaart and Emmer report that sale prices in Recife for slaves from Angola varied from a low of 161 guilders in 1636 to a high of 639 guilders in 1638. In 1644 the price was 172 guilders and in 1645 it was 244 guilders. See Van den Boogaart and Emmer, “The Dutch Participation in the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1596-1650,” 371. 49 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calculatie van de Incomptsten ende Lasten van Brasil, ende Incompsten nu ter tydt Instato, fol. 121v. 50 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calculatie van de Proffyten die den open handel op Angola soude geven. fol. 142v. 51 Ibid., fol. 144. 237
notes on these documents, suggest that we should count him among the advocates for lifting the company’s monopoly on the slave trade. 52 Specx devoted little attention to calculations for the region around the River Gambia, recording only that expenses of 125,000 guilders, mostly for trade goods and ships, were rewarded with revenues of 200,000 guilders, for a tidy profit of 75,000 guilders. 53 But he paid much closer attention to the island of São Tomé, the company's most recent conquest and a trade hub within the South Atlantic. 54 A major producer of sugar under the Portuguese throughout the sixteenth century, by this time the island was becoming a transit point for slaves. Unlike the other regions, Specx calculated the costs of the trade in terms of slaves, cotton, and gold, all of which could be exchanged for sugar. By trading goods valued at 94,060 guilders, plus expenses of 73,600 guilders for 220 soldiers and support personnel, he expected the company to take away 541,200 guilders worth of sugar. 55 This was already the highest rate of profit of any of the conquest areas, and Specx believed it could be made even more profitable by planting indigo, tobacco, and East Indian pepper. Even more important, though—and perhaps drawing on his experience with the VOC, which had supplemented both its income and its access to silver by facilitating the vast and profitable intra-Asia trade—he imagined that São Tomé might one day serve as a staple-market for all of West Africa. 56 The accumulated annual profits from all five conquests amounted to just less than 3 million guilders. Against this figure Specx counted the company's overhead in the Netherlands, 52 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fols. 123-127, fol. 186, fols. 187-190. 53 Ibid., fols. 118v and 119. 54 Den Heijer, Goud, Ivoor en Slaven. See also Stuart B. Schwartz, ed., Tropical Babylons: Sugar and the Making of the Atlantic World, 1450-1680 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004). 55 NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fols. 118v-119v. 56 Ratelband, Nederlanders in West-Afrika 1600-1650; Gaastra, The Dutch East India Company. 238
- Page 197 and 198: With the verhoging stalled, and ani
- Page 199 and 200: e handled without gloves.” 55 In
- Page 201 and 202: “walking the land half-naked” f
- Page 203 and 204: While the resolution as a whole sho
- Page 205 and 206: along with the two powerful Amsterd
- Page 207 and 208: Cornelis Melijn, of a patroonschap
- Page 209 and 210: this measure, he said, “no one in
- Page 211 and 212: maintaining the company's solvency,
- Page 213 and 214: colony, overestimated the number of
- Page 215 and 216: And Maurits offered another argumen
- Page 217 and 218: Stellingwerf, who sat in the States
- Page 219 and 220: Provinces, plus smaller fees of 3%
- Page 221 and 222: exclude private merchants from the
- Page 223 and 224: clamoring for slaves. 136 The probl
- Page 225 and 226: expedition's success, along with de
- Page 227 and 228: trading locations on the Gold Coast
- Page 229 and 230: directly from New Netherland, and s
- Page 231 and 232: over trade was simply the projectio
- Page 233 and 234: the area in which the company was b
- Page 235 and 236: had not yet been renewed. 4 As the
- Page 237 and 238: to the Dutch state, and that this d
- Page 239 and 240: ookkeeping from late-fifteenth cent
- Page 241 and 242: ambitions. 21 Although neither Spec
- Page 243 and 244: expenses at each of the company's c
- Page 245 and 246: included. 34 In Specx’s estimatio
- Page 247: calculations yielded a profit of 41
- Page 251 and 252: It was, of course, a fiction. With
- Page 253 and 254: to hang from the body [...] This sh
- Page 255 and 256: van West-Indien (New World, or a De
- Page 257 and 258: title page of the revised edition a
- Page 259 and 260: It occurred to me that these miracu
- Page 261 and 262: third in the Kort Verhael. This rep
- Page 263 and 264: This extraordinary conclusion might
- Page 265 and 266: enemy” and the positive effects o
- Page 267 and 268: appeared in the late 1630s in the c
- Page 269 and 270: versus settlement. He was also more
- Page 271 and 272: An exceptionally cold winter delaye
- Page 273 and 274: failure of Dutch imperialism from t
- Page 275 and 276: that focuses on political and imper
- Page 277 and 278: support to the WIC, but they also i
- Page 279 and 280: Maurits predicted and which was not
- Page 281 and 282: British Library Additional Manuscri
- Page 283 and 284: Burke, Peter. A Social History of K
- Page 285 and 286: Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An
- Page 287 and 288: Jonge, J. K. J. De Oorsprong van Ne
- Page 289 and 290: Noorlander, Danny L. “Serving God
- Page 291 and 292: Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Na
- Page 293: 1624-1654, edited by Marianne L. Wi
Overall, this meant an annual profit of 124,800 guilders, a fraction of the profits from<br />
Brazil or Guinea and considerably less than the company had anticip<strong>at</strong>ed. But there may have<br />
been more to this than meets the eye: Specx’s figures assumed th<strong>at</strong> the slave trade remained a<br />
company monopoly, but he used a very low estim<strong>at</strong>e for the sale price of slaves, which Van der<br />
Hagen's report showed had varied between 204 and 357 guilders apiece. 48 Separ<strong>at</strong>e sets of<br />
calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, also in Specx’s possession, used the higher figure of 200 guilders. One, probably<br />
composed in 1644, argued th<strong>at</strong> an open and free trade of 12,000 slaves each year would yield a<br />
much more <strong>at</strong>tractive annual profit to the company of 720,000 guilders in recognitie and fees. 49<br />
Another set of calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, almost certainly drafted by an opponent of opening the trade,<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> 10,000 slaves would yield recognitie and fees worth 540,000 guilders, but th<strong>at</strong> this<br />
income would be offset by expenses on the coast equal to 408,400 guilders, for an overall profit<br />
of only 131,600 guilders. 50 The implic<strong>at</strong>ion was th<strong>at</strong> the high fixed costs of the slave trade,<br />
including forts and soldiers in Loanda, made it disadvantageous for the company to open the<br />
trade to priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants. If the company kept the trade to itself, however, this author believed<br />
it could earn 1.8 million guilders against expenses of 910,000 guilders, for a profit of 990,000<br />
guilders. 51<br />
Th<strong>at</strong> these numbers diverge so widely—in terms of the number of slaves traded, the sale<br />
price in Recife, and fixed costs in Angola—provides some indic<strong>at</strong>ion of the fluidity of the market<br />
and the wide margin of error th<strong>at</strong> could be expected from this sort of calcul<strong>at</strong>ion. Specx was<br />
careful to use a reliable figure for the volume of the trade, but his price estim<strong>at</strong>es, along with his<br />
<br />
48<br />
NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8, fol. 224. Van den Boogaart and Emmer report th<strong>at</strong> sale prices in Recife for slaves from<br />
Angola varied from a low of 161 guilders in 1636 to a high of 639 guilders in 1638. In 1644 the price was 172<br />
guilders and in 1645 it was 244 guilders. See Van den Boogaart and Emmer, “The Dutch Particip<strong>at</strong>ion in the<br />
Atlantic Slave Trade, 1596-1650,” 371.<br />
49<br />
NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calcul<strong>at</strong>ie van de Incomptsten ende Lasten van Brasil, ende Incompsten nu ter tydt Inst<strong>at</strong>o,<br />
fol. 121v.<br />
50<br />
NA 1.10.78, inv.nr. 8. Calcul<strong>at</strong>ie van de Proffyten die den open handel op Angola soude geven. fol. 142v.<br />
51 Ibid., fol. 144.<br />
237