Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
and Philips Serooskerken. 58 The recognition fees that the company collected on goods shipped by private traders were welcome, the letter argued, but they were tiny in comparison to the profits of the trade itself. The only way to secure a greater portion of these profits would be to close the trade. In his separate letter, Serooskerken, a Zeelander, expressed the frustration and indignation aroused by the activities of the private traders. While the company was obliged to maintain the army and its own servants—as well the forts, warehouses, and living quarters—the private traders were making a fortune on the trade in sugar and provisions. Not only did this give them an unfair advantage, Serooskerken reasoned, but it led to price inflation, since the private traders simply added to the price of the goods they sold the recognition fees they paid to the company, plus 100-200% in profits. In Recife the price for houses, many of which were still dilapidated as a result of the war, had increased as much as sevenfold. As a result, many in the colony—and especially the company's soldiers and menial servants—had fallen deeply in debt. The private trade, Serooskerken concluded, was “eating the company like a worm.” 59 Jan Robberts, another company official, qualified his remarks as based solely on “my personal sentiments,” but the recommendations he offered were almost exactly the same. 60 The private traders, he wrote, were “no friends of the company,” but rather men who in every instance placed their own particular interests above those of either company or fatherland. 61 He echoed Serooskerken's reports on the poor state of the company's warehouses and the rapid rise in prices, which he blamed for the “thousands” of company soldiers that could be found 58 NA 1.01.07, inv.nr. 12564.5. Extracts from the letter of the Politique Raad, June 11, 1636. 59 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Philips Serooskerken, June 11, 1636. “Den handel van particulieren compt hierin zoodanigen consideratie, dat noch militaire noch maritime, noch politycque, noch Ecclesiastique haer met genouch daerover verwonderen en commen, Oordelen geen beter middel gevonden te commen worden, om de Comp te gronde te helpen, ende de particuliere in corten tyt schatryck te maecken, dan dat den oorloch ende de oncosten daer aen dependerende de Comp. als een verterende Worm behoude” 60 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Jan Robberts, August 12, 1636. “Doch ick schrijve met myn particulier gevoelen, u E. sullen misschien beter tot voordeel van. Comp. onderrecht syn, Dat ick van haerten wensche.” 61 Ibid. 189
“walking the land half-naked” for want of clothes and food. 62 If the company sent additional provisions and paid the soldiers in cash, he suggested, it would “receive with one hand what it paid with the other,” and thus make an additional profit. He recommended four measures: the trade should be reserved to the company; fresh soldiers and supplies should be sent out at once; soldiers should be made responsible for their own upkeep; and a general should be appointed to restore order and oversee the full range of the colony's military and civilian affairs. Separate letters by Hendrik Schilt and Willem Schot offered many of the same recommendations. 63 Christoffel Artichewski, the Polish colonel who led company forces in Brazil during the early and mid-1630s, would later explain to Johan Maurits, that these letters contained numerous mistakes and misinterpretations. But their impact in the United Provinces was dramatic. 64 The first set of letters arrived in Zeeland on August 18, 1636, barely two weeks after Johan Maurits had been selected to serve as Governor General of Dutch Brazil, with broad powers to reorganize and expand the colony. Appointing a nobleman of such high status represented a major investment for the company: with Johan Maurits already preparing to depart at the head of 3,000 new troops, news of the poor state of the army and provisions must have been particularly disturbing. But the letters also played directly into Zeeland's hand. After reading them, the chamber's directors resolved that closing the trade to Brazil was now urgent. 65 The States General was similarly moved. In October, after the second batch of letters had arrived from Brazil, they formally requested advice from each of the company's five 62 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Jan Robberts, July 24, 1636. 63 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Hendrik Schilt, September 4, 1636; Extracts from a letter from Willem Schot to the Heren XIX, July 25, 1636. 64 Christoffel Artichewski, “Missive van den Kolonnel Artichofsky aan Graaf Maurits en de Hoogen Raad in Brazilië, 24 Juli 1637,” Kronijk van het Historisch Genootschap gevestigd te Utrecht 25, no. 5 (1869): 231. J. C. M. Warsinck, “Christoffel Artichewsky,” in Iaerlyck Verhael van de Verrichtingen der Geoctryeerde West-Indische Compagnie, ed. L’Honoré Naber, vol. 4 (’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1937), xxv–lxxii; Xavier, “Het Gebruik van Egodocumenten en Nederlands Brazilië: De Memorie van Kolonel Christoffel Arciszewski.” 65 NA 1.05.01.01, inv.nr. 22, entry for August 18, 1636. 190
- Page 149 and 150: noblemen played in overseas adminis
- Page 151 and 152: good order, police and justice, and
- Page 153 and 154: the council's size and authority, d
- Page 155 and 156: servants. These individuals may not
- Page 157 and 158: At this point the election was comp
- Page 159 and 160: (Receiver General) of the United Pr
- Page 161 and 162: Why did these candidates all refuse
- Page 163 and 164: Alexander's name was almost certain
- Page 165 and 166: None of the remaining records indic
- Page 167 and 168: would be profitable and that their
- Page 169 and 170: Haecxs thanked them for the honor t
- Page 171 and 172: On June 22, 1645—just a week befo
- Page 173 and 174: 5. Wolter Schonenborch and the Ritu
- Page 175 and 176: with the WIC presumably did not go
- Page 177 and 178: Haecx recorded in his diary that on
- Page 179 and 180: wavered, for De Laet, who was many
- Page 181 and 182: privately to Brazil, legally or ill
- Page 183 and 184: 1. Introduction Chapter Five Free T
- Page 185 and 186: left relatively open. 6 Where monop
- Page 187 and 188: community saw greater profits in pr
- Page 189 and 190: and close trade to private merchant
- Page 191 and 192: trouble paying its bills, especiall
- Page 193 and 194: means to capitalize the company wit
- Page 195 and 196: director than his trade to Brazil,
- Page 197 and 198: With the verhoging stalled, and ani
- Page 199: e handled without gloves.” 55 In
- Page 203 and 204: While the resolution as a whole sho
- Page 205 and 206: along with the two powerful Amsterd
- Page 207 and 208: Cornelis Melijn, of a patroonschap
- Page 209 and 210: this measure, he said, “no one in
- Page 211 and 212: maintaining the company's solvency,
- Page 213 and 214: colony, overestimated the number of
- Page 215 and 216: And Maurits offered another argumen
- Page 217 and 218: Stellingwerf, who sat in the States
- Page 219 and 220: Provinces, plus smaller fees of 3%
- Page 221 and 222: exclude private merchants from the
- Page 223 and 224: clamoring for slaves. 136 The probl
- Page 225 and 226: expedition's success, along with de
- Page 227 and 228: trading locations on the Gold Coast
- Page 229 and 230: directly from New Netherland, and s
- Page 231 and 232: over trade was simply the projectio
- Page 233 and 234: the area in which the company was b
- Page 235 and 236: had not yet been renewed. 4 As the
- Page 237 and 238: to the Dutch state, and that this d
- Page 239 and 240: ookkeeping from late-fifteenth cent
- Page 241 and 242: ambitions. 21 Although neither Spec
- Page 243 and 244: expenses at each of the company's c
- Page 245 and 246: included. 34 In Specx’s estimatio
- Page 247 and 248: calculations yielded a profit of 41
- Page 249 and 250: notes on these documents, suggest t
and Philips Serooskerken. 58 The recognition fees th<strong>at</strong> the company collected on goods shipped<br />
by priv<strong>at</strong>e traders were welcome, the letter argued, but they were tiny in comparison to the<br />
profits of the trade itself. The only way to secure a gre<strong>at</strong>er portion of these profits would be to<br />
close the trade. In his separ<strong>at</strong>e letter, Serooskerken, a Zeelander, expressed the frustr<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
indign<strong>at</strong>ion aroused by the activities of the priv<strong>at</strong>e traders. While the company was obliged to<br />
maintain the army and its own servants—as well the forts, warehouses, and living quarters—the<br />
priv<strong>at</strong>e traders were making a fortune on the trade in sugar and provisions. Not only did this give<br />
them an unfair advantage, Serooskerken reasoned, but it led to price infl<strong>at</strong>ion, since the priv<strong>at</strong>e<br />
traders simply added to the price of the goods they sold the recognition fees they paid to the<br />
company, plus 100-200% in profits. In Recife the price for houses, many of which were still<br />
dilapid<strong>at</strong>ed as a result of the war, had increased as much as sevenfold. As a result, many in the<br />
colony—and especially the company's soldiers and menial servants—had fallen deeply in debt.<br />
The priv<strong>at</strong>e trade, Serooskerken concluded, was “e<strong>at</strong>ing the company like a worm.” 59<br />
Jan Robberts, another company official, qualified his remarks as based solely on “my<br />
personal sentiments,” but the recommend<strong>at</strong>ions he offered were almost exactly the same. 60 The<br />
priv<strong>at</strong>e traders, he wrote, were “no friends of the company,” but r<strong>at</strong>her men who in every<br />
instance placed their own particular interests above those of either company or f<strong>at</strong>herland. 61 He<br />
echoed Serooskerken's reports on the poor st<strong>at</strong>e of the company's warehouses and the rapid rise<br />
in prices, which he blamed for the “thousands” of company soldiers th<strong>at</strong> could be found<br />
<br />
58 NA 1.01.07, inv.nr. 1<strong>25</strong>64.5. Extracts from the letter of the Politique Raad, June 11, 1636.<br />
59 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Philips Serooskerken, June 11, 1636. “Den handel van particulieren compt hierin<br />
zoodanigen consider<strong>at</strong>ie, d<strong>at</strong> noch militaire noch maritime, noch politycque, noch Ecclesiastique haer met genouch<br />
daerover verwonderen en commen, Oordelen geen beter middel gevonden te commen worden, om de Comp te<br />
gronde te helpen, ende de particuliere in corten tyt sch<strong>at</strong>ryck te maecken, dan d<strong>at</strong> den oorloch ende de oncosten daer<br />
aen dependerende de Comp. als een verterende Worm behoude”<br />
60 Ibid. Extracts from a letter from Jan Robberts, August 12, 1636. “Doch ick schrijve met myn particulier gevoelen,<br />
u E. sullen misschien beter tot voordeel van. Comp. onderrecht syn, D<strong>at</strong> ick van haerten wensche.”<br />
61 Ibid.<br />
189