Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
09.04.2013 Views

July of 1635, they had recommended that the trade to Brazil remain open, but that investors in the company who traded on their own account be given preferential terms, including lowering the recognition fees due the company to 5% from the normal rate of 10%. 46 This proposal was not adopted and the Amsterdam hoofdparticipanten eventually resolved to support keeping the trade open. But their position can only have further undermined confidence among the other chambers and cities, which increasingly voiced concern about the cozy relationship between Amsterdam's directors and the private merchants trading to Brazil. These concerns took concrete form in yet another way. The WIC's charter called for each chamber of the company to manage its own capital stock and lists of shareholders, even though profits and losses were reconciled annually and distributed amongst the five chambers based on a set proportional formula. Evidently the founders of the company did not foresee, or at least did not take steps to prevent, the possibility that shares issued by different chambers would begin to trade at different prices. But once Brazil was opened to private merchants, this is exactly what happened. In their report in May of 1635, Van Arnhem and Herberts noted that the value of shares in the company had “begun to diverge widely.” 47 In Amsterdam shares were selling for 119-120 guilders, while in Groningen they had sunk to 94-95 guilders, below par. Zeeland pointed out that VOC shares had never diverged in this fashion, and, at the next meeting of the Heren XIX in July of the same year, protested that failing to protect the company's monopoly indirectly permitted “the majority [of the trade] to fall to Amsterdam, to the prejudice of the other chambers and cities.” 48 























































 46 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fols. 107-114. Remonstratie van de Hooftparticipanten van de Camer Amsterdam. 47 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fol. 59. Rapport van de Heeren Arnhem ende Herberts. “Die actien die nu soo verschieden van prys zijn in der respective cameren.” 48 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fol. 137. Rapport van de heeren Arnhem ende Pauw Gecommitteerden van wegen hare hooch mo. op de Jongste vergaderinge van de Negentiene van de Westindische Compagnie binnen Amsterdam die beschieden is geweest den ii July 1635 ende geendicht den eerste ten Augusti daer aen volgende. 
 185

With the verhoging stalled, and animosity towards Amsterdam's directors building, Zeeland seized the opportunity to press its case for the trade to be closed. On the chamber's copy of the draft agenda for the fall meeting of the Heren XIX, scheduled to begin in Amsterdam on December 8, 1636, they recorded a unanimous decision that further discussion of the verhoging was to be contingent upon resolution of the question of closing the trade to Brazil, and a delegation was appointed to carry this message directly to the representatives of the States General at The Hague. 49 By this time the chambers of the Maas, Groningen, and North Holland all had reached the same conclusion: the only means to refinance the company, and thereby to adequately provide for the colony, was to re-impose the company's monopoly. It was colonial policy, not “cupidity” or greed, that motivated Zeeland and its allies. 3. Decision-Making at The States General The States General's decision to close the trade to Brazil on December 27, 1636 was not just about money: it was also based on advice coming from the Hoge Raad in Brazil and on a vision for the colony based on unified authority, military expansion, and slavery. Identifying the ultimate locus of decision-making within the complex political structure of the United Provinces is no easier for the modern historian than it was for contemporaries who shuttled back and forth between city governments, provincial states, the States General, and other bodies looking for definitive resolution to disagreements over matters of law and policy. 50 As we saw in Chapter Three, in the case of the WIC the difficulty is compounded by the overlapping responsibilities of 























































 49 NA 1.05.01.01 inv.nr. 22, entry for December 1, 1636. “Te consenteren tot verhooginge van de Capitalen, mits dat de handeling aende Comp. blyve, volgens hey viii poinct. Synde dit geresolveert met eenparige stemmen.” 50 Fruin, Geschiedenis der Staatsinstellingen in Nederland tot den val der Republiek; Frijhoff and Spies, 1650: Hard-Won Unity, 220–226; Goldgar, Tulipmania; Van Vree, Meetings, Manners, and Civilization. 
 186

July of 1635, they had recommended th<strong>at</strong> the trade to Brazil remain open, but th<strong>at</strong> investors in<br />

the company who traded on their own account be given preferential terms, including lowering<br />

the recognition fees due the company to 5% from the normal r<strong>at</strong>e of 10%. 46 This proposal was<br />

not adopted and the Amsterdam hoofdparticipanten eventually resolved to support keeping the<br />

trade open. But their position can only have further undermined confidence among the other<br />

chambers and cities, which increasingly voiced concern about the cozy rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between<br />

Amsterdam's directors and the priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants trading to Brazil.<br />

These concerns took concrete form in yet another way. The WIC's charter called for<br />

each chamber of the company to manage its own capital stock and lists of shareholders, even<br />

though profits and losses were reconciled annually and distributed amongst the five chambers<br />

based on a set proportional formula. Evidently the founders of the company did not foresee, or <strong>at</strong><br />

least did not take steps to prevent, the possibility th<strong>at</strong> shares issued by different chambers would<br />

begin to trade <strong>at</strong> different prices. But once Brazil was opened to priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants, this is exactly<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> happened. In their report in <strong>May</strong> of 1635, Van Arnhem and Herberts noted th<strong>at</strong> the value of<br />

shares in the company had “begun to diverge widely.” 47 In Amsterdam shares were selling for<br />

119-120 guilders, while in Groningen they had sunk to 94-95 guilders, below par. Zeeland<br />

pointed out th<strong>at</strong> VOC shares had never diverged in this fashion, and, <strong>at</strong> the next meeting of the<br />

Heren XIX in July of the same year, protested th<strong>at</strong> failing to protect the company's monopoly<br />

indirectly permitted “the majority [of the trade] to fall to Amsterdam, to the prejudice of the<br />

other chambers and cities.” 48<br />

























































<br />

46 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fols. 107-114. Remonstr<strong>at</strong>ie van de Hooftparticipanten van de Camer Amsterdam.<br />

47 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fol. 59. Rapport van de Heeren Arnhem ende Herberts. “Die actien die nu soo<br />

verschieden van prys zijn in der respective cameren.”<br />

48 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5754, fol. 137. Rapport van de heeren Arnhem ende Pauw Gecommitteerden van wegen hare<br />

hooch mo. op de Jongste vergaderinge van de Negentiene van de Westindische Compagnie binnen Amsterdam die<br />

beschieden is geweest den ii July 1635 ende geendicht den eerste ten Augusti daer aen volgende.<br />


 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!