Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
settlements in the Americas. 19 The argument for commercial freedom, Weststeijn contends, “was<br />
perhaps the most important ideological legacy of the rise, decline and fall of Dutch Brazil.” 20<br />
This chapter will suggest a very different legacy of the deb<strong>at</strong>e over free trade, namely the<br />
WIC's decision to enter the trade in slaves. Although scholars have long recognized th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
company's first forays into the slave trade were in 1636—the same year th<strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>es General<br />
re-imposed a monopoly on trade to Brazil—and th<strong>at</strong> slaves were listed as one of only three items<br />
excluded from free trade in the St<strong>at</strong>es General's resolution th<strong>at</strong> lifted the monopoly in 1638, there<br />
has been no effort to explain wh<strong>at</strong> rel<strong>at</strong>ionship, if any, there was between these two highly<br />
significant, essentially contemporary developments. 21 By looking closely <strong>at</strong> the negoti<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
themselves, r<strong>at</strong>her than the rhetorical arguments found in printed pamphlets, the chapter tries to<br />
tease out this rel<strong>at</strong>ionship and to show its importance for our understanding of both company<br />
politics and the longer-term evolution of Dutch particip<strong>at</strong>ion in the slave trade. This requires<br />
methodically re-examining the deb<strong>at</strong>e over free trade to Brazil and connecting it to the deb<strong>at</strong>e<br />
over free trade to Angola th<strong>at</strong> began only four years l<strong>at</strong>er. It also requires focusing more<br />
carefully on the medi<strong>at</strong>ors, r<strong>at</strong>her than the antagonists, and on the give and take and compromise<br />
of practical politics. In particular, it requires being sensitive to the ways th<strong>at</strong> seemingly discrete<br />
and un-rel<strong>at</strong>ed issues can suddenly become contingent during the course of negoti<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />
The chapter argues th<strong>at</strong> the deb<strong>at</strong>es over free trade—to both Brazil and Angola—were<br />
primarily deb<strong>at</strong>es over colonial politics, r<strong>at</strong>her than trade, and th<strong>at</strong> successive decisions to open<br />
<br />
19<br />
Ibid., 11. Smith's quot<strong>at</strong>ion is taken from vol. 2, book IV, chapter 7. See Smith, An Inquiry into the N<strong>at</strong>ure and<br />
Causes of the Wealth of N<strong>at</strong>ions, 117.<br />
20<br />
Weststeijn, “Dutch Brazil and the Making of Free Trade Ideology,” 12.<br />
21<br />
Boxer tre<strong>at</strong>s these two issues sequentially, but does not analytically connect them. Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil,<br />
1624-1654, 75–84. Richard Tuck remarks on the coincidence of the two issues in Grotius' De Jure Belli et Pacis,<br />
published in 16<strong>25</strong>: “It is significant th<strong>at</strong> the first major public expression of a strong rights theory to be read in<br />
Protestant Europe should have contained both a defence of slavery and absolutism and a defence of resistance and<br />
common property in extremis.” N<strong>at</strong>ural Rights Theories (Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1981), 80. Cited<br />
in Blackburn, The Making of New World Slavery, 194.<br />
177