Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
trade developed in the colony's most important commodity, sugar. 11 This resulted in a boom atmosphere in the Dutch colony, but it left most of the profits in private hands at precisely the moment that costs for the colony's military defense were becoming unsustainable. In December of 1636 the States General passed a resolution reinstating the company's full monopoly and forbidding any further private trade to Brazil. This generated a swift and angry reaction, especially from merchants in Amsterdam, where a number of pamphlets appeared arguing that the trade should be left open. One of these pamphlets likened the company's grip on Brazil to the tyranny of the Duke of Alva; not only was the company incapable of conducting the trade to Brazil on an adequate scale, but the monopoly would enrage Portuguese merchants and discourage potential settlers who would only wish to travel to Brazil if their rights and liberties were guaranteed. 12 Defenders of the monopoly, based primarily in Zeeland, replied in kind, arguing that it was unjust for private merchants to reap all the benefits while the company's investors were saddled only with debts. Moreover, they reasoned that private merchants, “intent on their own profit,” were unlikely to cultivate the land to benefit of the colony, and thus the United Provinces, as a whole. 13 Ultimately, the arguments in favor of free trade carried the day and the States General re-opened the trade to Brazil in April of 1638. The debate has fascinated generations of historians and features prominently in nearly every account of the WIC's history. 14 These accounts have emphasized the acrimony between Amsterdam and Zeeland and their divergent interests: whereas Amsterdam's powerful merchant 11 Narder Ordre Ende Reglement ... over Het Open Ende Vry Stellen Van Den Handel Ende Negotie Op De Stadt Olinda De Pernambuco Ende Custen Van Brasil, 1634; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 76. 12 Vertooch by een Liefhebber der Vaderlants vertoont tegen het Ongefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil, 1637. 13 Examen over het Vertoogh, teghen het Onghefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil. Door een Ondersoecker der Waerheydt, 1637. 14 Wätjen, O Dominio Colonial Hollandez no Brasil: Um capitulo da historia colonial do seculo XVII; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654; Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek”; Den Heijer, “Het Recht van de Sterkste in de Polder: Politieke en Economische Strijd tussen Amsterdam en Zeeland over de Kwestie Brazilie, 1630-1654.” 175
community saw greater profits in private trade, merchants and magistrates in Zeeland supported the company's monopoly as a means to protect their share in colonial markets where Amsterdam would otherwise enjoy considerable advantages. 15 These accounts interpret the debate primarily in terms of the ways that it exposed inter-regional conflicts within the Dutch Republic. In a forthcoming article, Arthur Weststeijn argues that its significance was far greater. By tracing a "crooked historical route" from pamphlets written in the 1630s to Pieter de la Court and the abbé Raynal, he suggests that the debate “played an important role in the development of free trade ideology throughout the Enlightenment.” 16 Weststeijn's route begins with an examination of De la Court's critique of monopolies in the 1660s as being antithetical to commercial liberty. In the specific case of the WIC, according to De la Court, the company's emphasis on “Princely wars” and “Monarchical conquests,” rather than free trade, was largely responsible for the loss of Dutch Brazil. 17 Had the trade been open, he argued, the colony might have thrived: By an open trade, and consequently well-founded colonies, not only the mighty Lands of Brazil, Guinea, Angola, São Tomé, &c, could have easily been defended with small expenses against all foreign aggression, but, which is very considerable, we would have been able to carry on an immense trade with our own Nation, without fear that a foreign Potentate would seize our ships, goods, or debts. 18 The dissemination of De la Court's writings throughout Europe, and especially in England and France, brought this assessment to the attention of, among others, both Raynal and Adam Smith, who blamed the WIC monopoly for the “slow and languid” progress of Dutch colonial 15 Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek.” 16 Weststeijn, “Dutch Brazil and the Making of Free Trade Ideology,” 1–2. This text will appear in the forthcoming collection The Legacy of Dutch Brazil, edited by Michiel van Groesen. Cited with permission of the author. 17 Ibid., 7. 18 Cited in ibid. The translation is Weststeijn’s. 176
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5. Seating for the delegation
- Page 137 and 138: phase of the company’s Groot Dess
- Page 139 and 140: to be understood the sending over o
- Page 141 and 142: But by far the most important trans
- Page 143 and 144: Illustration 8. Map of Mauritstad a
- Page 145 and 146: geographers whose works remain a tr
- Page 147 and 148: important military, administrative,
- Page 149 and 150: noblemen played in overseas adminis
- Page 151 and 152: good order, police and justice, and
- Page 153 and 154: the council's size and authority, d
- Page 155 and 156: servants. These individuals may not
- Page 157 and 158: At this point the election was comp
- Page 159 and 160: (Receiver General) of the United Pr
- Page 161 and 162: Why did these candidates all refuse
- Page 163 and 164: Alexander's name was almost certain
- Page 165 and 166: None of the remaining records indic
- Page 167 and 168: would be profitable and that their
- Page 169 and 170: Haecxs thanked them for the honor t
- Page 171 and 172: On June 22, 1645—just a week befo
- Page 173 and 174: 5. Wolter Schonenborch and the Ritu
- Page 175 and 176: with the WIC presumably did not go
- Page 177 and 178: Haecx recorded in his diary that on
- Page 179 and 180: wavered, for De Laet, who was many
- Page 181 and 182: privately to Brazil, legally or ill
- Page 183 and 184: 1. Introduction Chapter Five Free T
- Page 185: left relatively open. 6 Where monop
- Page 189 and 190: and close trade to private merchant
- Page 191 and 192: trouble paying its bills, especiall
- Page 193 and 194: means to capitalize the company wit
- Page 195 and 196: director than his trade to Brazil,
- Page 197 and 198: With the verhoging stalled, and ani
- Page 199 and 200: e handled without gloves.” 55 In
- Page 201 and 202: “walking the land half-naked” f
- Page 203 and 204: While the resolution as a whole sho
- Page 205 and 206: along with the two powerful Amsterd
- Page 207 and 208: Cornelis Melijn, of a patroonschap
- Page 209 and 210: this measure, he said, “no one in
- Page 211 and 212: maintaining the company's solvency,
- Page 213 and 214: colony, overestimated the number of
- Page 215 and 216: And Maurits offered another argumen
- Page 217 and 218: Stellingwerf, who sat in the States
- Page 219 and 220: Provinces, plus smaller fees of 3%
- Page 221 and 222: exclude private merchants from the
- Page 223 and 224: clamoring for slaves. 136 The probl
- Page 225 and 226: expedition's success, along with de
- Page 227 and 228: trading locations on the Gold Coast
- Page 229 and 230: directly from New Netherland, and s
- Page 231 and 232: over trade was simply the projectio
- Page 233 and 234: the area in which the company was b
- Page 235 and 236: had not yet been renewed. 4 As the
trade developed in the colony's most important commodity, sugar. 11 This resulted in a boom<br />
<strong>at</strong>mosphere in the Dutch colony, but it left most of the profits in priv<strong>at</strong>e hands <strong>at</strong> precisely the<br />
moment th<strong>at</strong> costs for the colony's military defense were becoming unsustainable.<br />
In December of 1636 the St<strong>at</strong>es General passed a resolution reinst<strong>at</strong>ing the company's full<br />
monopoly and forbidding any further priv<strong>at</strong>e trade to Brazil. This gener<strong>at</strong>ed a swift and angry<br />
reaction, especially from merchants in Amsterdam, where a number of pamphlets appeared<br />
arguing th<strong>at</strong> the trade should be left open. One of these pamphlets likened the company's grip on<br />
Brazil to the tyranny of the Duke of Alva; not only was the company incapable of conducting the<br />
trade to Brazil on an adequ<strong>at</strong>e scale, but the monopoly would enrage Portuguese merchants and<br />
discourage potential settlers who would only wish to travel to Brazil if their rights and liberties<br />
were guaranteed. 12 Defenders of the monopoly, based primarily in Zeeland, replied in kind,<br />
arguing th<strong>at</strong> it was unjust for priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants to reap all the benefits while the company's<br />
investors were saddled only with debts. Moreover, they reasoned th<strong>at</strong> priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants, “intent<br />
on their own profit,” were unlikely to cultiv<strong>at</strong>e the land to benefit of the colony, and thus the<br />
United Provinces, as a whole. 13 Ultim<strong>at</strong>ely, the arguments in favor of free trade carried the day<br />
and the St<strong>at</strong>es General re-opened the trade to Brazil in April of 1638.<br />
The deb<strong>at</strong>e has fascin<strong>at</strong>ed gener<strong>at</strong>ions of historians and fe<strong>at</strong>ures prominently in nearly<br />
every account of the WIC's history. 14 These accounts have emphasized the acrimony between<br />
Amsterdam and Zeeland and their divergent interests: whereas Amsterdam's powerful merchant<br />
<br />
11 Narder Ordre Ende Reglement ... over Het Open Ende Vry Stellen Van Den Handel Ende Negotie Op De Stadt<br />
Olinda De Pernambuco Ende Custen Van Brasil, 1634; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 76.<br />
12 Vertooch by een Liefhebber der Vaderlants vertoont tegen het Ongefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen<br />
Handel in Brasil, 1637.<br />
13 Examen over het Vertoogh, teghen het Onghefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil.<br />
Door een Ondersoecker der Waerheydt, 1637.<br />
14 Wätjen, O Dominio Colonial Hollandez no Brasil: Um capitulo da historia colonial do seculo XVII; Boxer, The<br />
Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654; Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek”; Den Heijer,<br />
“Het Recht van de Sterkste in de Polder: Politieke en Economische Strijd tussen Amsterdam en Zeeland over de<br />
Kwestie Brazilie, 1630-1654.”<br />
175