Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
09.04.2013 Views

trade developed in the colony's most important commodity, sugar. 11 This resulted in a boom atmosphere in the Dutch colony, but it left most of the profits in private hands at precisely the moment that costs for the colony's military defense were becoming unsustainable. In December of 1636 the States General passed a resolution reinstating the company's full monopoly and forbidding any further private trade to Brazil. This generated a swift and angry reaction, especially from merchants in Amsterdam, where a number of pamphlets appeared arguing that the trade should be left open. One of these pamphlets likened the company's grip on Brazil to the tyranny of the Duke of Alva; not only was the company incapable of conducting the trade to Brazil on an adequate scale, but the monopoly would enrage Portuguese merchants and discourage potential settlers who would only wish to travel to Brazil if their rights and liberties were guaranteed. 12 Defenders of the monopoly, based primarily in Zeeland, replied in kind, arguing that it was unjust for private merchants to reap all the benefits while the company's investors were saddled only with debts. Moreover, they reasoned that private merchants, “intent on their own profit,” were unlikely to cultivate the land to benefit of the colony, and thus the United Provinces, as a whole. 13 Ultimately, the arguments in favor of free trade carried the day and the States General re-opened the trade to Brazil in April of 1638. The debate has fascinated generations of historians and features prominently in nearly every account of the WIC's history. 14 These accounts have emphasized the acrimony between Amsterdam and Zeeland and their divergent interests: whereas Amsterdam's powerful merchant 























































 11 Narder Ordre Ende Reglement ... over Het Open Ende Vry Stellen Van Den Handel Ende Negotie Op De Stadt Olinda De Pernambuco Ende Custen Van Brasil, 1634; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 76. 12 Vertooch by een Liefhebber der Vaderlants vertoont tegen het Ongefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil, 1637. 13 Examen over het Vertoogh, teghen het Onghefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil. Door een Ondersoecker der Waerheydt, 1637. 14 Wätjen, O Dominio Colonial Hollandez no Brasil: Um capitulo da historia colonial do seculo XVII; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654; Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek”; Den Heijer, “Het Recht van de Sterkste in de Polder: Politieke en Economische Strijd tussen Amsterdam en Zeeland over de Kwestie Brazilie, 1630-1654.” 
 175

community saw greater profits in private trade, merchants and magistrates in Zeeland supported the company's monopoly as a means to protect their share in colonial markets where Amsterdam would otherwise enjoy considerable advantages. 15 These accounts interpret the debate primarily in terms of the ways that it exposed inter-regional conflicts within the Dutch Republic. In a forthcoming article, Arthur Weststeijn argues that its significance was far greater. By tracing a "crooked historical route" from pamphlets written in the 1630s to Pieter de la Court and the abbé Raynal, he suggests that the debate “played an important role in the development of free trade ideology throughout the Enlightenment.” 16 Weststeijn's route begins with an examination of De la Court's critique of monopolies in the 1660s as being antithetical to commercial liberty. In the specific case of the WIC, according to De la Court, the company's emphasis on “Princely wars” and “Monarchical conquests,” rather than free trade, was largely responsible for the loss of Dutch Brazil. 17 Had the trade been open, he argued, the colony might have thrived: By an open trade, and consequently well-founded colonies, not only the mighty Lands of Brazil, Guinea, Angola, São Tomé, &c, could have easily been defended with small expenses against all foreign aggression, but, which is very considerable, we would have been able to carry on an immense trade with our own Nation, without fear that a foreign Potentate would seize our ships, goods, or debts. 18 The dissemination of De la Court's writings throughout Europe, and especially in England and France, brought this assessment to the attention of, among others, both Raynal and Adam Smith, who blamed the WIC monopoly for the “slow and languid” progress of Dutch colonial 























































 15 Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek.” 16 Weststeijn, “Dutch Brazil and the Making of Free Trade Ideology,” 1–2. This text will appear in the forthcoming collection The Legacy of Dutch Brazil, edited by Michiel van Groesen. Cited with permission of the author. 17 Ibid., 7. 18 Cited in ibid. The translation is Weststeijn’s. 
 176

trade developed in the colony's most important commodity, sugar. 11 This resulted in a boom<br />

<strong>at</strong>mosphere in the Dutch colony, but it left most of the profits in priv<strong>at</strong>e hands <strong>at</strong> precisely the<br />

moment th<strong>at</strong> costs for the colony's military defense were becoming unsustainable.<br />

In December of 1636 the St<strong>at</strong>es General passed a resolution reinst<strong>at</strong>ing the company's full<br />

monopoly and forbidding any further priv<strong>at</strong>e trade to Brazil. This gener<strong>at</strong>ed a swift and angry<br />

reaction, especially from merchants in Amsterdam, where a number of pamphlets appeared<br />

arguing th<strong>at</strong> the trade should be left open. One of these pamphlets likened the company's grip on<br />

Brazil to the tyranny of the Duke of Alva; not only was the company incapable of conducting the<br />

trade to Brazil on an adequ<strong>at</strong>e scale, but the monopoly would enrage Portuguese merchants and<br />

discourage potential settlers who would only wish to travel to Brazil if their rights and liberties<br />

were guaranteed. 12 Defenders of the monopoly, based primarily in Zeeland, replied in kind,<br />

arguing th<strong>at</strong> it was unjust for priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants to reap all the benefits while the company's<br />

investors were saddled only with debts. Moreover, they reasoned th<strong>at</strong> priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants, “intent<br />

on their own profit,” were unlikely to cultiv<strong>at</strong>e the land to benefit of the colony, and thus the<br />

United Provinces, as a whole. 13 Ultim<strong>at</strong>ely, the arguments in favor of free trade carried the day<br />

and the St<strong>at</strong>es General re-opened the trade to Brazil in April of 1638.<br />

The deb<strong>at</strong>e has fascin<strong>at</strong>ed gener<strong>at</strong>ions of historians and fe<strong>at</strong>ures prominently in nearly<br />

every account of the WIC's history. 14 These accounts have emphasized the acrimony between<br />

Amsterdam and Zeeland and their divergent interests: whereas Amsterdam's powerful merchant<br />

























































<br />

11 Narder Ordre Ende Reglement ... over Het Open Ende Vry Stellen Van Den Handel Ende Negotie Op De Stadt<br />

Olinda De Pernambuco Ende Custen Van Brasil, 1634; Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 76.<br />

12 Vertooch by een Liefhebber der Vaderlants vertoont tegen het Ongefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen<br />

Handel in Brasil, 1637.<br />

13 Examen over het Vertoogh, teghen het Onghefondeerde ende Schadelijck Sluyten der Vryen Handel in Brasil.<br />

Door een Ondersoecker der Waerheydt, 1637.<br />

14 Wätjen, O Dominio Colonial Hollandez no Brasil: Um capitulo da historia colonial do seculo XVII; Boxer, The<br />

Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654; Van Dillen, “De West-Indische Compagnie, het Calvinism en de Politiek”; Den Heijer,<br />

“Het Recht van de Sterkste in de Polder: Politieke en Economische Strijd tussen Amsterdam en Zeeland over de<br />

Kwestie Brazilie, 1630-1654.”<br />


 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!