Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
09.04.2013 Views

y all four of the other chambers. Van der Capellen reported that the discussion had caused tempers to flare and sewn dangerous disunity. In his view, the trades to Angola and Guinea were “the soul of the company.” 4 Opening either region to private merchants would undermine a critical source of revenue, with potentially catastrophic implications. But Amsterdam persisted, and when the Heren XIX gathered in Middelburg in September of 1645 item seven on the agenda asked, “How more blacks could be purchased at St. Paulo do Loanda” and “in what manner the trade in blacks shall be improved.” 5 Chapters Three and Four have examined politics within the Heren XIX from the perspective of competing visions for colonial administration, first at home and then abroad. This chapter looks instead at competing visions for the administration of trade. In particular, it explores how trade policy was used to balance the competing priorities of ensuring a smooth flow of goods, populating Brazil, and distributing the heavy financial burden of defending the WIC's conquests. In practice this manifested in a series of debates over whether trade within the territory defined by the company's charter should be open to all citizens of the United Provinces or reserved exclusively as a company monopoly. The Dutch Republic was probably more responsive to merchant interests than any government in Europe, but in practice this meant applying a wide range of different policies to different sectors and social groups: while, for instance, fishing and textiles were heavily regulated, finance and many branches of trade were 























































 4 Ibid. “Watter voor is geweest by eenige Bewinthebberen en hooftparticipanten van de Camer van Amsterdam om den handel op Angola wederom open te stellen voor yder een, hoe kostich sich die andere Cameren daertegens hebben gedeclareert. Wat oneenicheyt daeraf te verwachten stondt tuschen die camer van Amsterdam ende andere Cameren tot verachteringe en Discredyt van Westind. Companye, en soo sulx met goede reden is voorgekomen hoe de Negoty, prinsipalyck op Guinea en Angola is de Ziele der Compagnie, en hoe met aftrockinge ofte verminderinge van de selve de ruine der Compagnye wort veroorsaekt.” 5 NA 1.01.04, inv.nr. 5758, Poincten waerop all de Cameren van de West Indische Comp. beschreven worden ... Dated August 11, 1645. “wt de schriftelycke ende mondelinge advisen de comp. bekent synde dat Jaerlycx ongelyck meerder swaarten in St. paulo de loanda connen werden gehandelt als tot noch toe is geschiet, wanneer met behoorlyck cargasoen de cust sal werden versien, ende dat midts dien het proffyt, t' welcke in die conqueste streeckt voor de comp. daerwt niet wordt getrocken, is ter vergaderinge van XIX op den 30 Junio 1645 goetgevonden dat een poinct sal gemaect worden, hoe, ende op wat manniere den handel ende de negros best sullen werden gebeneficeert derhalven de Cameren verdracht willen syn derselver gecommitt. hierop insgelycx te lasten.” 
 173

left relatively open. 6 Where monopolies were imposed—including trade to the East and West Indies—they became the subject of intense criticism. Rather than promoting trade as a whole, monopolies by their very nature promoted the interests of some merchants and social groups above those of others; their intent, as Oscar Gelderblom has encouraged us to see, was political rather than strictly commercial. 7 This was already an important issue during the protracted negotiations to establish the WIC in the first two decades of the seventeenth century, but it erupted with particular force in the mid-1630s, when a heated debate broke out over the company's monopoly over trade to Brazil. Although the WIC charter strictly forbade private trade, a series of agreements negotiated during the late 1620s and early 1630s offered important exemptions. In 1628 both New Netherland and parts of the “Wild Coast” along the northern tip of South America were opened to private entrepreneurs who wished to establish settlements. 8 Then, in 1630, when the company seized Recife and Olinda in northeastern Brazil, treaties negotiated with representatives of the Portuguese community promised that private merchants would enjoy the same freedoms to trade on their own account that they had enjoyed under the King of Portugal. 9 These treaties were reinforced by regulations approved by the States General in 1630 that permitted private trade in all goods but dyewoods, foodstuffs, and ammunition, so long as private merchants registered their goods, transported them in company ships, and paid a percentage to the company in recognition and freight fees. 10 In 1634 these regulations were further relaxed and a brisk private 























































 6 D.C. Coleman, "Introduction" to his own edited collection, D. C. Coleman, ed., Revisions in Mercantilism (London: Methuen & Co., 1969), 12; De Vries and Van der Woude, The First Modern Economy. 7 Oscar Gelderblom, ed., The political economy of the Dutch Republic (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009). 8 Rink, Holland on the Hudson; Jacobs, The colony of New Netherland; Venema, Kiliaen van Rensselaer (1586- 1643): Designing a New World. 9 Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 75–76. 10 Articulum ... over het Open ende Vry Stellen van den Handel en Negotie op de Stadt Olinda de Pernambuco, ende Custen van Brasil (Amsterdam, 1630). 
 174

left rel<strong>at</strong>ively open. 6 Where monopolies were imposed—including trade to the East and West<br />

Indies—they became the subject of intense criticism. R<strong>at</strong>her than promoting trade as a whole,<br />

monopolies by their very n<strong>at</strong>ure promoted the interests of some merchants and social groups<br />

above those of others; their intent, as Oscar Gelderblom has encouraged us to see, was political<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her than strictly commercial. 7 This was already an important issue during the protracted<br />

negoti<strong>at</strong>ions to establish the WIC in the first two decades of the seventeenth century, but it<br />

erupted with particular force in the mid-1630s, when a he<strong>at</strong>ed deb<strong>at</strong>e broke out over the<br />

company's monopoly over trade to Brazil.<br />

Although the WIC charter strictly forbade priv<strong>at</strong>e trade, a series of agreements negoti<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

during the l<strong>at</strong>e 1620s and early 1630s offered important exemptions. In 1628 both New<br />

Netherland and parts of the “Wild Coast” along the northern tip of South America were opened<br />

to priv<strong>at</strong>e entrepreneurs who wished to establish settlements. 8 Then, in 1630, when the company<br />

seized Recife and Olinda in northeastern Brazil, tre<strong>at</strong>ies negoti<strong>at</strong>ed with represent<strong>at</strong>ives of the<br />

Portuguese community promised th<strong>at</strong> priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants would enjoy the same freedoms to trade<br />

on their own account th<strong>at</strong> they had enjoyed under the King of Portugal. 9 These tre<strong>at</strong>ies were<br />

reinforced by regul<strong>at</strong>ions approved by the St<strong>at</strong>es General in 1630 th<strong>at</strong> permitted priv<strong>at</strong>e trade in<br />

all goods but dyewoods, foodstuffs, and ammunition, so long as priv<strong>at</strong>e merchants registered<br />

their goods, transported them in company ships, and paid a percentage to the company in<br />

recognition and freight fees. 10 In 1634 these regul<strong>at</strong>ions were further relaxed and a brisk priv<strong>at</strong>e<br />

























































<br />

6<br />

D.C. Coleman, "Introduction" to his own edited collection, D. C. Coleman, ed., Revisions in Mercantilism<br />

(London: Methuen & Co., 1969), 12; De Vries and Van der Woude, The First Modern Economy.<br />

7<br />

Oscar Gelderblom, ed., The political economy of the Dutch Republic (Farnham: Ashg<strong>at</strong>e, 2009).<br />

8<br />

Rink, Holland on the Hudson; Jacobs, The colony of New Netherland; Venema, Kiliaen van Rensselaer (1586-<br />

1643): Designing a New World.<br />

9<br />

Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624-1654, 75–76.<br />

10<br />

Articulum ... over het Open ende Vry Stellen van den Handel en Negotie op de Stadt Olinda de Pernambuco, ende<br />

Custen van Brasil (Amsterdam, 1630).<br />


 174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!