Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
and especially in the secret minutes recorded by representatives of the States General, a source which Boxer did not consult. Echoing the debate over the Raedt van Indien in the period 1618- 1621, this concerned the thorny question of which groups within society—merchants, magistrates, or noblemen—were best suited to represent the company’s interests, and which skills were most appropriate to the task of colonial government. It was, in a deeper sense, a conflict over the company's aims in Brazil and between the various orders of Dutch society for the authority to implement them. Among these orders, the figure of the Dutch merchant is perhaps the most familiar, both to contemporaries in early modern Europe and from the classic studies of capitalism from Max Weber and Werner Sombart to the present day. 12 Less familiar is the figure of the Dutch nobleman, whose place in Dutch history has been all but forgotten, Peter Burke’s comparative study of elites in Venice and Amsterdam may be taken as emblematic of the problem. After briefly mentioning the Dutch nobility and the important role they played at the Stadholder’s court at The Hague, Burke devotes his study entirely to Amsterdam’s merchant oligarchy. Whereas Venice was governed by a closed group of noblemen, and thus could be characterized as an “estate society,” Burke argues, Amsterdam developed Europe's first “class society,” with political and economic power centralized in the hands of a few merchant families. 13 As a description of Amsterdam this is largely correct, but Amsterdam was only one city in the province of Holland, and Holland only one of eight provinces. As Henk van Nierop's recent study of the Dutch nobility makes clear, even in Holland noble families continued to serve 12 Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons (London: Routledge, 1992); Werner Sombart, Economic Life in the Modern Age, ed. Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2001). 13 Peter Burke, Venice and Amsterdam: A Study of Seventeenth-Century Elites (London: Temple Smith, 1974), 27. 135
important military, administrative, and legal functions at almost all levels of Dutch society. 14 Their prominence and influence may have declined relative to urban merchant oligarchs, but those noblemen who chose to remain active in politics could exercise considerable political influence. To take but one of Van Nierop's many examples, the number of noblemen who attended the meetings of Ridderschap (the council of nobleman in the States of Holland) declined markedly over the course of the sixteenth century, but those noblemen who attended did so more frequently. 15 And since the Ridderschap represented the smaller towns within the States of Holland, chaired its meetings, voted first, and had a formal role in resolving disputes, its power was far greater than its single vote might suggest. 16 The important place of noblemen in the United Provinces in the seventeenth century is now widely recognized among Dutch historians, partly as a result of Van Nierop's work, but it is still frequently overlooked by scholars working only in English. What role, if any, did the nobility play in Dutch overseas expansion? In Spain noblemen filled the ranks of the Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias and served as council president, at least until Philip II selected Juan de Ovando for this office in 1571. 17 Noblemen also played a critical role in expeditions of military conquest and as colonial viceroys in the New World. 18 In England, as Theodore Rabb has shown for the period 1575-1630, the gentry were disproportionately represented as investors and directors in overseas commercial enterprises—especially those 14 H. F. K. van Nierop, Van Ridders tot Regenten: De Hollandse Adel in de Zestiende en de eerste helft van de Zeventiende Eeuw (Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw, 1990). 15 Ibid., 151. 16 Ibid., 147. 17 Stafford Poole, Juan de Ovando: Governing the Spanish Empire in the Reign of Philip II (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004). 18 John Lynch, “The Institutional Framework of Colonial Spanish America,” Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (1992): 69–81. 136
- Page 95 and 96: De Laet's substantive work in the A
- Page 97 and 98: that, even at the beginning, De Lae
- Page 99 and 100: De Laet’s presence at the meeting
- Page 101 and 102: confessions under interrogation and
- Page 103 and 104: Brazil this meant the Heren XIX, wh
- Page 105 and 106: Illustration 7. Portrait of Willem
- Page 107 and 108: peaceful settlement along the fring
- Page 109 and 110: By analyzing the successive changes
- Page 111 and 112: convene in Amsterdam; the following
- Page 113 and 114: This formulation, which must previo
- Page 115 and 116: Amsterdam or Middelburg. 29 In this
- Page 117 and 118: (1566-1626), later burgemeester of
- Page 119 and 120: placed next to his description of t
- Page 121 and 122: That these two provisions remained
- Page 123 and 124: provinces. The creation of the WIC
- Page 125 and 126: The result was that the delegates f
- Page 127 and 128: to the original charter gave the ch
- Page 129 and 130: thus shows the political—as oppos
- Page 131 and 132: 1/10 of the equipagie and two direc
- Page 133 and 134: taken place. Once the draft letter
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5. Seating for the delegation
- Page 137 and 138: phase of the company’s Groot Dess
- Page 139 and 140: to be understood the sending over o
- Page 141 and 142: But by far the most important trans
- Page 143 and 144: Illustration 8. Map of Mauritstad a
- Page 145: geographers whose works remain a tr
- Page 149 and 150: noblemen played in overseas adminis
- Page 151 and 152: good order, police and justice, and
- Page 153 and 154: the council's size and authority, d
- Page 155 and 156: servants. These individuals may not
- Page 157 and 158: At this point the election was comp
- Page 159 and 160: (Receiver General) of the United Pr
- Page 161 and 162: Why did these candidates all refuse
- Page 163 and 164: Alexander's name was almost certain
- Page 165 and 166: None of the remaining records indic
- Page 167 and 168: would be profitable and that their
- Page 169 and 170: Haecxs thanked them for the honor t
- Page 171 and 172: On June 22, 1645—just a week befo
- Page 173 and 174: 5. Wolter Schonenborch and the Ritu
- Page 175 and 176: with the WIC presumably did not go
- Page 177 and 178: Haecx recorded in his diary that on
- Page 179 and 180: wavered, for De Laet, who was many
- Page 181 and 182: privately to Brazil, legally or ill
- Page 183 and 184: 1. Introduction Chapter Five Free T
- Page 185 and 186: left relatively open. 6 Where monop
- Page 187 and 188: community saw greater profits in pr
- Page 189 and 190: and close trade to private merchant
- Page 191 and 192: trouble paying its bills, especiall
- Page 193 and 194: means to capitalize the company wit
- Page 195 and 196: director than his trade to Brazil,
and especially in the secret minutes recorded by represent<strong>at</strong>ives of the St<strong>at</strong>es General, a source<br />
which Boxer did not consult. Echoing the deb<strong>at</strong>e over the Raedt van Indien in the period 1618-<br />
1621, this concerned the thorny question of which groups within society—merchants,<br />
magistr<strong>at</strong>es, or noblemen—were best suited to represent the company’s interests, and which<br />
skills were most appropri<strong>at</strong>e to the task of colonial government. It was, in a deeper sense, a<br />
conflict over the company's aims in Brazil and between the various orders of Dutch society for<br />
the authority to implement them.<br />
Among these orders, the figure of the Dutch merchant is perhaps the most familiar, both<br />
to contemporaries in early modern Europe and from the classic studies of capitalism from Max<br />
Weber and Werner Sombart to the present day. 12 Less familiar is the figure of the Dutch<br />
nobleman, whose place in Dutch history has been all but forgotten, Peter Burke’s compar<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
study of elites in Venice and Amsterdam may be taken as emblem<strong>at</strong>ic of the problem. After<br />
briefly mentioning the Dutch nobility and the important role they played <strong>at</strong> the Stadholder’s<br />
court <strong>at</strong> The Hague, Burke devotes his study entirely to Amsterdam’s merchant oligarchy.<br />
Whereas Venice was governed by a closed group of noblemen, and thus could be characterized<br />
as an “est<strong>at</strong>e society,” Burke argues, Amsterdam developed Europe's first “class society,” with<br />
political and economic power centralized in the hands of a few merchant families. 13 As a<br />
description of Amsterdam this is largely correct, but Amsterdam was only one city in the<br />
province of Holland, and Holland only one of eight provinces. As Henk van Nierop's recent<br />
study of the Dutch nobility makes clear, even in Holland noble families continued to serve<br />
<br />
12 Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons (London: Routledge, 1992);<br />
Werner Sombart, Economic Life in the Modern Age, ed. Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann (New Brunswick:<br />
Transaction Publishers, 2001).<br />
13 Peter Burke, Venice and Amsterdam: A Study of Seventeenth-Century Elites (London: Temple Smith, 1974), 27.<br />
135