Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University Dissertation_A Bick_May 25 - DataSpace at Princeton University
company's general meeting. Article 23 of the draft charter indicated that Amsterdam would contribute eight persons, Zeeland four, and the Maas and North Holland each two. In the case of the VOC, the seventeenth delegate was always selected by one of the non-Amsterdam chambers in a system of rotation designed to ensure that Amsterdam could never control an absolute majority. But in the 1606 draft, this formula was not adopted. After the words “understanding that the seventeenth person…” the anonymous scribe left only a blank line. 22 From this we can infer that the commission recognized the need to check Amsterdam’s power, but could reach no agreement on who should cast the deciding vote. This question was resolved several years later, in 1614, when negotiations resumed at the behest of merchants in Holland. 23 The decisive language can be traced directly to Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, the Landsadvocaat (Executive Administrator in the States of Holland) and the most important political figure in the United Provinces. Although Van Oldenbarnevelt opposed any steps that would offend Spain and re-ignite the war, he faced considerable pressure to protect Dutch merchants from Iberian aggression, especially in Guinea. Perhaps knowing that these terms would prove unacceptable, or perhaps to ensure his own influence if the negotiations succeeded, he amended the draft to provide a more prominent role for the States General. On a copy of the 1606 draft to be found amongst his papers at the National Archive in The Hague, Van Oldenbarnevelt filled in the blank line in Article 23 with the words “shall be appointed by us,” referring to the States General. 24 22 Ibid., 56. “Welverstaende dat de seventhien personen…” 23 Heijer, “The Twelve Years’ Truce and the Founding of the Dutch West India Company”; Rees, Geschiedenis der Staathuishoudkunde in Nederland tot het Einde der Achttiende Eeuw, 2:99. 24 “By ons werden gedeputeerd.” States of Holland, Collection of Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, NA 3.01.04 inv.nr. 3164, Article XVII. In this document van Oldenbarnevelt also resolved the question of who would select directors from amongst the candidates presented by the hooftparticipanten, writing “by the magistrates” in the margin of Article 13. In her study of Willem Usselincx, C. Lichtenburg argues that van Oldenbarnavelt was keen for the 1614 draft to be rejected. His work in connection with the WIC during this period warrants closer attention. See Ligtenberg, Willem Usselincx. 101
This formulation, which must previously have been discussed and rejected, broke decisively with the structure of the VOC. That company was accountable to the States General and met with its representatives at least once a year at the so-called Haags Besoigne (Consultations in The Hague), but its management was in the exclusive hands of merchants based in the maritime cities of Holland and Zeeland. 25 By placing one of its representatives on the WIC's board of directors, the States General relinquished this more passive, consultative role and sought instead to assume an active role in shaping company policy. Once again, the negotiations faltered, but an important shift nevertheless had been registered in the relationship between company and state. For Willem Usselincx, who began drafting an alternative charter shortly thereafter, this formulation was totally unacceptable: including a delegate appointed by the States General on the WIC’s board, he believed, would only confuse the roles of merchant and statesman, without adequately providing the company with the political support it would need. Usselincx’s draft proposed instead that the WIC be governed by a Raedt van Indien, an institution transparently modeled on contemporary Iberian practice. Founded in 1524, Spain's el Real y Supremo Consejo de Indias (Supreme Council for the Indies) was the central organ by which the King administered his American possessions. A sprawling bureaucracy, it was responsible for all matters relating to war, trade, and the administration of justice. And at its summit sat a group of eight well-connected noblemen and lawyers who reported directly to the King. 26 Usselincx was under no illusions that such an institution could be precisely replicated in the United Provinces, which was after all a Republic rather than a monarchy. Instead, he proposed a bi-cameral structure. Article 39 of his draft proposed a smaller, nine-person version 25 F. S. Gaastra, The Dutch East India Company: Expansion and Decline (Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2003). 26 Stafford Poole, Juan de Ovando: Governing the Spanish Empire in the Reign of Phillip II (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004). 102
- Page 61 and 62: the Portuguese, had crossed the Rio
- Page 63 and 64: ead aloud, two resolutions were pas
- Page 65 and 66: On Wednesday, the same day the ship
- Page 67 and 68: with subtle differences of fact and
- Page 69 and 70: The group consisted of Henderick Sc
- Page 71 and 72: XIX. Each chamber selected delegate
- Page 73 and 74: Inden naeme den heeren amen Saturn.
- Page 75 and 76: Middelburg’s decidedly incestuous
- Page 77 and 78: Illustration 6. Portrait of Johanne
- Page 79 and 80: crucial role that he played in its
- Page 81 and 82: When the meeting resumed on Monday
- Page 83 and 84: and to steer the discussion towards
- Page 85 and 86: were chosen from among the ranks of
- Page 87 and 88: emphasized the considerable sums in
- Page 89 and 90: 4. Johannes de Laet as “Informati
- Page 91 and 92: devote myself to my books.” 129 A
- Page 93 and 94: interests were adequately represent
- Page 95 and 96: De Laet's substantive work in the A
- Page 97 and 98: that, even at the beginning, De Lae
- Page 99 and 100: De Laet’s presence at the meeting
- Page 101 and 102: confessions under interrogation and
- Page 103 and 104: Brazil this meant the Heren XIX, wh
- Page 105 and 106: Illustration 7. Portrait of Willem
- Page 107 and 108: peaceful settlement along the fring
- Page 109 and 110: By analyzing the successive changes
- Page 111: convene in Amsterdam; the following
- Page 115 and 116: Amsterdam or Middelburg. 29 In this
- Page 117 and 118: (1566-1626), later burgemeester of
- Page 119 and 120: placed next to his description of t
- Page 121 and 122: That these two provisions remained
- Page 123 and 124: provinces. The creation of the WIC
- Page 125 and 126: The result was that the delegates f
- Page 127 and 128: to the original charter gave the ch
- Page 129 and 130: thus shows the political—as oppos
- Page 131 and 132: 1/10 of the equipagie and two direc
- Page 133 and 134: taken place. Once the draft letter
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5. Seating for the delegation
- Page 137 and 138: phase of the company’s Groot Dess
- Page 139 and 140: to be understood the sending over o
- Page 141 and 142: But by far the most important trans
- Page 143 and 144: Illustration 8. Map of Mauritstad a
- Page 145 and 146: geographers whose works remain a tr
- Page 147 and 148: important military, administrative,
- Page 149 and 150: noblemen played in overseas adminis
- Page 151 and 152: good order, police and justice, and
- Page 153 and 154: the council's size and authority, d
- Page 155 and 156: servants. These individuals may not
- Page 157 and 158: At this point the election was comp
- Page 159 and 160: (Receiver General) of the United Pr
- Page 161 and 162: Why did these candidates all refuse
company's general meeting. Article 23 of the draft charter indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> Amsterdam would<br />
contribute eight persons, Zeeland four, and the Maas and North Holland each two. In the case of<br />
the VOC, the seventeenth deleg<strong>at</strong>e was always selected by one of the non-Amsterdam chambers<br />
in a system of rot<strong>at</strong>ion designed to ensure th<strong>at</strong> Amsterdam could never control an absolute<br />
majority. But in the 1606 draft, this formula was not adopted. After the words “understanding<br />
th<strong>at</strong> the seventeenth person…” the anonymous scribe left only a blank line. 22 From this we can<br />
infer th<strong>at</strong> the commission recognized the need to check Amsterdam’s power, but could reach no<br />
agreement on who should cast the deciding vote.<br />
This question was resolved several years l<strong>at</strong>er, in 1614, when negoti<strong>at</strong>ions resumed <strong>at</strong> the<br />
behest of merchants in Holland. 23 The decisive language can be traced directly to Johan van<br />
Oldenbarnevelt, the Landsadvoca<strong>at</strong> (Executive Administr<strong>at</strong>or in the St<strong>at</strong>es of Holland) and the<br />
most important political figure in the United Provinces. Although Van Oldenbarnevelt opposed<br />
any steps th<strong>at</strong> would offend Spain and re-ignite the war, he faced considerable pressure to protect<br />
Dutch merchants from Iberian aggression, especially in Guinea. Perhaps knowing th<strong>at</strong> these<br />
terms would prove unacceptable, or perhaps to ensure his own influence if the negoti<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
succeeded, he amended the draft to provide a more prominent role for the St<strong>at</strong>es General. On a<br />
copy of the 1606 draft to be found amongst his papers <strong>at</strong> the N<strong>at</strong>ional Archive in The Hague,<br />
Van Oldenbarnevelt filled in the blank line in Article 23 with the words “shall be appointed by<br />
us,” referring to the St<strong>at</strong>es General. 24<br />
<br />
22 Ibid., 56. “Welverstaende d<strong>at</strong> de seventhien personen…”<br />
23 Heijer, “The Twelve Years’ Truce and the Founding of the Dutch West India Company”; Rees, Geschiedenis der<br />
Sta<strong>at</strong>huishoudkunde in Nederland tot het Einde der Achttiende Eeuw, 2:99.<br />
24 “By ons werden gedeputeerd.” St<strong>at</strong>es of Holland, Collection of Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, NA 3.01.04 inv.nr.<br />
3164, Article XVII. In this document van Oldenbarnevelt also resolved the question of who would select directors<br />
from amongst the candid<strong>at</strong>es presented by the hooftparticipanten, writing “by the magistr<strong>at</strong>es” in the margin of<br />
Article 13. In her study of Willem Usselincx, C. Lichtenburg argues th<strong>at</strong> van Oldenbarnavelt was keen for the 1614<br />
draft to be rejected. His work in connection with the WIC during this period warrants closer <strong>at</strong>tention. See<br />
Ligtenberg, Willem Usselincx.<br />
101