09.04.2013 Views

Download Here - IslamicBlessings.com

Download Here - IslamicBlessings.com

Download Here - IslamicBlessings.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mothers’ milk is not the sole source of children’s maturity. Mothers’ affection and tenderness,<br />

which is the natural and mental nutrition that is received through their breasts, share the same<br />

significance of natural nutrition in the fields of sound maturity and growth up. This is the main<br />

reason beyond favoring mothers’ nutrition to the artificial. In other words, mothers’ milk gives<br />

physical and affectionate maturity, while the artificial may contribute in the physical only since it<br />

is empty of the natural love and tenderness. Mothers whose babies are nurtured artificially are<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mended, by pediatrists, to embrace their babies frequently.[4] As a rule, sound maturity is<br />

attainable only through the reception of<br />

[1] Refer to Origin of family 81. For more information in this regard, it is re<strong>com</strong>mended to refer to<br />

Communism: 50.<br />

[2] Refer to Soviet constitution: 72.<br />

[3] Refer to Social bases: 72.<br />

[4] Refer to Bases of mental health: 75.<br />

acceptable amount of mothers’ love and affection. Mothers who leave their houses and babies<br />

will lose love and affection. Many educationists, economists and psychologists reproach women’s<br />

secluding their houses. Let us refer to some of these wordings and leave any <strong>com</strong>ment. A grand<br />

philosopher says, “As women began to practice general jobs, families began to dispel. Tests have<br />

proved that women began to revolt against the traditions of familiar ethics.”[1] John Simon the<br />

economist says, “Nowadays, women have been weavers and typists. The governments employed<br />

women in factories. They earned some money, but razed the pillars of their families thoroughly. It<br />

is yes that husbands benefit by their wives’ earnings, but their own earnings have been reduced<br />

because women began to <strong>com</strong>pete with them.”[2] August Cant, the sociologist, said, “If women’s<br />

manners in the social structure are kept up in the way they desire, expiry is their fate. They will be<br />

captive bondwomen.”[3] Annie Rod says, “It is quite preferable and less disastrous for our girls to<br />

work as maids in houses to joining the factories where they are polluted with profanities that rub<br />

out their glamour for good. I wish our countries were like those of Muslims in reserve, chastity<br />

and purity. Maids and servants there lead a life of ease and <strong>com</strong>fort and are treated as same as<br />

family members without any sort of abuse. It is dishonorable for the country of the English that<br />

our girls became models of vice due to association with men. I wonder why we decline to make<br />

our girls practice the jobs that accord their natural characters, such as the home affairs. For<br />

protecting our girls’ honor, we should lead them to avoid men’s jobs.”[4]<br />

Shafiq Jibri says, “Women in America are leaving their nature when they began to <strong>com</strong>pete with<br />

men in their jobs. This participation will soon demolish the rules of their social lives. How can a<br />

woman work and supervise her children and manage her home affairs at the same time? The<br />

American women drifted in this course so excessively that a sort of vying with men will be the<br />

result.”[5]<br />

Presented by http://www.alhassanain.<strong>com</strong> & http://www.islamicblessings.<strong>com</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!