09.04.2013 Views

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

Appellant's Brief - Washington State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

difficulty speaking, was barely conscious when being held upright,<br />

and passed out immediately upon being placed on the couch.<br />

Officers were unable to rouse him enough to find out if Ms.<br />

Freeman was permitted to be in the trailer. (I123106 RP, pgs. 19-<br />

21, 23, 2735-36). He obviously was in no condition to protect<br />

himself if there was, in fact, someone in the trailer who would harm<br />

him or take his property. He may not have been in danger of dying<br />

from the alcohol, but he wasn't able to tend to his own physical<br />

needs, either. The trial court was correct in finding that the officers<br />

acted appropriately.<br />

d. Factors supporting the community caretaking function.<br />

The facts in this case amply support the trial court's findings<br />

of fact, as well as the factors underlying the emergency aid<br />

exception, as set forth in Johnson, supra, at 415. Johnson includes<br />

the emergency exception in the community caretaking function.<br />

(1) The officer subjectively believed that someone likely<br />

needed assistance for health or safety reasons. The officers who<br />

had to physically help Harold Briggs walk into his trailer<br />

subjectively believed he needed assistance for both health and<br />

safety reasons.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!