Download File
Download File Download File
A DRAMATIC CRITIC of youth in it; but his £100,000, Cyril's Success, and Our Girls, all of which were greatly in vogue for a considerable time after their production, have gone into the " Ewigkeit," with the lager beer of Hans Breitmann's " barty." Looking back at my notice of Cyril's Success, I see that I absurdly likened the wit of the comedy to that of The Rivals; but Byron's play is as dead as Scrooge's partner, while Sheridan's is good for another century, at least. [ 40 3
VI The Ephemeral Drama and the Enduring Drama INDEED, of all the big crowd of English playrights who produced dra- mas, always with extreme facility and sometimes with contemporaneous success, between 1845 and 1875, — excepting, of course. Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton, — every man but Robertson is to-day practi- cally obsolete. Not a single one of their works has a name that will survive the first quarter of this centur}'^, unless it be a sur- vival to be embalAied and entombed in an encyclopaedia. By 1925 the stage that knew these dramas will know them no more, and Time will have allowed their claims for recognition as literature by impartially pitching them all into his dust heap. [ 41 ]
- Page 8 and 9: Bit
- Page 10 and 11: COPYRIGHT, 1902, BY HENRY AUSTIN CL
- Page 13: NOTE The reader is informed of what
- Page 16 and 17: CONTENTS XVII. ADELAIDE NEILSON 1 5
- Page 19 and 20: REMINISCENCES OF A DRAMATIC CRITIC
- Page 21 and 22: INTRODUCTION and fascinating folk,
- Page 23 and 24: INTRODUCTION My equipment for my ta
- Page 25 and 26: II Spectacle, Farce, Melodrama, and
- Page 27 and 28: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO But what
- Page 29 and 30: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO men had c
- Page 31 and 32: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO with two
- Page 33 and 34: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO of the tr
- Page 35 and 36: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO a man of
- Page 37 and 38: THE STAGE FIFTY YEARS AGO bill of f
- Page 39 and 40: Ill The Worth and Impotence of Free
- Page 41 and 42: IMPOTENCE OF FREE CRITICISM hinting
- Page 43 and 44: IMPOTENCE OF FREE CRITICISM applaud
- Page 45 and 46: I IV Some Early Experiences and Mis
- Page 47 and 48: EXPERIENCES AND MISTAKES quent appl
- Page 49 and 50: EXPERIENCES AND MISTAKES outspoken
- Page 51 and 52: V Selwyn's Theatre and the Robert-
- Page 53 and 54: SELWYN'S THEATRE Sargent Curtis ; a
- Page 55 and 56: SELWYN'S THEATRE Colorado and the t
- Page 57: SELWYN'S THEATRE that of the life o
- Page 61 and 62: THE EPHEMERAL DRAMA culiar to their
- Page 63 and 64: THE EPHEMERAL DRAMA have no essenti
- Page 65 and 66: VII The Great Dramatic QyiNQiJENNiU
- Page 67 and 68: DRAMATIC Q_UINQ.UENNIUM ton : first
- Page 69 and 70: DRAMATIC CtUINQ^UENNIUM — by clos
- Page 71 and 72: VIII William Warren, Comedian BOSTO
- Page 73 and 74: WILLIAM WARREN presented in the dra
- Page 75 and 76: WILLIAM WARREN Apropos of the large
- Page 77 and 78: WILLIAM WARREN must submit to a rec
- Page 79 and 80: WILLIAM WARREN voiced organ. There
- Page 81 and 82: WILLIAM WARREN depth and suggestive
- Page 83 and 84: WILLIAM WARREN through a vast galle
- Page 85 and 86: WILLIAM WARREN Senator from Massach
- Page 87 and 88: TRAINING FOR THE STAGE any other th
- Page 89 and 90: TRAINING FOR THE STAGE actors, and
- Page 91 and 92: TRAINING FOR THE STAGE not brought
- Page 93 and 94: TRAINING FOR THE STAGE rade;" Mr. M
- Page 95 and 96: TOOLE AND MATHEWS Mrs. Rousby, who
- Page 97 and 98: TOOLE AND MATHEWS rapidity against
- Page 99 and 100: TOOLE AND MATHEWS finesse, and dext
- Page 103 and 104: CHARLOTTE CUSHMAN figure and homely
- Page 105 and 106: CHARLOTTE CUSHMAN was great, the ac
- Page 107 and 108: CHARLOTTE CUSHMAN act, has been dis
VI<br />
The Ephemeral Drama and the<br />
Enduring Drama<br />
INDEED,<br />
of all the big crowd of<br />
English playrights who produced dra-<br />
mas, always with extreme facility and<br />
sometimes with contemporaneous success,<br />
between 1845 and 1875, — excepting, of<br />
course. Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton, —<br />
every man but Robertson is to-day practi-<br />
cally obsolete. Not a single one of their<br />
works has a name that will survive the first<br />
quarter of this centur}'^, unless it be a sur-<br />
vival to be embalAied and entombed in an<br />
encyclopaedia. By 1925 the stage that knew<br />
these dramas will know them no more,<br />
and Time will have allowed their claims<br />
for recognition as literature by impartially<br />
pitching them all into his dust heap.<br />
[ 41 ]