09.04.2013 Views

Study of Technology for Detecting Pre-Ignition Conditions of ... - NIST

Study of Technology for Detecting Pre-Ignition Conditions of ... - NIST

Study of Technology for Detecting Pre-Ignition Conditions of ... - NIST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

msc-HG95-1145<br />

because a candidate signature must exist <strong>for</strong> each type <strong>of</strong> food if it is to have potential as input<br />

to a universal pre-cooking-fire sensor. Diverse range types were <strong>of</strong> interest because <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

variation in i~ition modes due to a proximate flame on the gas range, although in these<br />

experiments, the ranges functioned primarily as sources <strong>of</strong> heat. The use <strong>of</strong> the different ranges<br />

selected was expected to have some effect on the time lag <strong>of</strong> the behaviors <strong>of</strong> the recorded<br />

variables because <strong>of</strong> the varied levels <strong>of</strong> heat flux output associated with each range. The rangehood<br />

status was <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>for</strong> two reasons. l?irs~ the flow caused by an active range hood might<br />

obscure the signature(s) <strong>of</strong> interest preceding ignition. Second, the different flow patterns might<br />

alter entrainment <strong>of</strong> air wh~ch could effect the mechmism and location <strong>of</strong> ignition and thus the<br />

preceding set <strong>of</strong> signatures as well.<br />

The selected foods and ranges were chosen because they were typically used <strong>for</strong> cooking<br />

in households and were representative <strong>of</strong> cooking fire scenarios that have actually been reported.<br />

More uncommon range models, food types, and styles <strong>of</strong> cooking could have been tested, but<br />

their results are less relevant at this stage.<br />

2.1.1 Facility Constm~ion<br />

A small, stand-alone laboratory was built in Building 205, the Large-Fire Facility, at <strong>NIST</strong><br />

to acmmmodate these experiments. A schematic <strong>of</strong> the room is shown in Figure 1. The interior<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> the room are as follows: 3.66 m (12 ft) width, 2.44 m (8 ft) depth, and 2.44 m<br />

@ ft) height. The room was outfitted with double-tide doors, 163 cm (64 in) wide by 207 cm<br />

(81 in) high, and fluorescent lighting. Access holes were made <strong>for</strong> external supplies <strong>of</strong> electrical<br />

power and natural gas. The stmcture consists <strong>of</strong> 2.44 m (8 ft) lengths <strong>of</strong> 8.9 cm (3.5 in) by<br />

3.2 cm (1.3 in) galvanized steel studding on the outside with 40.6 cm (16 in) centers supporting<br />

1.3 cm (0.5 in) thick gypsum drywall with the interior painted white. A set <strong>of</strong> white wooden<br />

cabinets with overhead cupboards and a countertop with cupboards below were installed. A space<br />

in the center was reserved <strong>for</strong> range installation.<br />

A range hood (described in Section 2.1.2) was installed above the range location. A<br />

25.5 cm (10 in) wide by 8.9 cm (3.5 in) high rectangular hood duct passes through the wall<br />

directly behind the range hood to an elbow that transitions to a 15 cm (6 in) diameter round duct.<br />

The round duct is vertical <strong>for</strong> about 0.6 m (2 ft) where it connects to an elbow, traverses about<br />

1.8 m (6 ft) horizontally to another elbow where the end is directed upwards and is positioned<br />

approximately 10 cm (4 in) below a large 41 cm (16 in) diameter duct which connects to tie<br />

draft hood afterbmer system.<br />

A box hood, 188 cm (74 in) wide by 58 cm (23 in) deep by 91 cm (36 in) high, was<br />

constructed over the doorway to capture most <strong>of</strong> the smoke produced by the experiments. The<br />

hood was made <strong>of</strong> 9 mm (3/8 in) thick plywood. From 46 cm (18 in) above the bottom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hood to 67 cm (26.5 in), the width <strong>of</strong> the box tapers from 188 cm (74 in) to 30 cm (12 in). The -top<br />

24 cm (9.5 in) <strong>of</strong> the hood is 30 cm (12 in) wide by 58 cm (23 in) deep. The hood is<br />

connected at the side <strong>of</strong> the top section to a 20 cm @ in) diameter, 4.3 m (14 R) long duct which<br />

leads to a fan which pulls the exhaust into the duct <strong>of</strong> the afterburner system.<br />

Electrical power was provided from two sources. AH <strong>of</strong> the instimentition was supplied -<br />

120 V electricity from a portable electric sub-panel box with a 60 amp rating which split 240 V<br />

2<br />

.-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!