Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices
Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices
Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dear Mr. Frolov,<br />
The Secret of Antigravitation<br />
I haven't been cc'ing you on my latest work as I should<br />
have -- I've been feeling a bit guilty about it, and thought<br />
I should write to ask you how the magazine is coming<br />
along, and if there are any papers that I can submit to you.<br />
I will attach my editorial piece "Secrets of Antigravity" -<br />
- it is perhaps not the quality that I normally write, but<br />
more an opinion piece than my other work. Also, I have<br />
cc'd you on some interesting interviews I did with Russian<br />
Physicist Evgeny Podkletnov. Last week Dr. Eugene<br />
Podkletnov stunned the experimental AG community<br />
with the revelation that his Superconductng Force-Beam<br />
Generator was producing an output in excess of hundreds<br />
of pounds of pure gravitational force. We've just finished<br />
a follow-up interview with Podkletnov to learn more<br />
about the results that he's been getting, and we're amazed<br />
to say that the more we learn, the more impressive his<br />
experiments become: Podkletnov claims that the<br />
gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5 megavolt drop<br />
onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed<br />
in a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around<br />
the apparatus. Pulses are powerful enough to punch<br />
through brick, concrete, and deform light-metals "like<br />
hitting it with a sledgehammer". The beam doesn't<br />
disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been<br />
measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers, and seems to<br />
penetrate all materials without a decrease in force. These<br />
are only a few of the details that he provides as we cover<br />
listener questions in this follow-up interview.<br />
Original Interview (High-Quality) WinMedia Audio [1<br />
mb]<br />
http://www.intalek.com/AV/Eugene-Podkletnov.wma<br />
Additional information is online at:<br />
http://www.americanantigravity.com/<br />
gravitywaves.shtml<br />
You can reach Podkletnov directly via email at:<br />
epodkletnov@hotmail.com<br />
Sincerely;<br />
Tim Ventura<br />
http://www.americanantigravity.com<br />
tventura6@comcast.net<br />
Tim Ventura<br />
http://www.americanantigravity.com<br />
tventura6@comcast.net<br />
Phone: 425-820-5675 Mobile: 425-260-4<strong>17</strong>5<br />
Community of Mind<br />
A lot of what I do on a day to day basis consists<br />
of talking to experts in the field of gravity<br />
research – not only am I interested in learning<br />
more about the formal work that they’ve done,<br />
but I also like to hear about their thoughts and<br />
opinions as to “what makes gravity tick” – ie:<br />
the gut feelings that they have about what<br />
works and doesn’t in the realm of antigravity<br />
research.<br />
I’ve talked to a very diverse group of people<br />
working on many aspects of this technology –<br />
from Tom Bearden on the electronics and<br />
engineering side of things to Bob Lazar with<br />
relation to his supposed work on UFO systems<br />
for the government in the late 80’s. I’ve talked<br />
to a diverse mixture of ‘formal scientists’,<br />
inventors, and other people with input on the<br />
subject and expertise to give them valuable<br />
input. What I’ve learned doesn’t come from any<br />
one single source, but is instead a composite<br />
from a group of different people working<br />
towards a singular goal – they compose a<br />
“community of mind” that lends its expertise<br />
to moving the goal of antigravity research<br />
forward.<br />
The Limits of Science<br />
In the interest of fairness, I should state the<br />
Antigravity research really falls outside of<br />
conventional science. A lot of new people to AG<br />
research (including the ‘general interest’<br />
segment of the public) have the impression that<br />
84 New <strong>Energy</strong> Technologies, <strong>Issue</strong> #3(18) 2004