09.04.2013 Views

Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices

Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices

Issue 17 - Free-Energy Devices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dear Mr. Frolov,<br />

The Secret of Antigravitation<br />

I haven't been cc'ing you on my latest work as I should<br />

have -- I've been feeling a bit guilty about it, and thought<br />

I should write to ask you how the magazine is coming<br />

along, and if there are any papers that I can submit to you.<br />

I will attach my editorial piece "Secrets of Antigravity" -<br />

- it is perhaps not the quality that I normally write, but<br />

more an opinion piece than my other work. Also, I have<br />

cc'd you on some interesting interviews I did with Russian<br />

Physicist Evgeny Podkletnov. Last week Dr. Eugene<br />

Podkletnov stunned the experimental AG community<br />

with the revelation that his Superconductng Force-Beam<br />

Generator was producing an output in excess of hundreds<br />

of pounds of pure gravitational force. We've just finished<br />

a follow-up interview with Podkletnov to learn more<br />

about the results that he's been getting, and we're amazed<br />

to say that the more we learn, the more impressive his<br />

experiments become: Podkletnov claims that the<br />

gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5 megavolt drop<br />

onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed<br />

in a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around<br />

the apparatus. Pulses are powerful enough to punch<br />

through brick, concrete, and deform light-metals "like<br />

hitting it with a sledgehammer". The beam doesn't<br />

disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been<br />

measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers, and seems to<br />

penetrate all materials without a decrease in force. These<br />

are only a few of the details that he provides as we cover<br />

listener questions in this follow-up interview.<br />

Original Interview (High-Quality) WinMedia Audio [1<br />

mb]<br />

http://www.intalek.com/AV/Eugene-Podkletnov.wma<br />

Additional information is online at:<br />

http://www.americanantigravity.com/<br />

gravitywaves.shtml<br />

You can reach Podkletnov directly via email at:<br />

epodkletnov@hotmail.com<br />

Sincerely;<br />

Tim Ventura<br />

http://www.americanantigravity.com<br />

tventura6@comcast.net<br />

Tim Ventura<br />

http://www.americanantigravity.com<br />

tventura6@comcast.net<br />

Phone: 425-820-5675 Mobile: 425-260-4<strong>17</strong>5<br />

Community of Mind<br />

A lot of what I do on a day to day basis consists<br />

of talking to experts in the field of gravity<br />

research – not only am I interested in learning<br />

more about the formal work that they’ve done,<br />

but I also like to hear about their thoughts and<br />

opinions as to “what makes gravity tick” – ie:<br />

the gut feelings that they have about what<br />

works and doesn’t in the realm of antigravity<br />

research.<br />

I’ve talked to a very diverse group of people<br />

working on many aspects of this technology –<br />

from Tom Bearden on the electronics and<br />

engineering side of things to Bob Lazar with<br />

relation to his supposed work on UFO systems<br />

for the government in the late 80’s. I’ve talked<br />

to a diverse mixture of ‘formal scientists’,<br />

inventors, and other people with input on the<br />

subject and expertise to give them valuable<br />

input. What I’ve learned doesn’t come from any<br />

one single source, but is instead a composite<br />

from a group of different people working<br />

towards a singular goal – they compose a<br />

“community of mind” that lends its expertise<br />

to moving the goal of antigravity research<br />

forward.<br />

The Limits of Science<br />

In the interest of fairness, I should state the<br />

Antigravity research really falls outside of<br />

conventional science. A lot of new people to AG<br />

research (including the ‘general interest’<br />

segment of the public) have the impression that<br />

84 New <strong>Energy</strong> Technologies, <strong>Issue</strong> #3(18) 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!