the perfectionist: an interview with playwright tony kushner

the perfectionist: an interview with playwright tony kushner the perfectionist: an interview with playwright tony kushner

culturaljudaism.org
from culturaljudaism.org More from this publisher
08.04.2013 Views

16 But in calling yourself a Jewish writer, aren’t you also implying that Jewishness informs your art? You’ve even referred to “Angels in America”—your masterwork—as a Jewish play. I think you could trace certain themes or aspects that owe something to Jewish intellectual and dramatic traditions and gay traditions. Angels is explicitly [Jewish]—I didn’t intend it to be when I first started writing it, it just sort of came out that way. There’s a very powerful spine of the play that is this sort of tracking the Jewish characters. But I also think that a play like Homebody/Kabul, or the play that I’m working on right now—which has no Jews in it—are Jewish plays. Homebody/Kabul also has no gay people in it, but I consider it to be, in a certain sense, a “gay” play, in the sense that it’s written by a gay Jew and an American gay Jew. You seldom compartmentalize your art and your identity-based politics. I’ve really come to feel that any categorization like political, spiritual—that these things are all so murky. There is some level on which these are simply different perspectives from which to view the same problem. And the problem is never viewable if you refuse access entirely to any one of the numerous frameworks, any one of the numerous discourses. If you try and understand politics and you have no understanding of psychology, or for that matter spirituality, or philosophy, or history, you’re going to be a [expletive] politician. If you try to write about people, and pay no attention to what’s happening in the world around them—or try and write about God… I mean, go look at Isaiah. The bible is political. The prophets are full of it: Don’t [expletive] over the poor. Don’t be a greedy pig. Make sure that you behave in the world in a decent fashion. In fact, it’s perfectly le- gitimate to say that, in a certain sense, Judaism doesn’t ask you to do anything other than that. Do those things, and the rest of it—whatever. I read somewhere about your affection—I think you described it almost in terms of kinship—for the Yiddish playwright S. Ansky. As the story goes, you adapted “The Dybbuk” after hearing a Yiddish poem and being struck by the sonorousness of it. Do you recall that moment? Was it really an ur-moment in the gestation of the play? Vanessa Redgrave did a benefit for Sarajevo, and she had, among many other people, an old Yiddishspeaking actress. It was incredible…I remember the word “shtein” kept coming up. Possibly, she was going through the names of both shtetls of Eastern Europe and the names of the camps, and after each one she would say shtein. It was stunningly beautiful. And it did have a sound in Yiddish that I wasn’t…it was just like when I listened to the Klezmatics for the first time and heard that kind of very sexy, very lyrical sound— a kind of lyrical and voluptuous sound that I wasn’t accustomed to in the Yiddish that I took here, which was mostly sayings and curses. Yiddish you’d learned from your grandmother. My grandmother, Sarah, and then my mother and her sisters. I would pick up bits and pieces. You know, I just did the introduction to Sholem Aleichem’s novel, Wandering Stars, it’s a Yiddish theatre novel, and it’s staggering the way it’s full of the most outrageous curses. My favorite is “Go bake bagels in hell.” There’s just an endless talent for invective. There’s a great deal of rage caught up in it, which is one of the things that’s really interesting.

But rage that’s sublimated into comically-tinted idioms. Beautifully and partially sublimated, because a lot of it is left as it is, which gives it its power. is never…I mean, unless everybody’s dead, it’s always unstable. It’s always transforming. And in the unfixity of things, there’s the possibility of transformation into something else. Unless it’s “Endgame.” And even “Endgame”—I mean, what could be bleaker than the On a perhaps related note, your contempt for President Bush is well known. But you’ve also, and quite often, spoken about the need to avoid despair about politics. To rally, in fact. Is there a contradiction, then, between the citizen’s responsibility—to remain hopeful—and the artist’s responsibility—to tell the truth even in un-hopeful times? There’s this great line of W. H. Auden’s: “Sing of human unsuccess/In a rapture of distress.” In fact, in a way, art’s job is not to reassure you, and tell you “listen, it’s all gonna be fine, don’t worry,” but to say, Oh my God, things couldn’t be worse. The greatest political play of the 20th ending of that completely perfect play? And yet, it’s so astonishingly beautiful—one hundred million times more alight and incandescent with light at the end, even though it’s showing you the end of the world, basically. Changing subjects slightly, I know that you see major issues—gay rights; social and economic justice; secularism—as interwoven. How does the last one—secularism—fit into this matrix? What’s the role of secularism in a progressive politics? century is “Mother Courage,” and not with Kattrin breaking up the town, but with her death, and her mother’s grief, and then her mother It’s the thing that makes it possible. There’s no such There’s no such thing thing as pluralist democracy without secular pluralist democracy. The minute re- as pluralist democracy ligion begins to establish itself as an integral part of without secular the democratic equation, the democratic equation pluralist democracy. ceases to be. I think that alone. Now that is the sad- would be true if everybody dest image, or one of the was Buddhist. The idea that saddest images, in all of Western drama. And you you’re creating a space in which religious difference is should be shattered by the end of the play. And then, tolerated is predicated on the idea that you’re creating like any nightmare, the job of standing up and de- a space in which religion doesn’t exist. Which is the ciding what you’re going to do with the nightmare thing that seems to be so challenging to people on the you’ve had is up to you. Right in this country at this point. Also, the job of being an artist is to represent re- I feel that the things that I advocate—the pursuit ality as fully as possible. I do believe that as long as of social and economic justice, and the pursuit of there’s life, if you really represent the world fully, you’ll progress in a secular, pluralist, multicultural democ- find an occasion for genuine hope. Because the world racy—contains within it the only hope that I can see. 17

But rage that’s sublimated into comically-tinted<br />

idioms.<br />

Beautifully <strong>an</strong>d partially sublimated, because a lot of<br />

it is left as it is, which gives it its power.<br />

is never…I me<strong>an</strong>, unless everybody’s dead, it’s always<br />

unstable. It’s always tr<strong>an</strong>sforming. And in <strong>the</strong> unfixity<br />

of things, <strong>the</strong>re’s <strong>the</strong> possibility of tr<strong>an</strong>sformation<br />

into something else. Unless it’s “Endgame.” And even<br />

“Endgame”—I me<strong>an</strong>, what could be bleaker th<strong>an</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

On a perhaps related note, your contempt for<br />

President Bush is well known. But you’ve also, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

quite often, spoken about <strong>the</strong> need to avoid despair<br />

about politics. To rally, in fact. Is <strong>the</strong>re a<br />

contradiction, <strong>the</strong>n, between <strong>the</strong> citizen’s responsibility—to<br />

remain hopeful—<strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> artist’s<br />

responsibility—to tell <strong>the</strong> truth even in un-hopeful<br />

times?<br />

There’s this great line of W. H. Auden’s: “Sing of<br />

hum<strong>an</strong> unsuccess/In a rapture of distress.” In fact, in<br />

a way, art’s job is not to reassure you, <strong>an</strong>d tell you “listen,<br />

it’s all gonna be fine,<br />

don’t worry,” but to say, Oh<br />

my God, things couldn’t be<br />

worse. The greatest political<br />

play of <strong>the</strong> 20th ending of that completely perfect play? And yet, it’s<br />

so astonishingly beautiful—one hundred million<br />

times more alight <strong>an</strong>d inc<strong>an</strong>descent <strong>with</strong> light at <strong>the</strong><br />

end, even though it’s showing you <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

world, basically.<br />

Ch<strong>an</strong>ging subjects slightly, I know that you see<br />

major issues—gay rights; social <strong>an</strong>d economic<br />

justice; secularism—as interwoven. How does <strong>the</strong><br />

last one—secularism—fit into this matrix? What’s<br />

<strong>the</strong> role of secularism in a progressive politics?<br />

century<br />

is “Mo<strong>the</strong>r Courage,” <strong>an</strong>d<br />

not <strong>with</strong> Kattrin breaking<br />

up <strong>the</strong> town, but <strong>with</strong> her<br />

death, <strong>an</strong>d her mo<strong>the</strong>r’s<br />

grief, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong>n her mo<strong>the</strong>r <br />

It’s <strong>the</strong> thing that makes<br />

it possible. There’s no such<br />

There’s no such thing thing as pluralist democracy<br />

<strong>with</strong>out secular pluralist<br />

democracy. The minute re-<br />

as pluralist democracy<br />

ligion begins to establish<br />

itself as <strong>an</strong> integral part of<br />

<strong>with</strong>out secular<br />

<strong>the</strong> democratic equation,<br />

<strong>the</strong> democratic equation<br />

pluralist democracy.<br />

ceases to be. I think that<br />

alone. Now that is <strong>the</strong> sad-<br />

would be true if everybody<br />

dest image, or one of <strong>the</strong><br />

was Buddhist. The idea that<br />

saddest images, in all of Western drama. And you you’re creating a space in which religious difference is<br />

should be shattered by <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> play. And <strong>the</strong>n, tolerated is predicated on <strong>the</strong> idea that you’re creating<br />

like <strong>an</strong>y nightmare, <strong>the</strong> job of st<strong>an</strong>ding up <strong>an</strong>d de- a space in which religion doesn’t exist. Which is <strong>the</strong><br />

ciding what you’re going to do <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> nightmare thing that seems to be so challenging to people on <strong>the</strong><br />

you’ve had is up to you.<br />

Right in this country at this point.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong> job of being <strong>an</strong> artist is to represent re- I feel that <strong>the</strong> things that I advocate—<strong>the</strong> pursuit<br />

ality as fully as possible. I do believe that as long as of social <strong>an</strong>d economic justice, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> pursuit of<br />

<strong>the</strong>re’s life, if you really represent <strong>the</strong> world fully, you’ll progress in a secular, pluralist, multicultural democ-<br />

find <strong>an</strong> occasion for genuine hope. Because <strong>the</strong> world racy—contains <strong>with</strong>in it <strong>the</strong> only hope that I c<strong>an</strong> see.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!