Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, California, USA, paper No. 1789. Spudich, P., W.B. Joyner, A.G. Lindh, D.M. Boore, B.M. Margaris, and J.B. Fletcher, SEA99: a revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 89, p. 1156-1170. Silva, W., 2004, Site response simulations for the PEER-NGA project, Draft report to the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, with updated results in 2005. Toro G.R., 1981, Biases in seismic ground motion prediction, Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, 133 p. Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, K.J., 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 84, p. 974-1002. Youngs, R.R., 1993, Soil amplification and vertical to horizontal ratios for analysis of strong motion data from active tectonic regions, Appendix 2C in Guidelines for Determining Design Basis Ground Motions, Vol. 2: Appendices for Ground Motion Estimation, EPRI Report TR- 102293. C&Y2006 Page 71
Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA Flatfile Version 7.2 Used in Developing Chiou and Youngs 2006 Empirical Ground Motion Model RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, Station 12 0012 Kern County 7.36 24303 LA - Hollywood Stor FF 23 0020 San Francisco 5.28 1117 Golden Gate Park 28 0025 Parkfield 6.19 1016 Cholame - Shandon Array #12 30 0025 Parkfield 6.19 1014 Cholame - Shandon Array #5 31 0025 Parkfield 6.19 1015 Cholame - Shandon Array #8 33 0025 Parkfield 6.19 1438 Temblor pre-1969 37 0028 Borrego Mtn 6.63 24303 LA - Hollywood Stor FF 40 0028 Borrego Mtn 6.63 280 San Onofre - So Cal Edison 41 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 24278 Castaic - Old Ridge Route 42 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 112 Cedar Springs Pumphouse 43 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 111 Cedar Springs, Allen Ranch 44 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 113 Colton - So Cal Edison 45 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 620 Devil's Canyon 46 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 24303 LA - Hollywood Stor FF 47 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 24271 Lake Hughes #1 48 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 278 Puddingstone Dam (Abutment) 49 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 104 Santa Anita Dam 50 0029 Lytle Creek 5.33 290 Wrightwood - 6074 Park Dr 51 0030 San Fernando 6.61 411 2516 Via Tejon PV 52 0030 San Fernando 6.61 103 Anza Post Office 54 0030 San Fernando 6.61 105 Borrego Springs Fire Sta 55 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1 Buena Vista - Taft 56 0030 San Fernando 6.61 108 Carbon Canyon Dam 57 0030 San Fernando 6.61 24278 Castaic - Old Ridge Route 58 0030 San Fernando 6.61 112 Cedar Springs Pumphouse 59 0030 San Fernando 6.61 111 Cedar Springs, Allen Ranch 60 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1013 Cholame - Shandon Array #2 61 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1015 Cholame - Shandon Array #8 62 0030 San Fernando 6.61 113 Colton - So Cal Edison 63 0030 San Fernando 6.61 121 Fairmont Dam 64 0030 San Fernando 6.61 998 Fort Tejon 65 0030 San Fernando 6.61 994 Gormon - Oso Pump Plant 66 0030 San Fernando 6.61 12331 Hemet Fire Station 67 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1035 Isabella Dam (Aux Abut) 68 0030 San Fernando 6.61 24303 LA - Hollywood Stor FF 70 0030 San Fernando 6.61 24271 Lake Hughes #1 71 0030 San Fernando 6.61 128 Lake Hughes #12 72 0030 San Fernando 6.61 126 Lake Hughes #4 73 0030 San Fernando 6.61 127 Lake Hughes #9 74 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1041 Maricopa Array #1 75 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1042 Maricopa Array #2 76 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1043 Maricopa Array #3 77 0030 San Fernando 6.61 279 Pacoima Dam (upper left abut) 78 0030 San Fernando 6.61 262 Palmdale Fire Station 81 0030 San Fernando 6.61 269 Pearblossom Pump 82 0030 San Fernando 6.61 272 Port Hueneme 83 0030 San Fernando 6.61 278 Puddingstone Dam (Abutment) 84 0030 San Fernando 6.61 314 San Diego Gas & Electric 85 0030 San Fernando 6.61 465 San Juan Capistrano 86 0030 San Fernando 6.61 280 San Onofre - So Cal Edison 87 0030 San Fernando 6.61 104 Santa Anita Dam 88 0030 San Fernando 6.61 285 Santa Felita Dam (Outlet) 89 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1027 Tehachapi Pump 91 0030 San Fernando 6.61 287 Upland - San Antonio Dam 92 0030 San Fernando 6.61 1102 Wheeler Ridge - Ground 93 0030 San Fernando 6.61 289 Whittier Narrows Dam 94 0030 San Fernando 6.61 290 Wrightwood - 6074 Park Dr 95 0031 Managua, Nicaragua-01 6.24 3501 Managua, ESSO 96 0032 Managua, Nicaragua-02 5.2 3501 Managua, ESSO 97 0033 Point Mugu 5.65 272 Port Hueneme 98 0034 Hollister-03 5.14 47379 Gilroy Array #1 100 0034 Hollister-03 5.14 47126 San Juan Bautista, 24 Polk St 106 0036 Oroville-01 5.89 1051 Oroville Seismograph Station C&Y2006, Appendix A A-1
- Page 21 and 22: allows the interpretation of the co
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 13: Coefficients resulting f
- Page 25 and 26: the top of rupture located at x = 0
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 18: Intra-event residuals fo
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 21: Variation of HW* with ma
- Page 31 and 32: The interpretation of the parameter
- Page 33 and 34: to the PEER-NGA pga data selected f
- Page 35 and 36: EFFECT OF DATA TRUNCATION The initi
- Page 37 and 38: term [ 1 Φ( y ( θ ) + τ ⋅ z ,
- Page 39 and 40: Table 4: Estimate of Anelastic Atte
- Page 41 and 42: data truncated at a maximum distanc
- Page 43 and 44: faulting earthquakes at long period
- Page 45 and 46: Slope -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.
- Page 47 and 48: C&Y2006 Page 46 Table 5: Coefficien
- Page 49 and 50: c1 of T0.010S c1 of T1.000S MODEL R
- Page 51 and 52: esid 1 0 -1 -2 resid resid 1 0 -1 -
- Page 53 and 54: esid resid resid 1 0 -1 -2 1 0 -1 -
- Page 55 and 56: esid 2 1 0 -1 -2 SCEC Version 2 0 2
- Page 57 and 58: Amplification w.r.t. Vs30 = 1130 m/
- Page 59 and 60: Sa(g) Sa(g) 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1
- Page 61 and 62: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.00
- Page 63 and 64: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.
- Page 65 and 66: EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORTRAN routin
- Page 67 and 68: Table 6: Example Calculations Perio
- Page 69 and 70: REFERENCES Abrahamson, N.A., and Si
- Page 71: Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell
- Page 75 and 76: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, USA, paper<br />
No. 1789.<br />
Spudich, P., W.B. Joyner, A.G. Lindh, D.M. Boore, B.M. Margaris, <strong>and</strong> J.B. Fletcher, SEA99: a<br />
revised ground motion prediction relation <strong>for</strong> use in extensional tectonic regimes, Bulletin of<br />
the Seismological Society of America, v. 89, p. 1156-1170.<br />
Silva, W., 2004, Site response simulations <strong>for</strong> the <strong>PEER</strong>-<strong>NGA</strong> project, Draft report to the Pacific<br />
Earthquake Engineering Research Center, with updated results in 2005.<br />
Toro G.R., 1981, Biases in seismic ground motion prediction, Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng.,<br />
Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, 133 p.<br />
Wells, D.L., <strong>and</strong> Coppersmith, K.J., 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture<br />
length, rupture width, rupture area, <strong>and</strong> surface displacement, Bulletin of the Seismological<br />
Society of America, v. 84, p. 974-1002.<br />
<strong>Youngs</strong>, R.R., 1993, Soil amplification <strong>and</strong> vertical to horizontal ratios <strong>for</strong> analysis of strong motion<br />
data from active tectonic regions, Appendix 2C in Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Determining Design Basis<br />
<strong>Ground</strong> <strong>Motion</strong>s, Vol. 2: Appendices <strong>for</strong> <strong>Ground</strong> <strong>Motion</strong> Estimation, EPRI Report TR-<br />
102293.<br />
C&Y2006 Page 71
Change language