Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Boore, D.M., W.B, Joyner, and T.E. Fumal, 1997, Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes–A summary of recent work, Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, p. 128-153. Boore, D.M., J. Watson-Lamprey, and N.A. Abrahamson, 2006 (in press), Orientation-independent measures of ground motion, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 96, in press. Bragato, P.L., 2004, Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 94, p. 1369-1378. Brillinger, D.R., and H.K. Preisler, 1984, An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 74, p. 1441-1450. Brune, J., 1970, Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 75, p. 4997-5009. Brune, J., 1971, Correction, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 76, p. 5002. Campbell, K.W., 1993, Empirical prediction of near-source ground motion from large earthquakes, Proceedings International Workshop on Earthquake Hazards and Large Dams in the Himalaya, January 15-16, New Deli India. Campbell, K.W., 1997, Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra, Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, p. 154-179. Campbell, K., 2003, Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 93, p. 1012-1033. Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia, 2003, Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.93, p. 314-331. Chiou, S.-J., F.I. Makdisi, and R.R. Youngs, 2000, Style-of-faulting and footwall/hanging wall effects on strong ground motion, FY 1995 NEHRP Award Number 1434-95-G-2614, final report, 21 p. Choi, Y., and J.P. Stewart, 2003, nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity, Earthquake Spectra, v. 21, p. 1-30. Day, S.M., J. Bielak, D. Dreger, R. Graves, S. Larson, K.B. Olsen, A. Pitarka, and L. Ramirez- Guzman, 2006, Numerical simulation of basin effects on long-period ground motion, Proceedings of the 8 th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, California, USA, paper No. 1857. EPRI, 1993, Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions, Electric Power Research Institute Report EPRI TR-102293, Vol. 1. Erickson, D., D.E. McNamara, and H.M. Benz, 2004, Frequency-dependent Lg Q within the continental United States, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.94, p. 1630- 1643. C&Y2006 Page 69
Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell, J. Mori, L. Seeber, and E. Cranswick, 1990, Attenuation of highfrequency shear waves in the crust, measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern California, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 95, p. 17,441-17,457. Fukushima, Y., and T. Tanaka, 1990, A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 80, p. 757-783. Fukushima, Y., K. Irikura, T. Uetake, and H. Matsumoto, 2000, Characteristics of observed peak amplitude for strong ground motion from the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, p. 545-565. Geomatrix, 1995, Seismic design mapping State of Oregon: Report prepared for the Oregon Department of Transportation, Personal Services Contract 11688, Geomatrix Consultants Project No. 2442, January. Idriss, I.M., 1991, Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report No. NIST GCR 93-625. Idriss, I.M., (2002) Personal Communication. Magistrale, H., S.M. Day, R. Clayton, and R.W. Graves, 2000, The SCEC southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, p. S65-S76. Mai, P.M., P. Spudich, and J. Boatwright, 2005, Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 95, p. 965-980. Raoof, M., R. Herrmann, and L. Malagnini, 1999, Attenuation and excitation of three-component ground motion in southern California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.89, p. 888-902. Sabetta, F., and Pugliese, A., 1996, Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 86, p. 337- 352. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F.I., and Youngs, R.R., 1997, Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data, Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 1, p. 180-189. Sibson, R. H., and Xie, G., 1998, Dip range for intracontinental reverse fault ruptures: Truth not stranger than friction, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 88, p. 1014-1022. Silva, W.C., Abrahamson, N., Toro, G., and Costantino, C., 1996, Description and validation of the stochastic ground motion model: Report submitted to Brookhaven National Laboratory, Associated Universities, Inc., New York (available at www.pacificengineering.org). Somerville, P.G., and N.A. Abrahamson, 1995, Prediction of ground motions for thrust earthquakes, Report to the California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP). Somerville, P., N. Collins, R. Graves, A. Pitarka, W. Silva, and Y. Zeng, 2006, Simulation of ground motion scaling characteristics for the NGA-E project, Proceedings of the 8 th National C&Y2006 Page 70
- Page 19 and 20: C4+C5M slowly and the value of the
- Page 21 and 22: allows the interpretation of the co
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 13: Coefficients resulting f
- Page 25 and 26: the top of rupture located at x = 0
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 18: Intra-event residuals fo
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 21: Variation of HW* with ma
- Page 31 and 32: The interpretation of the parameter
- Page 33 and 34: to the PEER-NGA pga data selected f
- Page 35 and 36: EFFECT OF DATA TRUNCATION The initi
- Page 37 and 38: term [ 1 Φ( y ( θ ) + τ ⋅ z ,
- Page 39 and 40: Table 4: Estimate of Anelastic Atte
- Page 41 and 42: data truncated at a maximum distanc
- Page 43 and 44: faulting earthquakes at long period
- Page 45 and 46: Slope -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.
- Page 47 and 48: C&Y2006 Page 46 Table 5: Coefficien
- Page 49 and 50: c1 of T0.010S c1 of T1.000S MODEL R
- Page 51 and 52: esid 1 0 -1 -2 resid resid 1 0 -1 -
- Page 53 and 54: esid resid resid 1 0 -1 -2 1 0 -1 -
- Page 55 and 56: esid 2 1 0 -1 -2 SCEC Version 2 0 2
- Page 57 and 58: Amplification w.r.t. Vs30 = 1130 m/
- Page 59 and 60: Sa(g) Sa(g) 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1
- Page 61 and 62: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.00
- Page 63 and 64: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.
- Page 65 and 66: EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORTRAN routin
- Page 67 and 68: Table 6: Example Calculations Perio
- Page 69: REFERENCES Abrahamson, N.A., and Si
- Page 73 and 74: Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA
- Page 75 and 76: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell, J. Mori, L. Seeber, <strong>and</strong> E. Cranswick, 1990, Attenuation of highfrequency<br />
shear waves in the crust, measurements from New York State, South Africa, <strong>and</strong><br />
southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 95, p. 17,441-17,457.<br />
Fukushima, Y., <strong>and</strong> T. Tanaka, 1990, A new attenuation relation <strong>for</strong> peak horizontal acceleration of<br />
strong earthquake ground motion in Japan, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,<br />
v. 80, p. 757-783.<br />
Fukushima, Y., K. Irikura, T. Uetake, <strong>and</strong> H. Matsumoto, 2000, Characteristics of observed peak<br />
amplitude <strong>for</strong> strong ground motion from the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake,<br />
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, p. 545-565.<br />
Geomatrix, 1995, Seismic design mapping State of Oregon: Report prepared <strong>for</strong> the Oregon<br />
Department of Transportation, Personal Services Contract 11688, Geomatrix Consultants<br />
Project No. 2442, January.<br />
Idriss, I.M., 1991, Procedures <strong>for</strong> selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites, National Institute<br />
of St<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> Technology, Report No. NIST GCR 93-625.<br />
Idriss, I.M., (2002) Personal Communication.<br />
Magistrale, H., S.M. Day, R. Clayton, <strong>and</strong> R.W. Graves, 2000, The SCEC southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />
reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2, Bulletin of the Seismological<br />
Society of America, v. 90, p. S65-S76.<br />
Mai, P.M., P. Spudich, <strong>and</strong> J. Boatwright, 2005, Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models,<br />
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 95, p. 965-980.<br />
Raoof, M., R. Herrmann, <strong>and</strong> L. Malagnini, 1999, Attenuation <strong>and</strong> excitation of three-component<br />
ground motion in southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.89,<br />
p. 888-902.<br />
Sabetta, F., <strong>and</strong> Pugliese, A., 1996, Estimation of response spectra <strong>and</strong> simulation of nonstationary<br />
earthquake ground motions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 86, p. 337-<br />
352.<br />
Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F.I., <strong>and</strong> <strong>Youngs</strong>, R.R., 1997, Attenuation<br />
relationships <strong>for</strong> shallow crustal earthquakes based on Cali<strong>for</strong>nia strong motion data,<br />
Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 1, p. 180-189.<br />
Sibson, R. H., <strong>and</strong> Xie, G., 1998, Dip range <strong>for</strong> intracontinental reverse fault ruptures: Truth not<br />
stranger than friction, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 88, p. 1014-1022.<br />
Silva, W.C., Abrahamson, N., Toro, G., <strong>and</strong> Costantino, C., 1996, Description <strong>and</strong> validation of the<br />
stochastic ground motion model: Report submitted to Brookhaven National Laboratory,<br />
Associated Universities, Inc., New York (available at www.pacificengineering.org).<br />
Somerville, P.G., <strong>and</strong> N.A. Abrahamson, 1995, Prediction of ground motions <strong>for</strong> thrust earthquakes,<br />
Report to the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Strong <strong>Motion</strong> Instrumentation Program (CSMIP).<br />
Somerville, P., N. Collins, R. Graves, A. Pitarka, W. Silva, <strong>and</strong> Y. Zeng, 2006, Simulation of ground<br />
motion scaling characteristics <strong>for</strong> the <strong>NGA</strong>-E project, Proceedings of the 8 th National<br />
C&Y2006 Page 70
Change language