In making such adjustments, we would stress the need <strong>for</strong> the user to obtain estimates of Q <strong>for</strong> the two regions that are based on consistent geometric spreading models. The site response portion of the ground motion model was constructed to <strong>for</strong>ce all ground motions to be the same <strong>for</strong> VS30 greater than 1130 m/s. As the rock velocity increases we expect the shallow crustal damping (i.e. “kappa”) to decrease, resulting in increases in high frequency motions. Data <strong>for</strong> such sites are not present in the <strong>PEER</strong>-<strong>NGA</strong> data base <strong>and</strong> this effect is not captured in our model. The model was developed using recordings from earthquakes with a maximum depth to top of rupture of 15 km <strong>and</strong> a maximum hypocentral depth of 19 km. The model predicts a linear increase in ln(psa) with increasing ZTOR over this range. Application of the model in regions with very thick crust (e.g. >> 20 km) is an extrapolation outside of the range of data used to develop the model parameters. C&Y2006 Page 67
REFERENCES Abrahamson, N.A., <strong>and</strong> Silva, W.J., 1997, <strong>Empirical</strong> response spectral attenuation relations <strong>for</strong> shallow crustal earthquakes, Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, p. 94-127. Abrahamson, N.A., <strong>and</strong> P.G. Somerville, 1996, Effects of the hanging wall <strong>and</strong> footwall on the ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.86, p. S93-S99. Ambraseys, N.N, Simpson, K.A., <strong>and</strong> Bommer, J.J, 1996, Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe, Earthquake Engineering <strong>and</strong> Structural Dynamics, v. 25, p. 371-400. Ambraseys, N.N., J Douglas, S.K. Sarma1, <strong>and</strong> P.M. Smit, 2005, Equations <strong>for</strong> the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe <strong>and</strong> the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration <strong>and</strong> spectral acceleration, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, v 3, p. 1-35. Atkinson, G.M., 1989, Attenuation of the Lg phase <strong>and</strong> site response <strong>for</strong> the Eastern Canada Telemetered Network, Seismological Research Letters, v.60, n. 2, p. 59-69. Atkinson, G.M. <strong>and</strong> R. Mereu, 1992, The shape of ground motion attenuation curves in southeastern Canada, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.82, p. 2014-2031. Atkinson, G.M. <strong>and</strong> W. Silva, 1997, An empirical study of earthquake source spectra <strong>for</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.87, p. 97-113. Atkinson, G.M. <strong>and</strong> W. Silva, 2000, Stochastic modeling of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia ground motions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.90, p. 255-274. Bazzurro, P. <strong>and</strong> C.A. Cornell, 2004, <strong>Ground</strong>-motion amplification in nonlinear soil sites with uncertain properties, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.94, p. 2090-2109. Boatwright, J., H. Bundock, J. Luetgert, L. Seekins, L. Gee, <strong>and</strong> P. Lombard, 2003, The dependence of PGA <strong>and</strong> PGV on distance <strong>and</strong> magnitude inferred from northern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia ShakeMap data, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 93, p. 2043-2055. Boore, D.M., 2003, Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure <strong>and</strong> Applied Geophysics, v. 160, p. 635-676. Boore, D.M., 2005, SMSIM – Fortran programs <strong>for</strong> simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 2.3-A revision of OFR 96-80-A: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-509, 15 August, 55 p. Boore, D.M. <strong>and</strong> W.B. Joyner, 1997, Site amplification <strong>for</strong> generic rock sites, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.87, p. 327-341. Boore, D.M., W.B, Joyner, <strong>and</strong> T.E. Fumal, 1993, Estimation of response spectra <strong>and</strong> peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: an interim report, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-509, 72 p. C&Y2006 Page 68
- Page 1 and 2:
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical
- Page 3 and 4:
data are consistent with strong mot
- Page 5 and 6:
Figure 1: Magnitude-distance-region
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure 2: Empirical ground motion d
- Page 9 and 10:
EQID Earthquake M Table 3: Inferred
- Page 11 and 12:
Site Average Shear Wave Velocity: A
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6: Relationship between VS30
- Page 15 and 16:
1 ) ∝ C2 × M + ( C2 − C ) × l
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 9: Peak acceleration data fr
- Page 19 and 20: C4+C5M slowly and the value of the
- Page 21 and 22: allows the interpretation of the co
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 13: Coefficients resulting f
- Page 25 and 26: the top of rupture located at x = 0
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 18: Intra-event residuals fo
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 21: Variation of HW* with ma
- Page 31 and 32: The interpretation of the parameter
- Page 33 and 34: to the PEER-NGA pga data selected f
- Page 35 and 36: EFFECT OF DATA TRUNCATION The initi
- Page 37 and 38: term [ 1 Φ( y ( θ ) + τ ⋅ z ,
- Page 39 and 40: Table 4: Estimate of Anelastic Atte
- Page 41 and 42: data truncated at a maximum distanc
- Page 43 and 44: faulting earthquakes at long period
- Page 45 and 46: Slope -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.
- Page 47 and 48: C&Y2006 Page 46 Table 5: Coefficien
- Page 49 and 50: c1 of T0.010S c1 of T1.000S MODEL R
- Page 51 and 52: esid 1 0 -1 -2 resid resid 1 0 -1 -
- Page 53 and 54: esid resid resid 1 0 -1 -2 1 0 -1 -
- Page 55 and 56: esid 2 1 0 -1 -2 SCEC Version 2 0 2
- Page 57 and 58: Amplification w.r.t. Vs30 = 1130 m/
- Page 59 and 60: Sa(g) Sa(g) 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1
- Page 61 and 62: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.00
- Page 63 and 64: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.
- Page 65 and 66: EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORTRAN routin
- Page 67: Table 6: Example Calculations Perio
- Page 71 and 72: Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell
- Page 73 and 74: Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA
- Page 75 and 76: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120:
RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure B-2: Data for aspect ratio v
- Page 125 and 126:
Probability . 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0
- Page 127 and 128:
Appendix C Estimation of Vs30 at CW
- Page 129 and 130:
Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 G
- Page 131 and 132:
Vs30 (m/sec) 1400 1200 1000 800 600
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution
- Page 135 and 136:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 137 and 138:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 139 and 140:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 141 and 142:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 143 and 144:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 145 and 146:
PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 147 and 148:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 149 and 150:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 151 and 152:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 153 and 154:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 155 and 156:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 157 and 158:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 159 and 160:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 161 and 162:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 163 and 164:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 165 and 166:
T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 167 and 168:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 169 and 170:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 171 and 172:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 173 and 174:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 175 and 176:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 177 and 178:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 179 and 180:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 181 and 182:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 183 and 184:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 185 and 186:
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 187 and 188:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 189 and 190:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 191 and 192:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 193 and 194:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 195 and 196:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 197 and 198:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 199 and 200:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 201 and 202:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 203 and 204:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
- Page 205 and 206:
T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1130 m/s 5
- Page 207 and 208:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 209 and 210:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 211 and 212:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 213 and 214:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 215 and 216:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 217 and 218:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
- Page 219:
T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0