Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 10 25 Period = 0.01 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 25 Magnitude Period = 1 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 Magnitude Sa (g) Sa (g) 0.01 0.001 0.0001 Figure 41: Comparison of magnitude scaling predicted by the model developed in this study (solid curves) and predicted by Sadigh et al. (1997) (dashed curves) for soft rock. A VS30 of 520 m/s was used to represent the average conditions for Sadigh et al.’s (1997) rock model. C&Y2006 Page 59 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 10 25 Period = 0.2 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 25 Magnitude Period = 3 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 Magnitude
Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 10 25 Period = 0.01 (sec); Vs30 = 310(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 25 Magnitude Period = 1 (sec); Vs30 = 310(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 Magnitude Sa (g) Sa (g) 0.01 0.001 0.0001 Figure 42: Comparison of magnitude scaling predicted by the model developed in this study (solid curves) and predicted by Sadigh et al. (1997) (dashed curves) for soil. A VS30 of 310 m/s was used to represent the average conditions for Sadigh et al.’s (1997) soil model. C&Y2006 Page 60 1 0.1 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1 10 25 Period = 0.2 (sec); Vs30 = 310(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 25 Magnitude Period = 3 (sec); Vs30 = 310(m/s); O14b 50 100 200 3 4 5 6 7 8 Magnitude
- Page 9 and 10: EQID Earthquake M Table 3: Inferred
- Page 11 and 12: Site Average Shear Wave Velocity: A
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 6: Relationship between VS30
- Page 15 and 16: 1 ) ∝ C2 × M + ( C2 − C ) × l
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 9: Peak acceleration data fr
- Page 19 and 20: C4+C5M slowly and the value of the
- Page 21 and 22: allows the interpretation of the co
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 13: Coefficients resulting f
- Page 25 and 26: the top of rupture located at x = 0
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 18: Intra-event residuals fo
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 21: Variation of HW* with ma
- Page 31 and 32: The interpretation of the parameter
- Page 33 and 34: to the PEER-NGA pga data selected f
- Page 35 and 36: EFFECT OF DATA TRUNCATION The initi
- Page 37 and 38: term [ 1 Φ( y ( θ ) + τ ⋅ z ,
- Page 39 and 40: Table 4: Estimate of Anelastic Atte
- Page 41 and 42: data truncated at a maximum distanc
- Page 43 and 44: faulting earthquakes at long period
- Page 45 and 46: Slope -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.
- Page 47 and 48: C&Y2006 Page 46 Table 5: Coefficien
- Page 49 and 50: c1 of T0.010S c1 of T1.000S MODEL R
- Page 51 and 52: esid 1 0 -1 -2 resid resid 1 0 -1 -
- Page 53 and 54: esid resid resid 1 0 -1 -2 1 0 -1 -
- Page 55 and 56: esid 2 1 0 -1 -2 SCEC Version 2 0 2
- Page 57 and 58: Amplification w.r.t. Vs30 = 1130 m/
- Page 59: Sa(g) Sa(g) 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1
- Page 63 and 64: Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.
- Page 65 and 66: EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORTRAN routin
- Page 67 and 68: Table 6: Example Calculations Perio
- Page 69 and 70: REFERENCES Abrahamson, N.A., and Si
- Page 71 and 72: Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell
- Page 73 and 74: Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA
- Page 75 and 76: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
Sa (g)<br />
Sa (g)<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
0.0001<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
0.0001<br />
1<br />
10<br />
25<br />
Period = 0.01 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b<br />
50<br />
100<br />
200<br />
3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
1<br />
10<br />
25<br />
Magnitude<br />
Period = 1 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b<br />
50<br />
100<br />
200<br />
3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Magnitude<br />
Sa (g)<br />
Sa (g)<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
0.0001<br />
Figure 41: Comparison of magnitude scaling predicted by the model developed in this study (solid<br />
curves) <strong>and</strong> predicted by Sadigh et al. (1997) (dashed curves) <strong>for</strong> soft rock. A VS30 of 520 m/s was<br />
used to represent the average conditions <strong>for</strong> Sadigh et al.’s (1997) rock model.<br />
C&Y2006 Page 59<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
0.0001<br />
1<br />
10<br />
25<br />
Period = 0.2 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b<br />
50<br />
100<br />
200<br />
3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
1<br />
10<br />
25<br />
Magnitude<br />
Period = 3 (sec); Vs30 = 520(m/s); O14b<br />
50<br />
100<br />
200<br />
3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Magnitude
Change language