Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Sa(g)<br />
Sa(g)<br />
10<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
10<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
Vs30 = 520; Z1.0 = 0 Km; SS; Z.TOR = 0 Km<br />
M = 3.5, R = 1<br />
M = 4.5, R = 1<br />
M = 5.5, R = 1<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Period (Sec)<br />
M = 6.5, R = 1<br />
M = 7.5, R = 1<br />
M = 8.5, R = 1<br />
Vs30 = 520; Z1.0 = 0 Km; SS; Z.TOR = 0 Km<br />
M = 3.5, R = 30<br />
M = 4.5, R = 30<br />
M = 5.5, R = 30<br />
Period (Sec)<br />
M = 6.5, R = 30<br />
M = 7.5, R = 30<br />
M = 8.5, R = 30<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Sa(g)<br />
Sa(g)<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Period (Sec)<br />
Figure 39: Comparison of median response spectra predicted by the model developed in this study<br />
(solid curves) <strong>and</strong> predicted by Sadigh et al. (1997) (dashed curves) <strong>for</strong> soft rock. A VS30 of 520 m/s<br />
was used to represent the average conditions <strong>for</strong> Sadigh et al.’s (1997) rock model.<br />
C&Y2006 Page 57<br />
10<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
10<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
Vs30 = 520; Z1.0 = 0 Km; SS; Z.TOR = 0 Km<br />
M = 3.5, R = 10<br />
M = 4.5, R = 10<br />
M = 5.5, R = 10<br />
Period (Sec)<br />
M = 6.5, R = 10<br />
M = 7.5, R = 10<br />
M = 8.5, R = 10<br />
Vs30 = 520; Z1.0 = 0 Km; SS; Z.TOR = 0 Km<br />
M = 3.5, R = 70<br />
M = 4.5, R = 70<br />
M = 5.5, R = 70<br />
M = 6.5, R = 70<br />
M = 7.5, R = 70<br />
M = 8.5, R = 70<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10
Change language