Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with increasing rupture depth. The data in the <strong>PEER</strong>-<strong>NGA</strong> data set are insufficient to test if<br />
Equation (13) per<strong>for</strong>ms better than piece-wise linear functions of RRUP, M <strong>and</strong> ZTOR.<br />
SITE EFFECTS<br />
Near-Surface Geology: The incorporation of the effects of near-surface geology or site<br />
classification has gone through an evolution in the past 10 years. At the beginning of this<br />
period, ground motion models typically contained a scaling parameter based on site<br />
classification (e.g. Boore et al., 1993), or presented different models <strong>for</strong> “rock” <strong>and</strong> “soil”<br />
sites (e.g. Campbell, 1993; Sadigh et al. 1997). Classification of recording sites into rock or<br />
soil sites varied among investigators. Boore et al. (1997) introduced the explicit use of the<br />
average shear wave velocity in the upper 30 meters, VS30, in the ground motion model.<br />
Abrahamson <strong>and</strong> Silva (1997) building on an earlier model by <strong>Youngs</strong> (1993) introduced the<br />
explicit modeling of non-linear site effects in the ground motion model. The model we have<br />
developed <strong>for</strong> incorporating near-surface geology combines these concepts.<br />
ln( site<br />
ref Site S 30 ref<br />
y ) = ln( y ) + f ( V , y )<br />
(14)<br />
The parameter yref is the ground motion on the reference site condition derived from the<br />
source <strong>and</strong> path scaling models described in the previous section. The reference site shear<br />
wave velocity was chosen to be 1130 m/sec because of the initial use of site response data to<br />
develop the functional <strong>for</strong>m (Silva, 2004) <strong>and</strong> because it is expected that there will not be<br />
significant nonlinear site response at this velocity. As indicated on Figures 4 <strong>and</strong> 5, there are<br />
very few data with values of VS30 greater than 1100 m/sec. The reference motion is defined<br />
to be the spectral acceleration at the spectral period of interest <strong>for</strong> two reasons. Bazzurro <strong>and</strong><br />
Cornell (2004) indicate that the spectral acceleration at spectral period T is “the single most<br />
helpful parameter” <strong>for</strong> the prediction of site amplification at that period. In addition, the<br />
estimation of the coefficients of the ground motion model is per<strong>for</strong>med using r<strong>and</strong>om<br />
(mixed) effects regression in which the reference motion includes the r<strong>and</strong>om event term<br />
representing the deviation of the average ground motions from a given earthquake from the<br />
global population mean. Use of the reference spectral acceleration at period T to estimate<br />
surface ground motions at the same period eliminates the need to include the correlation in<br />
the r<strong>and</strong>om effects between those at period T <strong>and</strong> those at another period, such as pga at<br />
“zero” period.<br />
The function <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the site response model fSite with yref = SA1130 is given by:<br />
where<br />
f<br />
Site<br />
( V<br />
S 30<br />
, T,<br />
SA<br />
1130<br />
) = a(<br />
V<br />
a(<br />
V<br />
S 30<br />
S 30<br />
, T ) + b(<br />
V<br />
b(<br />
Vs30,<br />
T ) = φ ( T ) exp<br />
2<br />
⎡ VS<br />
30 ⎤<br />
, T ) = φ1<br />
ln⎢1130⎥<br />
⎣ ⎦<br />
c(<br />
T ) = φ ( T )<br />
⎡ SA1130<br />
( T ) + c(<br />
T ) ⎤<br />
, T ) ln⎢<br />
c(<br />
T )<br />
⎥<br />
⎣<br />
⎦<br />
{ φ ( T ) × ( V − 360)<br />
}<br />
C&Y2006 Page 29<br />
4<br />
3<br />
S 30<br />
S 30<br />
(15)