08.04.2013 Views

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

geometric effect, we expect that smaller overall ruptures would produce less effect than<br />

larger rupture, given the same values of RJB <strong>and</strong> RRUP. Previous implementations of the<br />

hanging wall effect in empirical models have reduced the effect to 0 <strong>for</strong> magnitudes less than<br />

M 6. Similarly, as the same size rupture is moved to deeper depths, we would also expect<br />

the hanging wall effect to be reduced. Both smaller rupture sizes <strong>and</strong> greater depths would<br />

tend to move make RRMS closer to RRUP, <strong>and</strong> thus, according to the analysis of <strong>Chiou</strong> et al.<br />

(2000), reduce the hanging wall effect.<br />

We propose a geometric factor, HW* = 2ψ/π, to represent the combined effect of rupture size<br />

<strong>and</strong> rupture depth. The factor is illustrated on Figure 20. The angle ψ represents the halfangle<br />

of the exposure of the surface to the fault plane <strong>and</strong> is a function of the rupture width,<br />

W, <strong>and</strong> the rupture depth, ZTOR. Using the geometry of the fault rupture, HW* is computed<br />

by the relationship:<br />

HW*<br />

2 −1⎛<br />

W cos( δ ) ⎞<br />

= tan ⎜<br />

⎟<br />

τ ⎝ 2(<br />

ZTOR<br />

+ ζ ) ⎠<br />

The factor ζ is included to remove singularities in the calculation <strong>and</strong> to limit the hanging<br />

wall effect <strong>for</strong> small magnitudes at shallow depths. Figure 21 show the variation of HW*<br />

with M <strong>and</strong> ZTOR with ζ set equal to 1 km. The function introduces a decrease in the hanging<br />

wall effect with increasing rupture depth that is magnitude-dependent.<br />

ZTOR<br />

W<br />

ψ<br />

Figure 20: Illustration of the hanging wall geometric factor HW*.<br />

Figure 22 shows that HW* correlates with both magnitude <strong>and</strong> ZTOR <strong>for</strong> the data selected <strong>for</strong><br />

use in this study.<br />

One additional aspect of the hanging wall effect needs to be addressed. The function<br />

[ 1−<br />

RJB<br />

/ RRUP<br />

] produces the same level of hanging wall effect at locations on top of the<br />

rupture. However, the numerical modeling results presented in <strong>Chiou</strong> et al. (2000) <strong>and</strong> those<br />

conducted <strong>for</strong> the <strong>PEER</strong>-<strong>NGA</strong> project (Somerville et al., 2006) show the hanging wall effect<br />

tapering to zero at the fault tip <strong>for</strong> faults with surface rupture. We model this effect by<br />

multiplying the hanging wall term by tanh(0.5RRUP).<br />

C&Y2006 Page 27<br />

δ<br />

(12)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!