Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130 m/s 560 m/s 270 m/s 152 m/s Kocaeli, Turkey Kozani, Greece-01 L<strong>and</strong>ers 0.1 1 10 NEHRP-A NEHRP-B ClstD NEHRP-C NEHRP-D Lazio-Abruzzo, Italy NEHRPE 0.1 1 10
T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130 m/s 560 m/s 270 m/s 152 m/s Little Skull Mtn,NV Livermore-01 Loma Prieta 0.1 1 10 NEHRP-A NEHRP-B ClstD NEHRP-C NEHRP-D Lytle Creek NEHRPE 0.1 1 10
Page 1 and 2:
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical
Page 3 and 4:
data are consistent with strong mot
Page 5 and 6:
Figure 1: Magnitude-distance-region
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 2: Empirical ground motion d
Page 9 and 10:
EQID Earthquake M Table 3: Inferred
Page 11 and 12:
Site Average Shear Wave Velocity: A
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6: Relationship between VS30
Page 15 and 16:
1 ) ∝ C2 × M + ( C2 − C ) × l
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 9: Peak acceleration data fr
Page 19 and 20:
C4+C5M slowly and the value of the
Page 21 and 22:
allows the interpretation of the co
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 13: Coefficients resulting f
Page 25 and 26:
the top of rupture located at x = 0
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 18: Intra-event residuals fo
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 21: Variation of HW* with ma
Page 31 and 32:
The interpretation of the parameter
Page 33 and 34:
to the PEER-NGA pga data selected f
Page 35 and 36:
EFFECT OF DATA TRUNCATION The initi
Page 37 and 38:
term [ 1 Φ( y ( θ ) + τ ⋅ z ,
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4: Estimate of Anelastic Atte
Page 41 and 42:
data truncated at a maximum distanc
Page 43 and 44:
faulting earthquakes at long period
Page 45 and 46:
Slope -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.
Page 47 and 48:
C&Y2006 Page 46 Table 5: Coefficien
Page 49 and 50:
c1 of T0.010S c1 of T1.000S MODEL R
Page 51 and 52:
esid 1 0 -1 -2 resid resid 1 0 -1 -
Page 53 and 54:
esid resid resid 1 0 -1 -2 1 0 -1 -
Page 55 and 56:
esid 2 1 0 -1 -2 SCEC Version 2 0 2
Page 57 and 58:
Amplification w.r.t. Vs30 = 1130 m/
Page 59 and 60:
Sa(g) Sa(g) 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1
Page 61 and 62:
Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.00
Page 63 and 64:
Sa (g) Sa (g) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.
Page 65 and 66:
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORTRAN routin
Page 67 and 68:
Table 6: Example Calculations Perio
Page 69 and 70:
REFERENCES Abrahamson, N.A., and Si
Page 71 and 72:
Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA
Page 75 and 76:
RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
Page 123 and 124:
Figure B-2: Data for aspect ratio v
Page 125 and 126: Probability . 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0
Page 127 and 128: Appendix C Estimation of Vs30 at CW
Page 129 and 130: Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 G
Page 131 and 132: Vs30 (m/sec) 1400 1200 1000 800 600
Page 133 and 134: Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution
Page 135 and 136: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 137 and 138: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 139 and 140: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 141 and 142: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 143 and 144: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 145 and 146: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
Page 147 and 148: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 149 and 150: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 151 and 152: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 153 and 154: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 155 and 156: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 157 and 158: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 159 and 160: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 161 and 162: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 163 and 164: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 165 and 166: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 167 and 168: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 169 and 170: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 171 and 172: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 173 and 174: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 175: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 179 and 180: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 181 and 182: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 183 and 184: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 185 and 186: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Page 187 and 188: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 189 and 190: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 191 and 192: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 193 and 194: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 195 and 196: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 197 and 198: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 199 and 200: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 201 and 202: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 203 and 204: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 0.1 0.01
Page 205 and 206: T1.000S 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1130 m/s 5
Page 207 and 208: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 209 and 210: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 211 and 212: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 213 and 214: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 215 and 216: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 217 and 218: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
Page 219: T3.000S 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.0
show all

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?