Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

peer.berkeley.edu
from peer.berkeley.edu More from this publisher
08.04.2013 Views

Appendix D Processing and Model Fits to TriNet/ShakeMap Data (Incomplete) Dataset Ground-motion dataset used in this analysis was compiled by USGS (Boatwright, per. communication) from the TriNet. It includes PGA (in units of %g) and PGV (in units of cm/sec) from 252 earthquakes (Figure D-1). Since only the larger of the tow horizontal components is provided, we divide the listed PGA value by 1.13 to adjust the value down to the expected level of average horizontal component. A subset of 102 events are selected and used in the analysis; see below for description of selection criteria. Epicenter location, focal depth, and local magnitude ML of each earthquake are from the SCSN catalog. Moment magnitude (Mw) is based on the moment tensor solution catalog, also from SCSN. Since most earthquakes are small in size and therefore without a finite source model, rupture distance is imputed using the same procedure as documented in Appedix ?. For site conditions, we used the Vs30 value in the NGA database or estimated it using the same correlation between Vs30 and geological unit as was used in NGA. The geological unit at the station coordinate is provided by Chris Wills using the recently refined CGS site-conditions map (Wills et al., 2005). For stations without geological unit and NGA Vs30, we used the site category given in the USGS data file (column ‘C’) to estimate Vs30 using Table ? in Wills et al. (2001?): C=1, Vs30 = 674 (m/sec) C=2, Vs30 = 423 (m/sec) C=3, Vs30 = 281 (m/sec) C=4, Vs30 = 165 (m/sec). Selection of Data Subset When earthquake epicenter is outside or near the boundary of the strong-motion station network the majority of the recording stations often lie in a limited distance range. Such earthquakes are removed because they are not very useful to the characterization of distance attenuation. The removed earthquakes are plotted as blue circles in Figure 1. Furthermore, the quality of PGA data degrades as distance increases. Because of the large number of records a full quality control is not feasible. Instead, we removed PGA from beyond the cutoff distance of 130 * (M-2) (km), slightly more generous than the cutoff distance of 100 * (M-2) (km) recommended by Boatwright et al. (2003) for northern California earthquakes. We also removed data that are obviously in errors. The final subset includes 102 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude from 3.39 to 5.17, and 9060 PGA data, with values ranging from 0.0007 to 24.5 (%g).

Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution of the TriNet data. Following this figure are plots of the pga values for the individual earthquakes. The dashed line on each figure is the global model developed in this study and the solid line is the event-specific fit.

Appendix D<br />

Processing <strong>and</strong> <strong>Model</strong> Fits to TriNet/ShakeMap Data<br />

(Incomplete)<br />

Dataset<br />

<strong>Ground</strong>-motion dataset used in this analysis was compiled by USGS (Boatwright,<br />

per. communication) from the TriNet. It includes PGA (in units of %g) <strong>and</strong> PGV (in units<br />

of cm/sec) from 252 earthquakes (Figure D-1). Since only the larger of the tow horizontal<br />

components is provided, we divide the listed PGA value by 1.13 to adjust the value down<br />

to the expected level of average horizontal component. A subset of 102 events are<br />

selected <strong>and</strong> used in the analysis; see below <strong>for</strong> description of selection criteria.<br />

Epicenter location, focal depth, <strong>and</strong> local magnitude ML of each earthquake are from the<br />

SCSN catalog. Moment magnitude (Mw) is based on the moment tensor solution catalog,<br />

also from SCSN.<br />

Since most earthquakes are small in size <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e without a finite source<br />

model, rupture distance is imputed using the same procedure as documented in Appedix ?.<br />

For site conditions, we used the Vs30 value in the <strong>NGA</strong> database or estimated it using the<br />

same correlation between Vs30 <strong>and</strong> geological unit as was used in <strong>NGA</strong>. The geological<br />

unit at the station coordinate is provided by Chris Wills using the recently refined CGS<br />

site-conditions map (Wills et al., 2005). For stations without geological unit <strong>and</strong> <strong>NGA</strong><br />

Vs30, we used the site category given in the USGS data file (column ‘C’) to estimate Vs30<br />

using Table ? in Wills et al. (2001?):<br />

C=1, Vs30 = 674 (m/sec)<br />

C=2, Vs30 = 423 (m/sec)<br />

C=3, Vs30 = 281 (m/sec)<br />

C=4, Vs30 = 165 (m/sec).<br />

Selection of Data Subset<br />

When earthquake epicenter is outside or near the boundary of the strong-motion<br />

station network the majority of the recording stations often lie in a limited distance range.<br />

Such earthquakes are removed because they are not very useful to the characterization of<br />

distance attenuation. The removed earthquakes are plotted as blue circles in Figure 1.<br />

Furthermore, the quality of PGA data degrades as distance increases. Because of<br />

the large number of records a full quality control is not feasible. Instead, we removed<br />

PGA from beyond the cutoff distance of 130 * (M-2) (km), slightly more generous than<br />

the cutoff distance of 100 * (M-2) (km) recommended by Boatwright et al. (2003) <strong>for</strong><br />

northern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia earthquakes. We also removed data that are obviously in errors. The<br />

final subset includes 102 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude from 3.39 to 5.17, <strong>and</strong> 9060<br />

PGA data, with values ranging from 0.0007 to 24.5 (%g).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!