Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Appendix D Processing and Model Fits to TriNet/ShakeMap Data (Incomplete) Dataset Ground-motion dataset used in this analysis was compiled by USGS (Boatwright, per. communication) from the TriNet. It includes PGA (in units of %g) and PGV (in units of cm/sec) from 252 earthquakes (Figure D-1). Since only the larger of the tow horizontal components is provided, we divide the listed PGA value by 1.13 to adjust the value down to the expected level of average horizontal component. A subset of 102 events are selected and used in the analysis; see below for description of selection criteria. Epicenter location, focal depth, and local magnitude ML of each earthquake are from the SCSN catalog. Moment magnitude (Mw) is based on the moment tensor solution catalog, also from SCSN. Since most earthquakes are small in size and therefore without a finite source model, rupture distance is imputed using the same procedure as documented in Appedix ?. For site conditions, we used the Vs30 value in the NGA database or estimated it using the same correlation between Vs30 and geological unit as was used in NGA. The geological unit at the station coordinate is provided by Chris Wills using the recently refined CGS site-conditions map (Wills et al., 2005). For stations without geological unit and NGA Vs30, we used the site category given in the USGS data file (column ‘C’) to estimate Vs30 using Table ? in Wills et al. (2001?): C=1, Vs30 = 674 (m/sec) C=2, Vs30 = 423 (m/sec) C=3, Vs30 = 281 (m/sec) C=4, Vs30 = 165 (m/sec). Selection of Data Subset When earthquake epicenter is outside or near the boundary of the strong-motion station network the majority of the recording stations often lie in a limited distance range. Such earthquakes are removed because they are not very useful to the characterization of distance attenuation. The removed earthquakes are plotted as blue circles in Figure 1. Furthermore, the quality of PGA data degrades as distance increases. Because of the large number of records a full quality control is not feasible. Instead, we removed PGA from beyond the cutoff distance of 130 * (M-2) (km), slightly more generous than the cutoff distance of 100 * (M-2) (km) recommended by Boatwright et al. (2003) for northern California earthquakes. We also removed data that are obviously in errors. The final subset includes 102 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude from 3.39 to 5.17, and 9060 PGA data, with values ranging from 0.0007 to 24.5 (%g).
Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution of the TriNet data. Following this figure are plots of the pga values for the individual earthquakes. The dashed line on each figure is the global model developed in this study and the solid line is the event-specific fit.
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
- Page 123 and 124: Figure B-2: Data for aspect ratio v
- Page 125 and 126: Probability . 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix C Estimation of Vs30 at CW
- Page 129 and 130: Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 G
- Page 131: Vs30 (m/sec) 1400 1200 1000 800 600
- Page 135 and 136: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 137 and 138: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 139 and 140: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 141 and 142: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 143 and 144: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 145 and 146: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 147 and 148: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 149 and 150: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 151 and 152: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 153 and 154: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 155 and 156: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 157 and 158: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 159 and 160: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 161 and 162: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 163 and 164: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 165 and 166: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 167 and 168: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 169 and 170: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 171 and 172: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 173 and 174: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 175 and 176: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 177 and 178: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 179 and 180: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 181 and 182: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Appendix D<br />
Processing <strong>and</strong> <strong>Model</strong> Fits to TriNet/ShakeMap Data<br />
(Incomplete)<br />
Dataset<br />
<strong>Ground</strong>-motion dataset used in this analysis was compiled by USGS (Boatwright,<br />
per. communication) from the TriNet. It includes PGA (in units of %g) <strong>and</strong> PGV (in units<br />
of cm/sec) from 252 earthquakes (Figure D-1). Since only the larger of the tow horizontal<br />
components is provided, we divide the listed PGA value by 1.13 to adjust the value down<br />
to the expected level of average horizontal component. A subset of 102 events are<br />
selected <strong>and</strong> used in the analysis; see below <strong>for</strong> description of selection criteria.<br />
Epicenter location, focal depth, <strong>and</strong> local magnitude ML of each earthquake are from the<br />
SCSN catalog. Moment magnitude (Mw) is based on the moment tensor solution catalog,<br />
also from SCSN.<br />
Since most earthquakes are small in size <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e without a finite source<br />
model, rupture distance is imputed using the same procedure as documented in Appedix ?.<br />
For site conditions, we used the Vs30 value in the <strong>NGA</strong> database or estimated it using the<br />
same correlation between Vs30 <strong>and</strong> geological unit as was used in <strong>NGA</strong>. The geological<br />
unit at the station coordinate is provided by Chris Wills using the recently refined CGS<br />
site-conditions map (Wills et al., 2005). For stations without geological unit <strong>and</strong> <strong>NGA</strong><br />
Vs30, we used the site category given in the USGS data file (column ‘C’) to estimate Vs30<br />
using Table ? in Wills et al. (2001?):<br />
C=1, Vs30 = 674 (m/sec)<br />
C=2, Vs30 = 423 (m/sec)<br />
C=3, Vs30 = 281 (m/sec)<br />
C=4, Vs30 = 165 (m/sec).<br />
Selection of Data Subset<br />
When earthquake epicenter is outside or near the boundary of the strong-motion<br />
station network the majority of the recording stations often lie in a limited distance range.<br />
Such earthquakes are removed because they are not very useful to the characterization of<br />
distance attenuation. The removed earthquakes are plotted as blue circles in Figure 1.<br />
Furthermore, the quality of PGA data degrades as distance increases. Because of<br />
the large number of records a full quality control is not feasible. Instead, we removed<br />
PGA from beyond the cutoff distance of 130 * (M-2) (km), slightly more generous than<br />
the cutoff distance of 100 * (M-2) (km) recommended by Boatwright et al. (2003) <strong>for</strong><br />
northern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia earthquakes. We also removed data that are obviously in errors. The<br />
final subset includes 102 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude from 3.39 to 5.17, <strong>and</strong> 9060<br />
PGA data, with values ranging from 0.0007 to 24.5 (%g).