Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
data are plotted as a function of station elevation in Figure C-2. Except for a few outliers, the correlation of Vs30 with elevation is clearly shown, particularly within Geomatrix-D category. The bimodal distribution observed in Figures 1 can be adequately modeled by the station elevation. Mapping Vs30 by C3 and Elevation Based on the trend noted in Figure C-2, the following functional form is selected to model Vs30 as a function of station elevation (Elv, in meters), ln( Vs 30 ) = ln( φ1 ) + 1+ e ln( φ2 ) − ln( φ1 ) . (ln( φ ) − ln( Elv )) / φ 3 Interpretations of the unknown coefficients are as followed: φ 1 and φ 2 are the asymptotic Vs30 as the elevation approaches 0 and ∞, respectively; at the elevation of φ3 meters, Vs30 is the (geometric) average of the two asymptotes. The above model was used to fit Vs30 data in each of the five Geomatrix categories. The estimated coefficients (φi, i=1, 4) are listed in Table C-1 and the fitted curves are shown on the left hand plot in Figure C-3. To show the difference between this mapping scheme and that used in California, Vs30 estimates of the non-measurement sites are plotted in the right panel of Figure C-3. The solid lines are Vs30 mapped by the new model; circles are Vs30 mapped by California’s model (Silva, 2004; see Note #34 in the site file NGA_Site_V017.XLS). In most cases the difference is not large. The larger difference occurs in Geomatrix-D category at elevation higher than 70m, as expected. REFERENCES: 4 Lee, C.T., Cheng, C.T., Liao, C.W., and Tsai, T.B., 2001, Site classfication of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 91, no. 5, p 1283-1297. Wills, C.J., Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Reichle, M.S., Saucedo, G.J., Tan, S.S, Taylor, G.C, and Treiman J.A., 2000, A site conditions map for California based on geology and shear wave velocity: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, no. 6b, p S187-S208. Wills, C.J. and Silva, W., 1998, Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units in California: Earthquake Spectra, v. 14, p. 533-556. Wills C.J. and Clahan K., 2005, NGA site condition metadata from geology, report to PEER-LL, 2005. C&Y2006, Appendix C C-2
Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 Geomatrix 3 rd Letter Table C-1. Estimated Coefficients. φ 1 φ 2 φ 3 φ 4 σ A 552 680 1 Number of Data Points 244 0.1154 0.3174 15 B 418 579 107.1 0.3850 0.2294 35 C - - - - - 4 2 D 228 509 39.4 0.373 0.2953 91 E 201 405 38.2 0.087 0.1810 18 Total = 163 3 1: This parameter is fixed by judgment. 2: There is insufficient number of data to derive a relationship. To estimate Vs30 of category C site, one could use the relationship for category D. 3: Two data points in Geomtrix-B category were removed. A 500 1000 1500 Geomatrix C3 D E 500 1000 1500 Figure C-1. Histogram of measured Vs30 grouped by Geomatrix’s 3 C&Y2006, Appendix C C-3 rd letter C3. The thick blue line is the Vs30 distribution model of California data (Silva, 2004) B Vs30 C 50 40 30 20 10 0
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
- Page 123 and 124: Figure B-2: Data for aspect ratio v
- Page 125 and 126: Probability . 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0
- Page 127: Appendix C Estimation of Vs30 at CW
- Page 131 and 132: Vs30 (m/sec) 1400 1200 1000 800 600
- Page 133 and 134: Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution
- Page 135 and 136: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 137 and 138: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 139 and 140: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 141 and 142: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 143 and 144: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 145 and 146: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 147 and 148: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 149 and 150: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 151 and 152: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 153 and 154: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 155 and 156: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 157 and 158: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 159 and 160: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 161 and 162: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 163 and 164: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 165 and 166: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 167 and 168: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 169 and 170: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 171 and 172: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 173 and 174: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 175 and 176: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 177 and 178: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
data are plotted as a function of station elevation in Figure C-2. Except <strong>for</strong> a few outliers,<br />
the correlation of Vs30 with elevation is clearly shown, particularly within Geomatrix-D<br />
category. The bimodal distribution observed in Figures 1 can be adequately modeled by<br />
the station elevation.<br />
Mapping Vs30 by C3 <strong>and</strong> Elevation<br />
Based on the trend noted in Figure C-2, the following functional <strong>for</strong>m is selected to<br />
model Vs30 as a function of station elevation (Elv, in meters),<br />
ln( Vs<br />
30<br />
) = ln( φ1<br />
) +<br />
1+<br />
e<br />
ln( φ2<br />
) − ln( φ1<br />
)<br />
.<br />
(ln( φ ) − ln( Elv )) / φ<br />
3<br />
Interpretations of the unknown coefficients are as followed: φ 1 <strong>and</strong> φ 2 are the asymptotic<br />
Vs30 as the elevation approaches 0 <strong>and</strong> ∞, respectively; at the elevation of φ3 meters, Vs30<br />
is the (geometric) average of the two asymptotes.<br />
The above model was used to fit Vs30 data in each of the five Geomatrix categories. The<br />
estimated coefficients (φi, i=1, 4) are listed in Table C-1 <strong>and</strong> the fitted curves are shown<br />
on the left h<strong>and</strong> plot in Figure C-3.<br />
To show the difference between this mapping scheme <strong>and</strong> that used in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Vs30<br />
estimates of the non-measurement sites are plotted in the right panel of Figure C-3. The<br />
solid lines are Vs30 mapped by the new model; circles are Vs30 mapped by Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s<br />
model (Silva, 2004; see Note #34 in the site file <strong>NGA</strong>_Site_V017.XLS). In most cases<br />
the difference is not large. The larger difference occurs in Geomatrix-D category at<br />
elevation higher than 70m, as expected.<br />
REFERENCES:<br />
4<br />
Lee, C.T., Cheng, C.T., Liao, C.W., <strong>and</strong> Tsai, T.B., 2001, Site classfication of Taiwan<br />
free-field strong-motion stations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of<br />
America, v. 91, no. 5, p 1283-1297.<br />
Wills, C.J., Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Reichle, M.S., Saucedo, G.J., Tan, S.S,<br />
Taylor, G.C, <strong>and</strong> Treiman J.A., 2000, A site conditions map <strong>for</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />
based on geology <strong>and</strong> shear wave velocity: Bulletin of the Seismological<br />
Society of America, v. 90, no. 6b, p S187-S208.<br />
Wills, C.J. <strong>and</strong> Silva, W., 1998, Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units<br />
in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia: Earthquake Spectra, v. 14, p. 533-556.<br />
Wills C.J. <strong>and</strong> Clahan K., 2005, <strong>NGA</strong> site condition metadata from geology, report to<br />
<strong>PEER</strong>-LL, 2005.<br />
C&Y2006, Appendix C C-2