Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...

peer.berkeley.edu
from peer.berkeley.edu More from this publisher
08.04.2013 Views

data are plotted as a function of station elevation in Figure C-2. Except for a few outliers, the correlation of Vs30 with elevation is clearly shown, particularly within Geomatrix-D category. The bimodal distribution observed in Figures 1 can be adequately modeled by the station elevation. Mapping Vs30 by C3 and Elevation Based on the trend noted in Figure C-2, the following functional form is selected to model Vs30 as a function of station elevation (Elv, in meters), ln( Vs 30 ) = ln( φ1 ) + 1+ e ln( φ2 ) − ln( φ1 ) . (ln( φ ) − ln( Elv )) / φ 3 Interpretations of the unknown coefficients are as followed: φ 1 and φ 2 are the asymptotic Vs30 as the elevation approaches 0 and ∞, respectively; at the elevation of φ3 meters, Vs30 is the (geometric) average of the two asymptotes. The above model was used to fit Vs30 data in each of the five Geomatrix categories. The estimated coefficients (φi, i=1, 4) are listed in Table C-1 and the fitted curves are shown on the left hand plot in Figure C-3. To show the difference between this mapping scheme and that used in California, Vs30 estimates of the non-measurement sites are plotted in the right panel of Figure C-3. The solid lines are Vs30 mapped by the new model; circles are Vs30 mapped by California’s model (Silva, 2004; see Note #34 in the site file NGA_Site_V017.XLS). In most cases the difference is not large. The larger difference occurs in Geomatrix-D category at elevation higher than 70m, as expected. REFERENCES: 4 Lee, C.T., Cheng, C.T., Liao, C.W., and Tsai, T.B., 2001, Site classfication of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 91, no. 5, p 1283-1297. Wills, C.J., Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Reichle, M.S., Saucedo, G.J., Tan, S.S, Taylor, G.C, and Treiman J.A., 2000, A site conditions map for California based on geology and shear wave velocity: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, no. 6b, p S187-S208. Wills, C.J. and Silva, W., 1998, Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units in California: Earthquake Spectra, v. 14, p. 533-556. Wills C.J. and Clahan K., 2005, NGA site condition metadata from geology, report to PEER-LL, 2005. C&Y2006, Appendix C C-2

Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 Geomatrix 3 rd Letter Table C-1. Estimated Coefficients. φ 1 φ 2 φ 3 φ 4 σ A 552 680 1 Number of Data Points 244 0.1154 0.3174 15 B 418 579 107.1 0.3850 0.2294 35 C - - - - - 4 2 D 228 509 39.4 0.373 0.2953 91 E 201 405 38.2 0.087 0.1810 18 Total = 163 3 1: This parameter is fixed by judgment. 2: There is insufficient number of data to derive a relationship. To estimate Vs30 of category C site, one could use the relationship for category D. 3: Two data points in Geomtrix-B category were removed. A 500 1000 1500 Geomatrix C3 D E 500 1000 1500 Figure C-1. Histogram of measured Vs30 grouped by Geomatrix’s 3 C&Y2006, Appendix C C-3 rd letter C3. The thick blue line is the Vs30 distribution model of California data (Silva, 2004) B Vs30 C 50 40 30 20 10 0

data are plotted as a function of station elevation in Figure C-2. Except <strong>for</strong> a few outliers,<br />

the correlation of Vs30 with elevation is clearly shown, particularly within Geomatrix-D<br />

category. The bimodal distribution observed in Figures 1 can be adequately modeled by<br />

the station elevation.<br />

Mapping Vs30 by C3 <strong>and</strong> Elevation<br />

Based on the trend noted in Figure C-2, the following functional <strong>for</strong>m is selected to<br />

model Vs30 as a function of station elevation (Elv, in meters),<br />

ln( Vs<br />

30<br />

) = ln( φ1<br />

) +<br />

1+<br />

e<br />

ln( φ2<br />

) − ln( φ1<br />

)<br />

.<br />

(ln( φ ) − ln( Elv )) / φ<br />

3<br />

Interpretations of the unknown coefficients are as followed: φ 1 <strong>and</strong> φ 2 are the asymptotic<br />

Vs30 as the elevation approaches 0 <strong>and</strong> ∞, respectively; at the elevation of φ3 meters, Vs30<br />

is the (geometric) average of the two asymptotes.<br />

The above model was used to fit Vs30 data in each of the five Geomatrix categories. The<br />

estimated coefficients (φi, i=1, 4) are listed in Table C-1 <strong>and</strong> the fitted curves are shown<br />

on the left h<strong>and</strong> plot in Figure C-3.<br />

To show the difference between this mapping scheme <strong>and</strong> that used in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Vs30<br />

estimates of the non-measurement sites are plotted in the right panel of Figure C-3. The<br />

solid lines are Vs30 mapped by the new model; circles are Vs30 mapped by Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s<br />

model (Silva, 2004; see Note #34 in the site file <strong>NGA</strong>_Site_V017.XLS). In most cases<br />

the difference is not large. The larger difference occurs in Geomatrix-D category at<br />

elevation higher than 70m, as expected.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

4<br />

Lee, C.T., Cheng, C.T., Liao, C.W., <strong>and</strong> Tsai, T.B., 2001, Site classfication of Taiwan<br />

free-field strong-motion stations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of<br />

America, v. 91, no. 5, p 1283-1297.<br />

Wills, C.J., Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Reichle, M.S., Saucedo, G.J., Tan, S.S,<br />

Taylor, G.C, <strong>and</strong> Treiman J.A., 2000, A site conditions map <strong>for</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

based on geology <strong>and</strong> shear wave velocity: Bulletin of the Seismological<br />

Society of America, v. 90, no. 6b, p S187-S208.<br />

Wills, C.J. <strong>and</strong> Silva, W., 1998, Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units<br />

in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia: Earthquake Spectra, v. 14, p. 533-556.<br />

Wills C.J. <strong>and</strong> Clahan K., 2005, <strong>NGA</strong> site condition metadata from geology, report to<br />

<strong>PEER</strong>-LL, 2005.<br />

C&Y2006, Appendix C C-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!