Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ... Chiou and Youngs PEER-NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for ...
Figure B-1: Data for rupture area versus M from PEER-NGA finite fault model set. Symbol color denotes faulting style (black SS, red NM, and green RV). Black lines show fit and 90% confidence interval for fit to data. Blue dash-dot line shows Wells and Coppersmith (1994) relationship for all slip types. C&Y2006, Appendix B B-2
Figure B-2: Data for aspect ratio versus M from PEER-NGA finite fault model set. Symbol color denotes faulting style (black SS, red NM, and green RV). The next step was to locate the rupture plane in space. The vertical location of the simulated rupture with respect to the hypocenter was simulated using empirical distributions for hypocenter location derived from the PEER-NGA set of rupture models. The observed and smoothed empirical distributions are shown in Figure B-3. If the top of the simulated rupture plane extended above 0 depth, it was placed at 0 depth. The rupture plane dip was fixed at the value assigned to the earthquake. The location of the hypocenter along strike was simulated using data from Mai et al. (2005) for earthquakes ≤ M 6.5. This distribution is shown in Figure B-4. C&Y2006, Appendix B B-3
- Page 71 and 72: Frankel, A., A. McGarr, J. Bicknell
- Page 73 and 74: Appendix A Recordings from PEER-NGA
- Page 75 and 76: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 77 and 78: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 79 and 80: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 81 and 82: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 83 and 84: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 85 and 86: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 87 and 88: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 89 and 90: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 91 and 92: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 93 and 94: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 95 and 96: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 97 and 98: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 99 and 100: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 101 and 102: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 103 and 104: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 105 and 106: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 107 and 108: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 109 and 110: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 111 and 112: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 113 and 114: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 115 and 116: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 117 and 118: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 119 and 120: RSN EQID Earthquake M Station No, S
- Page 121: Appendix B Estimation of Distance a
- Page 125 and 126: Probability . 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix C Estimation of Vs30 at CW
- Page 129 and 130: Percent of Total 50 40 30 20 10 0 G
- Page 131 and 132: Vs30 (m/sec) 1400 1200 1000 800 600
- Page 133 and 134: Figure D-1. Epicenter distribution
- Page 135 and 136: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 137 and 138: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 139 and 140: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 141 and 142: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 143 and 144: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 145 and 146: PSA (g) 10^-1 10^-2 10^-3 10^-4 10^
- Page 147 and 148: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 149 and 150: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 151 and 152: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 153 and 154: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 155 and 156: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 157 and 158: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 159 and 160: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 161 and 162: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 163 and 164: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 165 and 166: T0.010S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 167 and 168: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 169 and 170: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
- Page 171 and 172: T0.200S 1 0.1 0.01 1 0.1 0.01 1130
Figure B-1: Data <strong>for</strong> rupture area versus M from <strong>PEER</strong>-<strong>NGA</strong> finite fault model set.<br />
Symbol color denotes faulting style (black SS, red NM, <strong>and</strong> green RV). Black lines show<br />
fit <strong>and</strong> 90% confidence interval <strong>for</strong> fit to data. Blue dash-dot line shows Wells <strong>and</strong><br />
Coppersmith (1994) relationship <strong>for</strong> all slip types.<br />
C&Y2006, Appendix B B-2
Change language