The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...
The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...
The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
social activities. <strong>The</strong> year was divided in eight or more phases or months named according to food supplied<br />
such as “salmon-berry days.” [p. 70] Spring: many varieties <strong>of</strong> roots were collected in the prairies,<br />
principally by Quileute and Quinault. Roots were boiled, dried and stored for the winter. Cedar bark<br />
was peeled <strong>of</strong>f for baskets, mats, raiment, etc. On such expeditions Indians lived in temporary shelters <strong>of</strong><br />
hemlock bark or mats. Bark for such abodes was cut on the spot, but sometimes the Indians carried mats<br />
woven <strong>of</strong> cedarbark. [p. 71] Summer: Some people traded or bartered. Mountain and valley elk were fat<br />
in July and August and Indians hunted them in the mountains. Hunters built brush shelters at convenient<br />
places for a few nights only. Often they carried along skins for shelter ro<strong>of</strong>s if they had many left<br />
from previously hunted elk or deer.<br />
Late in summer (August) storage activities started again. Women went out for berries and sometimes<br />
stayed away for several days. <strong>The</strong> berries were put into large baskets and some <strong>of</strong> these containers were<br />
sunk in the cold spring bed, which kept the berries fresh for a long time. <strong>The</strong> Indians ate such preserved<br />
berries when there were no fresh berries in winter. [p. 71] Fall. At the end <strong>of</strong> summer, the Indians were<br />
anxiously looking forward to fall fish….<strong>The</strong> Indians were as interested in a variety as in an abundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> food. For instance when they were producing fish substantially but estimated that they had more<br />
than enough for consumption, they went berry picking although it might not be equally productive. As<br />
one Quileute informant told me, “<strong>The</strong> Indians did not want all fish or all whale, but liked to get some <strong>of</strong><br />
everything which they wanted to eat. An Indian did not care if he could catch more fish than he could<br />
dig camas.” Choice in production gave the Indians a freedom unknown to most hunting tribes the world<br />
over. [p. 74] An equilibrium had been established between production and social requirements. Indians<br />
had never heard <strong>of</strong> “full production.” <strong>The</strong>y did not need it. <strong>The</strong>y wanted enough to eat, <strong>of</strong> course, but<br />
they never thought in terms <strong>of</strong> maximum utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources. Competition played a part in<br />
production. Boasting about ability was a cultural feature. Quantity and efficiency <strong>of</strong> production were<br />
both well regarded.<br />
[p. 76] Exchange. Exchange is simply customs and institutions which transfer ownership <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />
services from one individual to another. Potlatches…baskets <strong>of</strong> camas were a common gift at potlatches.<br />
Trade…intertribal exchange <strong>of</strong> surpluses. Quileute exchanged (material form the prairies: camas and<br />
other roots, elk meat and fat, elk and deer hides, cedarbark and articles there<strong>of</strong>, and bear grass.<br />
[p. 89] Consumption. Consumption in its broadest sense means the destruction <strong>of</strong> commodities through<br />
various activities including eating, using and trading away goods as needs are satisfied…taboos…rituals…secret<br />
societies and initiations, feasts, potlatches…<br />
[p. 110] Property. <strong>The</strong> study <strong>of</strong> the mode <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> things, land or customary property relationships<br />
and wealth. <strong>The</strong> winter household as the most clearly distinguishable large unit. <strong>The</strong> winter house was<br />
150