08.04.2013 Views

The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...

The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...

The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park - Natural Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE TRADITIONAL CULTURE OF QUILEUTE PRAIRIE USE<br />

Traditional Ownership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Prairies</strong> <strong>of</strong> Quileute Country: Use Rights and Stewardship Obligations<br />

In this section, we will consider native prairie use in terms <strong>of</strong> the traditional Quileute concept <strong>of</strong><br />

tribal territory and individual land ownership, which are the basis for their sense <strong>of</strong> land-use rights and<br />

stewardship obligation. First, let’s detail the basis for the Quileute’s sense that their traditional territory<br />

belonged to them, a premise about which they had no doubts. This assumption derives from their worldview<br />

as depicted in their oral tradition. According to the Quileute cosmogony, the world always existed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, during the Time <strong>of</strong> Beginnings a shape-changing transformer called Q’wati went about the region<br />

changing living things and features <strong>of</strong> the natural world into what we see in the world today. At the Time<br />

<strong>of</strong> Beginnings, animals and people were simply beings who had or were given by Qwati the features <strong>of</strong><br />

the animals that they became. <strong>The</strong>re are narratives, still told among the tribe, that account for many <strong>of</strong><br />

the focal features <strong>of</strong> Quileute country. For example, Q’wati created the rivers <strong>of</strong> Quileute country while<br />

escaping from a pack <strong>of</strong> wolves. <strong>The</strong>n, later, at the mouth <strong>of</strong> the Quileute River, Q’wati transformed those<br />

same wolves into the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the Quileute; and, finding the p’ip’isodat’siLi (“upside-down people”)<br />

living at the mouth <strong>of</strong> the Hoh River, he created the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the Hoh people as we know them by<br />

showing them how to walk on their feet instead <strong>of</strong> their hands. Thus, the oral literature that is Quileute<br />

tribal history confirms that they were created to inhabit, use, collectively own, and pass on to their descendants<br />

the area that includes the drainages <strong>of</strong> the various rivers that combine to make the Quillayute<br />

River. As Jack Ward said in a potlatch speech in 1928 (QT, p.12).<br />

…yix tas t’siq’ati yix hicha’wataxw hilokiL xi’ chiLqwat’oqw hixat<br />

xwa’ tchi:qa’axw xwa’ tchiLqwat’oqw.<br />

…the land, as it belongs to our children as well as to our children’s children.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is some tension between many published assumptions about native land “ownership” and the traditional<br />

Quileute concept. In order to make the Quileute customary perspective on land ownership clear,<br />

we will discuss it in terms <strong>of</strong>:<br />

(a) the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Olympia’s term “open and unclaimed” land;<br />

(b) Quileute Use-ownership -vs- American legal real property ownership;<br />

(c) Quileute Use-ownership based on building or a continuing improvement on the land;<br />

(d) Quileute concepts <strong>of</strong> Alienable and Inalienable property;<br />

(e) Permissive utilization <strong>of</strong> a property’s resources -vs- users in common<br />

Were the Quileute <strong>Prairies</strong> “Open and Unclaimed land?” <strong>The</strong> terms “open” and “unclaimed” were<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!