Effects of high pH on a natural marine planktonic community
Effects of high pH on a natural marine planktonic community Effects of high pH on a natural marine planktonic community
20 calm sunny periods,
Pedersen & Hansen:
- Page 1: MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol.
- Page 5 and 6: Pedersen & Hansen: Effects<
- Page 7 and 8: Pedersen & Hansen: Effects<
- Page 9 and 10: Pedersen & Hansen: Effects<
- Page 11 and 12: Pedersen & Hansen: Effects<
- Page 13: Pedersen & Hansen: Effects<
Pedersen & Hansen: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>high</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> a plankt<strong>on</strong>ic <strong>community</strong><br />
The dimensi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 cells <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each taxa were measured<br />
and cell volumes were estimated from linear<br />
dimensi<strong>on</strong>s using simple volumetric formulae. Cellular<br />
carb<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tent was then calculated using the following<br />
equati<strong>on</strong>s (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000) where V is<br />
the cell volume:<br />
Din<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>lagellates: pgC cell –1 = 0.760 × V 0.819<br />
Diatoms >3000 µm 3 : pgC cell –1 = 0.288 × V 0.811<br />
Other protists: pgC cell –1 = 0.216 × V 0.939<br />
Although the water was pre-screened through a<br />
plankt<strong>on</strong> net (mesh size 160 µm), some developmental<br />
stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small copepods passed the filter. To evaluate<br />
their grazing impact <strong>on</strong> the protist <strong>community</strong>, the<br />
copepods were identified to species and developmental<br />
stage to estimate the clearance rate <strong>on</strong> potential<br />
prey examined in this paper. Enumerati<strong>on</strong> and identificati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> copepods in some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Lugol-fixed samples<br />
was c<strong>on</strong>ducted using a dissecti<strong>on</strong> microscope. The<br />
prosome length <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each species was used for identificati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the developmental stages. The maximum clearance<br />
was estimated for copepods using the equati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
given in Hansen et al. 1997 and taking size into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
RESULTS<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> and inorganic nutrients<br />
The <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>natural</strong> seawater samples was adjusted to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8, 8.5, 9 and 9.5 respectively, and kept stable by<br />
adjustments at each sampling occasi<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 1). The<br />
incubati<strong>on</strong>s with <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> levels between 8 and 9 showed a<br />
maximum reducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> units between sampling<br />
days. In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.5 treatment, however, a reducti<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> units occurred between samplings, with<br />
1 excepti<strong>on</strong> at Day 7, where the reducti<strong>on</strong> was 0.5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
units. The nutrient c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NH 4 + , NO3 – ,<br />
NO 2 – and PO4 2– (Fig. 2) remained at the initial level in<br />
the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 to 9 incubati<strong>on</strong>s, with a slight decrease<br />
towards the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the experiment. However, while<br />
the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.5 incubati<strong>on</strong> experienced an increase in<br />
inorganic nutrients from the start <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the experiment to<br />
the end, an excepti<strong>on</strong> was found for PO 4 2– , which<br />
decreased to the detecti<strong>on</strong> limit after Day 3. The c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SiO 4 – in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 and 8.5 incubati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
remained at a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2 to 6 µM throughout<br />
the durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the experiment (Fig. 2). In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9<br />
incubati<strong>on</strong>, the SiO 4 – c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> increased to a<br />
maximum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12.5 µM at Day 7, whereafter it<br />
decreased to reach 9 µM at Day 14. In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.5<br />
incubati<strong>on</strong>, the SiO 4 – kept increasing throughout the<br />
experiment to reach a maximum c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
31 µM at Day 14.<br />
Fig. 1. <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s in the experimental bottles during the<br />
2 wk incubati<strong>on</strong>s. (y) <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8.0; (j) <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8.5; (S) <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.0; (m) <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
9.5. <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> was adjusted at each sampling date to keep the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>stant<br />
The plankt<strong>on</strong>ic <strong>community</strong><br />
Phytoplankt<strong>on</strong><br />
The phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> <strong>community</strong> was quantified in<br />
bulk using both chl a measurements and direct cell<br />
counts. The initial chl a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> was 2.4 µg l –1 in<br />
all treatments (Fig. 3A). In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 to 9 incubati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
the chl a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> increased 2- to 3-fold during<br />
the first 10 d. During the next 4 d, the chl a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />
stabilised in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 and 8.5 incubati<strong>on</strong>s, whereas<br />
the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9 incubati<strong>on</strong> experienced a further 3-fold<br />
increase. In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.5 incubati<strong>on</strong>, the chl a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />
declined more than 90% from Day 0 to 7. However,<br />
at the terminati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the experiment, the initial<br />
chl a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> was almost regained.<br />
The phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> biomass (estimated from direct<br />
counts) was initially 53 µg C l –1 (Fig. 3B). A general<br />
increase in biomass was observed in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 and<br />
8.5 incubati<strong>on</strong>s, increasing 3- and 14-fold, respectively.<br />
In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9 incubati<strong>on</strong>, no increase was observed<br />
during the first week; however, during the last<br />
week, the biomass increased to reach the same level as<br />
found in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8.5 incubati<strong>on</strong>. Unlike the other incubati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
a significant decrease was observed in the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.5 incubati<strong>on</strong> during the first week. However, during<br />
the following week an increase to almost the initial<br />
biomass occurred.<br />
The focus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> group was <strong>on</strong><br />
diatoms and din<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>lagellates because they were the<br />
most dominant classes in the present experiment<br />
(Fig. 3C,D). At the start <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the incubati<strong>on</strong>s, the din<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>lagellates<br />
dominated the phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> <strong>community</strong>.<br />
However, during the 2 wk incubati<strong>on</strong>, the relative<br />
importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diatoms increased at all <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> levels and<br />
they became dominant. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>pH</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 and 8.5, the diatoms<br />
21