Download File
Download File Download File
BOSWELL'S LETTERS^ Athenaum BoswELL*s letters enjoy the advantage of Feb. 1909 a mySterious history. They were written between 1758 and 1795, not without a view to publication, but were lost for more than fifty years. At Boulogne in 1850 Major Stone, of the East India Company, had the fortunate curiosity to examine a scrap of paper in which was wrapped some small purchase ; it turned out to be a letter signed by James Boswell, and was traced to the store of an itinerant paper-vendor, where the letters published in 1856 were discovered. The anonymous editor of this issue is conjectured with good reason, as we think by Mr. Seccombe, who introduces the volume, to have been a Philip Francis of the Middle Temple who became later Sir Philip of the Supreme Consular Court of the Levant ; but this matter also is obscure. The strangest mystery of all, however, is that these interesting, entertaining, in fact delightful letters, though on their first appearance " Letters of James Boswell to the Rev. W. J. Temple." (Sidgwick and Jackson.) 74
BOSWELL'S LETTERS 75 they created a mild literary sensation, till last December had never been reprinted. The volume before us is a reprint from the first edition, the introduction by Mr. Sec- combe being substituted for that of the original editor. We wish that Mr. Seccombe had been less modest less conservative at any rate. With his view that " the editing was admirably done " we cannot agree entirely. Francis, who has intercalated blocks of exe- gesis and comment between the letters, writes good, straightforward prose, and appears to have been a good, sensible sort of man. He has enlivened his editorial labours with irruptions of legal facetiousness and sagacious reflections. He admires Carlyle. But his lack of subtlety and his prodigious good sense make him incapable of appreciating the character of Boswell. Passages in the letters which seemed to him ridiculous he, in his solicitude for the reader's enjoyment, has been careful to print in italics ; for it is difficult to suppose that Boswell underlined them himself. The originals are again lost ; should the passages in it would follow question really be underlined, that Boswell was not unintentionally or un- consciously ridiculous ; that all his life he that he practised an elaborate mystification ; succeeded in hoodwinking the world that ; he enlightened Temple alone, who nevertheless
- Page 35 and 36: MONTAIGNE 23 moral code and the met
- Page 37 and 38: MONTAIGNE 25 Indeed, this admiratio
- Page 39 and 40: MONTAIGNE 27 not inappropriate, the
- Page 41 and 42: IBSEN 29 the romantic, invited to s
- Page 43 and 44: IBSEN 31 political thinker or a soc
- Page 45 and 46: IBSEN 33 greatness of Ibsen's art t
- Page 47 and 48: IBSEN 35 or his life to the ideal,
- Page 49 and 50: IBSEN 37 Ibsen's social and politic
- Page 51 and 52: IBSEN 39 tolerate. Men long for the
- Page 53 and 54: MISS COLERIDGE i THE greatest art i
- Page 55 and 56: MISS COLERIDGE 43 without demur tha
- Page 57 and 58: MISS COLERIDGE 45 Here is the first
- Page 59 and 60: MISS COLERIDGE 47 a shrinking fasti
- Page 61 and 62: MISS COLERIDGE 49 picture. Her life
- Page 63 and 64: PEACOCK 51 are as amateurish as the
- Page 65 and 66: PEACOCK 53 was folly, who judged ev
- Page 67 and 68: PEACOCK 55 century living in the ni
- Page 69 and 70: PEACOCK 57 the Conservative party ;
- Page 71 and 72: PEACOCK 59 Peacock's attitude towar
- Page 73 and 74: PEACOCK 61 curiosity and ; just as
- Page 75 and 76: PEACOCK 63 A letter to Hookham, dat
- Page 77 and 78: PEACOCK 65 who claims attention for
- Page 79 and 80: PEACOCK 67 His epitaph I wrote, as
- Page 81 and 82: PEACOCK 69 his relations with Shell
- Page 83 and 84: PEACOCK 71 most entertaining, and p
- Page 85: PEACOCK 73 sionately pursued imposs
- Page 89 and 90: BOSWELL'S LETTERS 77 the sheer trut
- Page 91 and 92: BOSWELL'S LETTERS 79 Boswell tells
- Page 93 and 94: BOSWELL'S LETTERS 81 plexities bese
- Page 95 and 96: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 83 ten
- Page 97 and 98: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 85 tere
- Page 99 and 100: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 87 What
- Page 101 and 102: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 89 with
- Page 103 and 104: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 91 gues
- Page 105 and 106: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 93 degr
- Page 107 and 108: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 95 high
- Page 109 and 110: CARLYLE'S LOVES AND LETTERS 97 a gr
- Page 111 and 112: THE LYSISTRATA 1 At XdjOtrey Te/xev
- Page 113 and 114: Rogers to give THE LYSISTRATA 101 u
- Page 115 and 116: THE LYSISTRATA 103 and arguments od
- Page 117 and 118: THE LYSISTRATA 105 war, came forth
- Page 119 and 120: THE LYSISTRATA 107 ludicrous ; but
- Page 121 and 122: THE LYSISTRATA 109 Fiercely they st
- Page 123 and 124: THE LYSISTRATA in artist than party
- Page 125 and 126: THE LYSISTRATA 113 Have inspired th
- Page 127 and 128: TRELAWNY'S LETTERS 1 ANY one who ha
- Page 129 and 130: TRELAWNY'S LETTERS 117 book we find
- Page 131 and 132: TRELAWNY'S LETTERS 119 As Trelawny
- Page 133 and 134: TRELAWNY'S LETTERS 121 though he co
- Page 135 and 136: TRELAWNY'S LETTERS 123 we should ha
BOSWELL'S LETTERS 75<br />
they created a mild literary sensation, till<br />
last December had never been reprinted.<br />
The volume before us is a reprint from the<br />
first edition, the introduction by Mr. Sec-<br />
combe being substituted for that of the<br />
original editor. We wish that Mr. Seccombe<br />
had been less modest less conservative at<br />
any rate. With his view that " the editing<br />
was admirably done " we cannot agree entirely.<br />
Francis, who has intercalated blocks of exe-<br />
gesis and comment between the letters, writes<br />
good, straightforward prose, and appears to<br />
have been a good, sensible sort of man. He has<br />
enlivened his editorial labours with irruptions<br />
of legal facetiousness and sagacious reflections.<br />
He admires Carlyle. But his lack of subtlety<br />
and his prodigious good sense make him incapable<br />
of appreciating the character of Boswell.<br />
Passages in the letters which seemed<br />
to him ridiculous he, in his solicitude for the<br />
reader's enjoyment, has been careful to print<br />
in italics ; for it is difficult to suppose that<br />
Boswell underlined them himself. The originals<br />
are again lost ; should the passages in<br />
it would follow<br />
question really be underlined,<br />
that Boswell was not unintentionally or un-<br />
consciously ridiculous ; that all his life he<br />
that he<br />
practised an elaborate mystification ;<br />
succeeded in hoodwinking the world that<br />
;<br />
he enlightened Temple alone, who nevertheless