Download File
Download File Download File
226 CONTEMPORARY ART Cezanne was a master. In London no one had heard of them, so it was decided out of hand that they were immoral aliens fit only to be thrown on the nearest bonfire. C6zanne was a butcher, Gauguin a farceur, Van Gogh a lunatic : that is what particularly disagreeable the critics said, and the public said " Heehaw." They reminded one of a pack of Victorian curates to whom the theory of natural selection had been too suddenly broken. Two years later Roger Fry and I collected and arranged at the Grafton Galleries an exhibition of contemporary French art Matisse, Picasso, Maillol, etc. Every one abroad had recognized these men as interesting artists of varying merit ; no one doubted that the movement they represented was sig- nificant and of promise. Only the English critics had learnt nothing. They never do ; they only teach. Here was something going on under their noses that might well turn out to be as important as the early fifteenth- century movement in Tuscany, and they went on directing the attention of their pupils to the work of Alfred Stevens. Here was the art of the East of China, Persia, and Turkestan being revealed to us by European scholars, and they went on messing about with English choir-stalls and sanctuary- rings.
CONTEMPORARY ART 227 Our critics and teachers provided, and continue to provide, an artistic education com- parable with the historical education provided by our board-schools. People who have been brought up to believe that the history of England is the history of Europe that it is a tale of unbroken victory, leadership, and power feel, when they hear of the ascendancy of France or of the House of Austria or of the till the comparative insignificance of England dawn of the eighteenth century, angry first and then incredulous. So they give themselves the least possible chance of hearing such unpalatable nonsense by living snugly in the slums and suburbs, where, persuaded that they have nothing to learn from damned foreigners, they continue to entertain each other with scraps of local and personal gossip. That is what our art criticism sounds like to cultivated people from abroad. A few months ago an extraordinarily fine Renoir, a recognized masterpiece of modern art, was hung in the National Gallery. Any young painter who may have seen and profited by it need not thank those directors of public taste, the critics. It was passed by in silence or with a nod by the bulk of our paid experts, who were much more pleased by a particularly poor but very large Puvis, which possibly reminded them in some obscure way of a pre-
- Page 187 and 188: THE LONDON SALON 175 But there is m
- Page 189 and 190: THE LONDON SALON 177 how admirable
- Page 191 and 192: II ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS IT i
- Page 193 and 194: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 181 for
- Page 195 and 196: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 183 int
- Page 197 and 198: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 185 I c
- Page 199 and 200: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 187 the
- Page 201 and 202: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 189 I
- Page 203 and 204: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 191 ow
- Page 205 and 206: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 193 ar
- Page 207 and 208: MARCHAND 195 5) would have been jus
- Page 209 and 210: MARCHAND 197 shall be glad to hear
- Page 211 and 212: V THE MANSARD GALLERY 1 THE collect
- Page 213 and 214: THE MANSARD GALLERY 201 appreciate
- Page 215 and 216: THE MANSARD GALLERY 203 ever, more
- Page 217 and 218: THE MANSARD GALLERY 205 lacks sensi
- Page 219 and 220: THE MANSARD GALLERY 207 saying so.
- Page 221 and 222: CONTEMPORARY ART IN ENGLAND ONLY la
- Page 223 and 224: CONTEMPORARY ART 211 and independen
- Page 225 and 226: CONTEMPORARY ART 213 is tolerated b
- Page 227 and 228: CONTEMPORARY ART 215 far more intel
- Page 229 and 230: CONTEMPORARY ART 217 to visit the L
- Page 231 and 232: CONTEMPORARY ART 219 before a great
- Page 233 and 234: CONTEMPORARY ART 221 tending ever t
- Page 235 and 236: CONTEMPORARY ART 223 burgher who ma
- Page 237: CONTEMPORARY ART 225 its too willin
- Page 241 and 242: CONTEMPORARY ART 229 of the Royal A
- Page 243 and 244: ART AND WAR* AN acquaintance of min
- Page 245 and 246: ART AND WAR 233 between ends and me
- Page 247 and 248: ART AND WAR 235 them there are bett
- Page 249 and 250: ART AND WAR 237 had escaped restora
- Page 251 and 252: ART AND WAR 239 emotion or the pass
- Page 253 and 254: ART AND WAR 241 continued existence
- Page 255 and 256: ART AND WAR 243 is my mission. They
- Page 257 and 258: ART AND WAR 245 Kublai Khan, that c
- Page 259 and 260: BEFORE THE WAR IT is to me a strang
- Page 261 and 262: BEFORE THE WAR 249 and some of the
- Page 263 and 264: BEFORE THE WAR 251 essence of socie
- Page 265 and 266: BEFORE THE WAR 253 with Beardsleyes
- Page 267 and 268: BEFORE THE WAR 255 beneath the scan
- Page 269 and 270: ABBAS, Shah, 163 Abbassi, Riza, 162
- Page 271 and 272: Marinetti, 88 Marivaux, 9, 10 Marqu
- Page 273 and 274: BY THE SAME AUTHOR ART Fourth Impre
- Page 275: PRESS OPINIONS ON "ART" " Mr. Bell
226 CONTEMPORARY ART<br />
Cezanne was a master. In London no one had<br />
heard of them, so it was decided out of hand<br />
that they were immoral aliens fit only to be<br />
thrown on the nearest bonfire. C6zanne was<br />
a butcher, Gauguin a farceur, Van Gogh a<br />
lunatic : that is what<br />
particularly disagreeable<br />
the critics said, and the public said " Heehaw."<br />
They reminded one of a pack of<br />
Victorian curates to whom the theory of<br />
natural selection had been too suddenly<br />
broken. Two years later Roger Fry and I<br />
collected and arranged at the Grafton Galleries<br />
an exhibition of contemporary French art<br />
Matisse, Picasso, Maillol, etc. Every one<br />
abroad had recognized these men as interesting<br />
artists of varying merit ; no one doubted<br />
that the movement they represented was sig-<br />
nificant and of promise. Only the English<br />
critics had learnt nothing. They never do ;<br />
they only teach. Here was something going<br />
on under their noses that might well turn<br />
out to be as important as the early fifteenth-<br />
century movement in Tuscany, and they<br />
went on directing the attention of their<br />
pupils<br />
to the work of Alfred Stevens. Here<br />
was the art of the East of China, Persia,<br />
and Turkestan being revealed to us by<br />
European scholars, and they went on messing<br />
about with English choir-stalls and sanctuary-<br />
rings.