Download File
Download File Download File
1 82 ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS exhibitions strikes me as an unnecessarily sharp tax on the patience. I do not grumble at the reappearance of Wyndham Lewis's Kermesse, which has been altered and greatly improved since its last appearance at the London Salon. Lewis promises to become that rare thing, a real academic artist. He is academic in the good sense of the word that is to say, he uses a formula of which he is the master and not the slave. He uses it as a means to vast organiza- to have tions of form, designed, I imagine, something of the austere and impressive unity of great architecture. He succeeds to a sur- prising degree. The enemy that dogs him in all his works is an excessive taste for life. He is inclined to modify his forms in the interest of drama and psychology, to the detriment of pure design. At times his simplifications and rhythms seem to be determined by a literary rather than a plastic conception. Probably this is not the kind of criticism which by now Wyndham Lewis must have learnt to disregard. He is more accustomed, I suspect, to hearing his work called " me- chanical " and " lifeless," and, in a sense, it is both. That is the price an artist must pay who sets himself to achieve the end that Lewis has in view. He who is working by formula towards the realization of a minutely definite
ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 183 intellectual plan must be willing, on occasions, to sacrifice the really valuable qualities of sensibility and handwriting as well as the adventitious charms that spring from happy flukes. Besides, I am not sure that Lewis has been blest with uncommon sensibility. The peculiar merits of Kermesse will become obvious to any one who, after contemplating that picture, turns sharp round and glances at the big canvas by Delaunay. Delaunay, according to Mr. Rutter, is " the protagonist " of what is known in Paris as " Orfeism " ; his picture, The Cardiff Football Team, is what used to be known in Paris as tres artiste. It is well made, but it is not made to wear. It is not what Cezanne would have called " quelque chose de solide et de durable comme 1'art des mus6es." It is a brighter, gayer, more attractive thing than Kermesse, but in construction it is less subtle and less solid : and a by comparison, it looks like a poster, poster, I believe, is what it is. It would be tedious to write at length about the French masters, considering how much has been written during the last twelve months in praise or blame of finer and more characteristic examples of their art. More profitably they may be used as a peg on which to hang a short sermon to their English imitators. Amongst these I do not reckon the painters of the
- Page 143 and 144: SOPHOCLES IN LONDON 131 our eccentr
- Page 145 and 146: SOPHOCLES IN LONDON 133 the latest
- Page 147 and 148: THE FLIGHT OF THE DRAGON * No one w
- Page 149 and 150: THE FLIGHT OF THE DRAGON 137 nings
- Page 151 and 152: THE FLIGHT OF THE DRAGON 139 ripe a
- Page 153 and 154: Greek or Christian in the primitive
- Page 155 and 156: THE FLIGHT OF THE DRAGON 143 the sp
- Page 157 and 158: THE FLIGHT OF THE DRAGON 145 jobber
- Page 159 and 160: WILLIAM MORRIS 147 " William Morris
- Page 161 and 162: WILLIAM MORRIS 149 that much of the
- Page 163 and 164: WILLIAM MORRIS 151 in the Floods "
- Page 165 and 166: WILLIAM MORRIS 153 next morning for
- Page 167 and 168: WILLIAM MORRIS 155 affairs and priv
- Page 169 and 170: PERSIAN MINIATURES 157 1258 (the ye
- Page 171 and 172: PERSIAN MINIATURES 159 thirteenth c
- Page 173 and 174: PERSIAN MINIATURES 161 It is, in fa
- Page 175 and 176: PERSIAN MINIATURES 163 I will sugge
- Page 177 and 178: COUNTERCHECK QUARREL- SOME I HASTEN
- Page 179 and 180: COUNTERCHECK QUARRELSOME 167 does n
- Page 181 and 182: 169 the beauty of gems or of a butt
- Page 183 and 184: COUNTERCHECK QUARRELSOME 171 The po
- Page 185 and 186: COUNTERCHECK QUARRELSOME 173 they h
- Page 187 and 188: THE LONDON SALON 175 But there is m
- Page 189 and 190: THE LONDON SALON 177 how admirable
- Page 191 and 192: II ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS IT i
- Page 193: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 181 for
- Page 197 and 198: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 185 I c
- Page 199 and 200: ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS 187 the
- Page 201 and 202: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 189 I
- Page 203 and 204: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 191 ow
- Page 205 and 206: AN EXPENSIVE " MASTERPIECE " 193 ar
- Page 207 and 208: MARCHAND 195 5) would have been jus
- Page 209 and 210: MARCHAND 197 shall be glad to hear
- Page 211 and 212: V THE MANSARD GALLERY 1 THE collect
- Page 213 and 214: THE MANSARD GALLERY 201 appreciate
- Page 215 and 216: THE MANSARD GALLERY 203 ever, more
- Page 217 and 218: THE MANSARD GALLERY 205 lacks sensi
- Page 219 and 220: THE MANSARD GALLERY 207 saying so.
- Page 221 and 222: CONTEMPORARY ART IN ENGLAND ONLY la
- Page 223 and 224: CONTEMPORARY ART 211 and independen
- Page 225 and 226: CONTEMPORARY ART 213 is tolerated b
- Page 227 and 228: CONTEMPORARY ART 215 far more intel
- Page 229 and 230: CONTEMPORARY ART 217 to visit the L
- Page 231 and 232: CONTEMPORARY ART 219 before a great
- Page 233 and 234: CONTEMPORARY ART 221 tending ever t
- Page 235 and 236: CONTEMPORARY ART 223 burgher who ma
- Page 237 and 238: CONTEMPORARY ART 225 its too willin
- Page 239 and 240: CONTEMPORARY ART 227 Our critics an
- Page 241 and 242: CONTEMPORARY ART 229 of the Royal A
- Page 243 and 244: ART AND WAR* AN acquaintance of min
1 82 ENGLISH POST-IMPRESSIONISTS<br />
exhibitions strikes me as an unnecessarily<br />
sharp tax on the patience.<br />
I do not grumble at the reappearance of<br />
Wyndham Lewis's Kermesse, which has been<br />
altered and greatly improved since its last<br />
appearance at the London Salon. Lewis<br />
promises to become that rare thing, a real<br />
academic artist. He is academic in the good<br />
sense of the word that is to<br />
say, he uses a<br />
formula of which he is the master and not the<br />
slave. He uses it as a means to vast organiza-<br />
to have<br />
tions of form, designed, I imagine,<br />
something of the austere and impressive unity<br />
of great architecture. He succeeds to a sur-<br />
prising degree. The enemy that dogs him in<br />
all his works is an excessive taste for life.<br />
He is inclined to modify his forms in the<br />
interest of drama and psychology, to the<br />
detriment of pure design. At times his simplifications<br />
and rhythms seem to be determined<br />
by a literary rather than a plastic conception.<br />
Probably this is not the kind of criticism<br />
which by now Wyndham Lewis must have<br />
learnt to disregard. He is more accustomed,<br />
I suspect, to hearing his work called " me-<br />
chanical " and " lifeless," and, in a sense, it<br />
is both. That is the price an artist must pay<br />
who sets himself to achieve the end that Lewis<br />
has in view. He who is working by formula<br />
towards the realization of a minutely definite