07.04.2013 Views

Download File

Download File

Download File

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNTERCHECK QUARRELSOME 171<br />

The poor fellow who has gone through with a<br />

picture to the very end and has got it hung<br />

will always, I suspect, consider it a work of<br />

art ; and I hope that some of his friends will<br />

have the humanity to back him up. Therefore<br />

. . . well, we must be catholic. But<br />

Mr. Randall Davies, who deals out, week<br />

after week, column after column of aesthetic<br />

judgments, may surely be invited by his<br />

readers to disclose the criteria by which he<br />

distinguishes between works of art and rubbish.<br />

If a work of art be that which any one judges<br />

to be a work of art, we may as well consult<br />

the first policeman we meet instead of going<br />

for an opinion to a paid expert.<br />

If Mr. Davies had understood the very<br />

simple language in which I stated my position,<br />

he would have realized that when I say that<br />

Paddington Station is not a work of art I mean<br />

that Paddington Station does not provoke in<br />

me an aesthetic emotion, and that I believe we<br />

can have no reason for thinking a thing to be<br />

a work of art except that we feel it to be one.<br />

Paddington Station did not move me ;<br />

there-<br />

fore I had no reason for judging it a work of<br />

art, but, of course, I may have looked at the<br />

picture stupidly and remained insensitive to<br />

the real significance<br />

of its forms. If Mr.<br />

Davies had understood the very simple language<br />

in which I stated my position, he would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!