07.04.2013 Views

Download File

Download File

Download File

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 COUNTERCHECK QUARRELSOME<br />

the editor, being a polite man, would reply,<br />

I suppose, that his critic had misunderstood<br />

the policy of the paper : he would not feel<br />

that his arguments had received any very<br />

damaging blow. In my first I chapter made<br />

it clear my publishers accused me of becoming<br />

repetitious about it that what I<br />

wanted to discover was a quality common<br />

and peculiar to all those objects I called works<br />

of art ; I explained that by " works of art "<br />

I meant objects that provoked in me a<br />

peculiar emotion, called aesthetic ; and I<br />

repeated over and over again that amongst<br />

these objects were pictures, pots, textiles,<br />

statues, buildings, etc. Mr. Davies's sharp<br />

eyes have enabled him to perceive either that<br />

my hypothesis that " significant form " is<br />

the essential quality in a work of art leads<br />

to the inclusion of Persian carpets amongst<br />

works of art, or that the hypothesis that<br />

representation<br />

is the essence of art excludes<br />

them : I am not sure which. Anyway, this<br />

much is certain, either both pictures and<br />

carpets can be works of art or they cannot.<br />

I set out from the hypothesis that pictures<br />

and carpets, or rather some pictures and some<br />

carpets, are works of art ; and therefore I am<br />

less inclined to feel crushed by Mr. Davies's<br />

discovery that my premises follow from my<br />

conclusions than to inquire why Mr. Davies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!