07.04.2013 Views

samdev issues and options responses broseley.pdf - Shropshire ...

samdev issues and options responses broseley.pdf - Shropshire ...

samdev issues and options responses broseley.pdf - Shropshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of SAMDev Responses: Broseley Place Plan Area<br />

Settlement Barrow<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Councillor P J Robins Broseley Town Coun<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Maintain industrial<br />

/ commercial use<br />

of old farm<br />

buildings in<br />

Posenhall area<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Mrs Chris And Option A Option A The Barrow<br />

Parish Plan<br />

(to which<br />

40% of<br />

households<br />

contributed)<br />

identifies<br />

its rural<br />

developmen<br />

t needs<br />

which are<br />

different to<br />

those of<br />

nearby<br />

Broseley<br />

Nil The green corridor<br />

between Benthall<br />

<strong>and</strong> Broseley,<br />

running in a northsouth<br />

direction<br />

has always been<br />

recognised as an<br />

important<br />

development<br />

barrier. This, <strong>and</strong><br />

the rest of Barrow<br />

parish should be<br />

protected<br />

As per the<br />

Barrow<br />

Parish Plan,<br />

small<br />

settlements<br />

need to be<br />

protected<br />

from the<br />

development<br />

aspirations of<br />

their<br />

neighbours<br />

Protection of highly valued<br />

countryside<br />

Opti Option A Yes Infill <strong>and</strong> extensions only<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Mr Patrick Larkin Option A Option A<br />

Including Benthall within the<br />

Broseley area implies the<br />

assumption that the views of<br />

Benthall residents are the<br />

same as those of Broseley.<br />

This is not the case as shown<br />

in the Barrow Parish Plan.<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 1 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Councillor P J Robins Broseley Town Coun Option B Option C Recreationa<br />

l facilities:<br />

continued<br />

investment<br />

in the<br />

Birchmeado<br />

w area -<br />

both B<br />

Centre <strong>and</strong><br />

Park.<br />

Complete<br />

centre café<br />

/ kitchen<br />

improveme<br />

nts. Bring<br />

MUGA to<br />

fruition (on<br />

neighbourin<br />

g school<br />

field) <strong>and</strong><br />

improveme<br />

nts to B<br />

Park<br />

changing<br />

rooms to<br />

serve<br />

increased<br />

usage<br />

generated<br />

by MUGA.<br />

If housing<br />

areas north<br />

of the<br />

Church St /<br />

High St<br />

areas are<br />

chosen,<br />

this would<br />

allow spine<br />

rd access<br />

E <strong>and</strong> W<br />

off Dark<br />

Lane, so<br />

that the<br />

existing E-<br />

W route<br />

through the<br />

centre of<br />

the town<br />

could have<br />

some relief<br />

from<br />

Desperate need for affordable<br />

housing in the town (for all age<br />

groups). Recent experience<br />

means only 7.2/yr completed<br />

<strong>and</strong> very few social housing, so<br />

even natural population increase<br />

is not being met, let alone inmigration<br />

numbers<br />

Opti Affordable housing<br />

<strong>and</strong> footpaths /<br />

cycle paths<br />

connecting to town<br />

centre <strong>and</strong> local<br />

schools<br />

(preferably off<br />

road) to<br />

encourage non car<br />

use<br />

Option C Yes: still Development near town<br />

centre, not on periphery - town<br />

is already 2.5km long, but<br />

often only 0.5km wide, so<br />

needs fattening up, especially<br />

near the centre.<br />

Direction: north <strong>and</strong> south of<br />

town centre: l<strong>and</strong> north of<br />

Church St / High St between<br />

Dark Lane <strong>and</strong> Ironbridge Rd.<br />

Also l<strong>and</strong> south of Bridgnorth<br />

Rd / Parkview (Fiery Fields)<br />

12 March 2012 Page 2 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

As both B4376<br />

<strong>and</strong> B4373 are<br />

now open to<br />

HGV's, l<strong>and</strong> off<br />

Bridgnorth Rd<br />

becomes the most<br />

accessible to<br />

transport. So l<strong>and</strong><br />

near Fiery Fields /<br />

Willey Estates<br />

near the Lodge or<br />

the Dunge makes<br />

sense.<br />

All areas shown in<br />

leaflet as identified<br />

open space, plus<br />

the Haycop<br />

between Dark<br />

Lane <strong>and</strong><br />

Ironbridge Rd,<br />

plus Penns<br />

Meadow (Speeds<br />

Lane to Bridge<br />

Rd). The Severn<br />

Gorge Countryside<br />

Trust l<strong>and</strong> must<br />

also remain for<br />

recreation etc.<br />

Woodhouse<br />

Rd: This<br />

site must<br />

remain a<br />

car park for<br />

the social<br />

club /<br />

bowling<br />

green since<br />

if it were<br />

built on then<br />

parking by<br />

visitors<br />

would<br />

become<br />

impossible<br />

<strong>and</strong> this<br />

would<br />

endanger its<br />

recreational<br />

Broseley <strong>and</strong><br />

Barrow are<br />

effectively<br />

suburbs of<br />

Telford <strong>and</strong><br />

many<br />

residents<br />

seek to work<br />

there.<br />

Broseley<br />

lacks many<br />

jobs, but they<br />

are nearby.<br />

However,<br />

BTW Council<br />

must ensure<br />

adequate<br />

roads<br />

through the<br />

Gorge.<br />

Therefore<br />

please liaise<br />

with their<br />

planners to<br />

maintain<br />

easy transit<br />

in the<br />

Ironbridge /<br />

The Lloyds<br />

areas.<br />

congestion.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Very little (if<br />

any) contact<br />

with travellers<br />

seeking<br />

pitches<br />

overnight or<br />

longer.<br />

Therefore<br />

largely<br />

irrelevant<br />

Release of l<strong>and</strong> for housing:<br />

You point out that l<strong>and</strong><br />

release for phased<br />

development in five year time<br />

b<strong>and</strong>s is your objective.<br />

However, if Broseley's major<br />

allocated housing site (for 90<br />

houses) does not commence<br />

in approx 2011, does this<br />

mean that alternative sites<br />

cannot be released so that<br />

major housing development<br />

can happen? If not, then we<br />

will never get c.35% of them<br />

affordable, so will continue to<br />

have a desperate shortage.<br />

What happens to an allocated<br />

site that isn't developed in a<br />

reasonable time scale? Can<br />

you revoke the permission oe<br />

merely wait for it to lapse?<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Darren Riley Acton Round Builder Opit B/C Yes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

David Keyse Gallagher Estates E -100 B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Dr Jephcott A<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 3 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Dr Jan Ensum A cycle lanes<br />

<strong>and</strong> cycle<br />

racks<br />

allotments<br />

improved<br />

public<br />

transport<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Ian Johnston Option A Option C Recreationa<br />

l facilities<br />

for 16 to 25<br />

year age<br />

range<br />

Improved<br />

community<br />

centre<br />

Improved<br />

social care<br />

facilities<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

On l<strong>and</strong> adjacent<br />

to Ironbridge Road<br />

(map 25 & 23<br />

L<strong>and</strong> off Rough<br />

Lane (Map 21)<br />

has already been<br />

turned down for<br />

planning<br />

permission twice.<br />

This area was<br />

designated a<br />

Wildlife Site by the<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong><br />

Wildlife Trust with<br />

hundreds of plant<br />

<strong>and</strong> animal<br />

species identified<br />

<strong>and</strong> it’s loss would<br />

be a loss not only<br />

to Broseley but the<br />

countries<br />

biodiversity in<br />

general.<br />

Option C Yes North east to south west:<br />

Broseley has developed in the<br />

general directions of<br />

Bridgnorth <strong>and</strong> Ironbridge <strong>and</strong><br />

is in danger of becoming two<br />

separate communities so<br />

priority should be given on<br />

development close to the<br />

village centre in a North East<br />

<strong>and</strong> South West direction.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> off Rough Lane (Map 21) Areas of<br />

most concern are increased traffic onto<br />

the Coalport Road junction <strong>and</strong> past the<br />

John Wilkinson school which at the<br />

beginning <strong>and</strong> end of the school day is<br />

already very heavy <strong>and</strong> any increase in<br />

this flow of traffic would pose a<br />

substantial threat to the school pupils<br />

who lost their Trafic Controll person<br />

(lollipop lady) some years ago.<br />

This l<strong>and</strong> is liable to subsidence due to<br />

the extensive mining that has taken<br />

place here <strong>and</strong> a gas main balances<br />

pipe passes through it <strong>and</strong> would be a<br />

potential danger to any dwellings built in<br />

its proximity<br />

The access to <strong>and</strong> from the southern<br />

end of Broseley via Coalport Road <strong>and</strong><br />

over Coalport bridge, which has a weight<br />

restriction, is heavily used already <strong>and</strong> at<br />

peak travel times close to its maximum,<br />

I feel any increase in this would involve<br />

major infrastructure alterations with road<br />

widening, roundabouts, traffic lights for<br />

pedestrian crossings <strong>and</strong> even a new<br />

bridge,<br />

12 March 2012 Page 4 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Kingswood Road Lan Kingswood Road La Option B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 5 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

L M Farlow Option B Option A Improved<br />

facilities for<br />

young<br />

people in<br />

Broseley<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Benthall by<br />

funding<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

developing<br />

the<br />

Bichmeado<br />

w centre to<br />

exp<strong>and</strong> use<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

improve<br />

existing<br />

facilities;<br />

Road repair<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

resurfacing;<br />

Ensure that<br />

the Lady<br />

Forester<br />

Day Care<br />

centre<br />

stays open<br />

for the<br />

elderly of<br />

the area<br />

<strong>and</strong> is not<br />

threatened<br />

with<br />

closure like<br />

its sister<br />

facility in<br />

Much<br />

Wenlock;<br />

Street<br />

lighting -<br />

maintained<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

sustainable<br />

energy<br />

investigated<br />

;<br />

Fund<br />

community<br />

involvement<br />

in the<br />

developmen<br />

t of<br />

sporting<br />

Broseley (but not Benthall)<br />

Needs more affordable housing<br />

for younf people <strong>and</strong> families<br />

Opti Affordable housing;<br />

Parking, improved<br />

transport <strong>and</strong><br />

roads;<br />

Amenities: e.g.<br />

medical centre;<br />

drainage services<br />

Option B Yes Direction: North-East: l<strong>and</strong> to<br />

the East of Ironbridge Rd<br />

12 March 2012 Page 6 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

recreational<br />

facilities<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Miss Claire Install British Dragonfly So Option B Option C<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 7 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Bennett East Broseley Resid 100 Option A: 0 New road<br />

system <strong>and</strong><br />

bridge over<br />

River<br />

Severn in<br />

East<br />

Broseley<br />

between<br />

Coalport<br />

Road <strong>and</strong><br />

A442.<br />

New<br />

drainage /<br />

sewerage<br />

system in<br />

Esat<br />

Broseley:<br />

current<br />

limited<br />

facilities<br />

barely cope<br />

with<br />

present<br />

residential<br />

area.<br />

Better<br />

public<br />

transport<br />

facilities for<br />

potential<br />

extra<br />

workers<br />

employed<br />

'across the<br />

Severn'<br />

(Telford /<br />

Shrewsbury<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Wolverham<br />

pton /<br />

Dudley).<br />

Need to exp<strong>and</strong> centre not<br />

fragment to peripheral edges of<br />

the town<br />

Opti Children's play<br />

area<br />

Better bus<br />

facilities:<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong><br />

routes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

East Brodeley: 2<br />

sites identified on<br />

marked map<br />

provided for flora /<br />

fauna interest:<br />

currently farml<strong>and</strong><br />

or green field l<strong>and</strong><br />

growth direction: North<br />

L<strong>and</strong> to the north of Church<br />

Street (marked map provided)<br />

The objections to further development in<br />

East Broseley were clearly outlined in<br />

the documents supplied in 2001. These<br />

objections remain valid today <strong>and</strong> are<br />

available in your archives.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 8 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Bennett East Broseley Resid<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Kidson Albrighton Parish Co Option B Option B yes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Although almost 10 years have passed<br />

since we objected to any further building<br />

in East Broseley, the principles behind<br />

our formal objections at that time,<br />

remain the same. Vehemently opposed<br />

to any further building development in<br />

this area. The reasons given were all<br />

objectively proposed <strong>and</strong> were backed<br />

by the East Broseley residents (a<br />

petition with over 2000 signatures was<br />

forwarded to the council at the time). All<br />

this information should be archived <strong>and</strong><br />

well documented within the Council<br />

offices, (the recipient/custodian of these<br />

documents at that time was Karen<br />

Sinclair).<br />

Mr Mrs Chris And Option A Option A A commercial centre Option C Yes South-east<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

nil<br />

12 March 2012 Page 9 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Mrs John Rita Object to development of l<strong>and</strong><br />

between Pound Lane <strong>and</strong><br />

Rough Lane, particularly the<br />

section between Forester Rd<br />

<strong>and</strong> Rough Lane. L<strong>and</strong> is<br />

identified in SMR in<br />

recognition of its<br />

archaeological significance -<br />

important to local tourist<br />

economy. Industrial past<br />

means the site has<br />

considerable wildlife value.<br />

Significant adverse traffic<br />

impacts would be generated.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> previously rejected for<br />

development on a number of<br />

occasions. Continued<br />

identification is stressful for<br />

local residents<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Adam Murray Harworth Estates Option D Improve<br />

pedestrian<br />

access <strong>and</strong><br />

footpaths in<br />

north-east<br />

area<br />

Need to<br />

provide<br />

affordable<br />

housing in<br />

western area.<br />

Should be<br />

mix of<br />

executive<br />

housing <strong>and</strong><br />

affordable.<br />

Harworth<br />

Estates own<br />

additional<br />

l<strong>and</strong> to the<br />

West of<br />

Broseley<br />

which could<br />

help to deliver<br />

the<br />

development<br />

required.<br />

Sustain <strong>and</strong> enhance services &<br />

amenities<br />

Opti Affordable Housing No West:<br />

L<strong>and</strong> to the west of Bridge Rd,<br />

identified on map provided<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Mr And Mrs B A An A B<br />

Development in the<br />

Countryside:<br />

Important that old farm<br />

buildings which are falling into<br />

disrepair can be brought back<br />

into beneficial use. This will<br />

improve their appearance <strong>and</strong><br />

that of the surrounding<br />

countryside<br />

Review of green<br />

belt <strong>and</strong><br />

countryside<br />

policies to ensure<br />

that development<br />

can be located in<br />

the most<br />

sustainable areas.<br />

Policies need to<br />

be flexible to<br />

ensure that<br />

housing need can<br />

be met over the<br />

whole Plan period.<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 10 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Andrew Murphy Newpool Constructio Option A<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Charles David Pilli C C<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 11 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr David Rogers Option A Option A The road<br />

infrastructur<br />

e to <strong>and</strong><br />

within<br />

Broseley is<br />

at present<br />

only just<br />

adequate<br />

for the<br />

existing<br />

town <strong>and</strong><br />

can not<br />

sustain<br />

further<br />

material<br />

expansion<br />

of the<br />

town. The<br />

M54 is the<br />

major road<br />

route to the<br />

area.<br />

Between<br />

the M54<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Broseley is<br />

the<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Gorge,<br />

therefore to<br />

reach<br />

Broseley<br />

traffic must:<br />

the River<br />

Severn by<br />

either of<br />

two<br />

bridges,<br />

both with<br />

weight<br />

restrictions<br />

<strong>and</strong> one<br />

being a<br />

single track<br />

bridge with<br />

height<br />

restrictions<br />

as well.<br />

Either<br />

bridge<br />

necessitate<br />

s the use<br />

Minimal<br />

investment only to<br />

retain the exising<br />

character of the<br />

town.<br />

Option A Yes south - See as marked G on<br />

map attached<br />

12 March 2012 Page 12 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

of very<br />

narrow<br />

roads <strong>and</strong><br />

tight 180<br />

degree<br />

bends.<br />

Both<br />

bridges are<br />

connected<br />

on the<br />

Ironbridge<br />

side by<br />

another<br />

very narrow<br />

road with<br />

20 mph<br />

speed<br />

limits which<br />

is liable to<br />

subsidence,<br />

or;<br />

long detour<br />

via<br />

Bridgnorth<br />

or Much<br />

Wenlock.<br />

Numerous<br />

delivery<br />

drivers<br />

have been<br />

very<br />

frustrated<br />

at how<br />

difficult it is<br />

to access<br />

the town.<br />

In addition<br />

in the snow<br />

<strong>and</strong> ice the<br />

roads out<br />

of<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Gorge are<br />

so steep<br />

that<br />

vehicles<br />

inevitably<br />

get stuck<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

ad<strong>and</strong>oned<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

residents<br />

cannot get<br />

to work or<br />

12 March 2012 Page 13 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

No due to poor<br />

road infrastructure<br />

it would not benefit<br />

the town to<br />

encourage more<br />

employment in the<br />

town.<br />

See area marked<br />

P on the map.<br />

There is already a<br />

large nature trail<br />

next to this site (<br />

not indicated on<br />

your map) which<br />

runs between<br />

Ironbridge Road<br />

<strong>and</strong> Dark Lane.<br />

Many hours have<br />

been spent by the<br />

cannot get<br />

home at<br />

night.<br />

Within<br />

Broseley<br />

many of<br />

the older<br />

houses do<br />

not have<br />

drives<br />

resulting in<br />

cars<br />

parked in<br />

already<br />

narrow<br />

roads<br />

resulting in<br />

dangerous<br />

congestion.<br />

The town<br />

presently<br />

has a<br />

plentiful<br />

supply of<br />

one, two<br />

<strong>and</strong> three<br />

bedroom<br />

houses,<br />

churches,<br />

schools,<br />

shops open<br />

areas etc<br />

<strong>and</strong> does<br />

not need<br />

further<br />

developmen<br />

t in order to<br />

sustain the<br />

town<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 14 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

local community in<br />

recent years in<br />

bringing this area<br />

back to how it was<br />

50 years ago, with<br />

a stream <strong>and</strong> a<br />

small pond being<br />

recreated, a bird<br />

watching hide<br />

being built, trees<br />

being cut, paths<br />

being laid etc.<br />

The area marked<br />

also has another<br />

pond which could<br />

be recreated <strong>and</strong><br />

has an active<br />

badger set.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 15 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Deryck Roberts Option C Option B Affordable housing Option C Yes Central: L<strong>and</strong> close to the<br />

in a central location<br />

centre of Broseley, situated<br />

east <strong>and</strong> adjoining Dark Lane.<br />

Development on the centrally<br />

located site would be a<br />

sustainable location as it joins<br />

onto the existing residential<br />

area allowing easy access to<br />

the services that the<br />

settlement has to offer. This<br />

would be a more appropriate<br />

housing site rather than<br />

extending out on the periphery<br />

of the settlement, elongating<br />

the settlement <strong>and</strong> providing<br />

housing at a substantial<br />

distance from the main high<br />

street <strong>and</strong> several of the<br />

services. Please see map<br />

attached.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Managing the release of<br />

housing l<strong>and</strong>:<br />

We do not support the<br />

proposal of releasing housing<br />

sites to phase development in<br />

five year time b<strong>and</strong>s as<br />

phasing is a natural<br />

progression <strong>and</strong> the needs<br />

<strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s of the area will<br />

be highlighted in due course.<br />

Once a site has been<br />

identified for housing there<br />

should not be a set time<br />

scale of when the l<strong>and</strong> can be<br />

developed.<br />

Managing the Green Belt/<br />

Development in the<br />

Countryside:<br />

Each settlement has its own<br />

identity <strong>and</strong> needs <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore developments<br />

should be judged individually<br />

depending on the<br />

circumstances of the<br />

proposal. The guidance which<br />

will be provided should take<br />

this into consideration <strong>and</strong> be<br />

available to adapt for each<br />

settlement.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 16 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Graham Lyon Option A Extra car<br />

parking;<br />

traffic lights<br />

at junction<br />

of<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Rd <strong>and</strong><br />

Coalport<br />

Rd;<br />

Cycle<br />

facilities<br />

incl cycle<br />

lanes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

L<strong>and</strong> off Rough<br />

Lane: Site 21 on<br />

annotated map:<br />

wildlife<br />

designation,<br />

historic interest<br />

<strong>and</strong> mining legacy<br />

<strong>issues</strong>.<br />

Sheet<br />

attached<br />

considering a<br />

range of<br />

<strong>issues</strong><br />

highlighted<br />

with respect<br />

to potential<br />

sites<br />

previously<br />

considered<br />

by BDC<br />

Additional development in Broseley<br />

would put further pressure on existing<br />

congested roads: a range of specific<br />

<strong>issues</strong> are highlighted.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 17 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Ian Kilby <strong>Shropshire</strong> Council There are known l<strong>and</strong> stability<br />

<strong>issues</strong> in Broseley which need<br />

to be considred in allocating<br />

any l<strong>and</strong> for development. We<br />

hope that background<br />

information survives from the<br />

preparation of the current local<br />

plan survives which will assist<br />

here. Our view is that the<br />

scatter of small sites in the<br />

northern part of the plan do<br />

not justify consideration as<br />

specific allocations <strong>and</strong> policy<br />

BRO2 remains relevant in<br />

terms of the <strong>issues</strong> it raise<br />

considered view the l<strong>and</strong> to<br />

the east should be the main<br />

area for future growth of the<br />

town. Our feeling is that the<br />

size of Broseley <strong>and</strong> the<br />

services it offers would justify<br />

an allocation being made.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr James Downing A Yes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr James Wall Promotes 1ha of l<strong>and</strong> off<br />

Cherrybrook Drive for housing,<br />

light industry or mixed uses<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 18 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr John Jowitt PJ Planning Option C Option B Existing Key Settlement, has the<br />

facilities to support expansion to<br />

meet its needs <strong>and</strong> the<br />

opportunity to do so.<br />

Development previously<br />

constrained by unsuitable<br />

housing allocation<br />

Sustainable Design <strong>and</strong><br />

Managing the Release of<br />

Housing L<strong>and</strong>:<br />

Support proposals<br />

Opti Affordable housing<br />

to meet local<br />

needs<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Type <strong>and</strong> affordability of<br />

Housing, <strong>and</strong> Developer<br />

contributions to infrastructure:<br />

Support proposals subject to<br />

viability<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Keith Rendell Option A Option A Potential<br />

expansion<br />

of Dark<br />

Lane<br />

School for<br />

sports<br />

facilities<br />

<strong>and</strong> youth<br />

centre<br />

activities<br />

Dark Lane<br />

School:<br />

develop<br />

facilities for<br />

community<br />

use<br />

Option D Yes South-west:<br />

L<strong>and</strong> south-west of Mill Lane –<br />

see plan attached. Well<br />

related to the existing village<br />

centre, well screened from the<br />

wider countryside, well related<br />

to existing housing <strong>and</strong> with<br />

suitable access points.<br />

Recreational Option B Yes Central <strong>and</strong> West<br />

Infill - l<strong>and</strong> near centre of<br />

village to support shops <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses. Develop west of<br />

Ironbridge Road<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr L E Oakley Barrow Parish Coun Option B Option B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

No None<br />

12 March 2012 Page 19 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr L E Oakley Beckbury PC Option A Option A In each<br />

town there<br />

already<br />

exists a<br />

substantial<br />

need to<br />

improve<br />

the<br />

infrastructur<br />

e,<br />

particularly<br />

the roads,<br />

<strong>and</strong> their<br />

maintenanc<br />

e, provision<br />

of parking<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

surface<br />

drainage of<br />

flood water.<br />

Before any<br />

further<br />

developmen<br />

t takes<br />

place the<br />

existing<br />

infrastructur<br />

e should be<br />

improved<br />

<strong>and</strong> further<br />

developmen<br />

t should<br />

insure the<br />

further<br />

improveme<br />

nt<br />

necessary<br />

to meet the<br />

new<br />

requirement<br />

s.<br />

The various Villages are all<br />

individual centres <strong>and</strong><br />

independent of each other <strong>and</strong><br />

would wish to remain so.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 20 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Len Marlow Option C Option D 1.<br />

1. NEEDS INDUSTRY<br />

Developme historically it was self sufficient<br />

nt mainly in industry <strong>and</strong> this needs to<br />

around return. For example move the<br />

Ironbridge council buildings from Westgate<br />

Road. i.e. to Broseley <strong>and</strong> develpop<br />

that is to Westgate as housing where it<br />

East of would have a premium value.<br />

Broseley 2. There is also a need for start<br />

2. All up industry space, perhaps a<br />

Housing to<br />

have south<br />

facing<br />

roves for<br />

Solar<br />

panels <strong>and</strong><br />

to<br />

accommoda<br />

te larger<br />

size hot<br />

water tanks<br />

for this<br />

purpose.<br />

3. One of<br />

the<br />

industrial<br />

developmen<br />

ts should<br />

be a<br />

biogass<br />

plant on<br />

Ironbridge<br />

road<br />

adjacent to<br />

a housing<br />

developmen<br />

t so that<br />

heat output<br />

can be<br />

used in a<br />

district grid<br />

– this could<br />

be a social<br />

housing<br />

developmen<br />

t. This<br />

should be<br />

planned in<br />

to avoid the<br />

problems<br />

that arose<br />

in Ludlow<br />

with their<br />

live/work industrial estate.<br />

Opti 1. Mixed dwellings<br />

but to include<br />

studio <strong>and</strong> 1<br />

bedroom flats –<br />

also SOCIAL<br />

HOUSING.<br />

2. Currently the<br />

Methodist church<br />

has been looking<br />

at housing for 16-<br />

18 year olds this<br />

possibility should<br />

be developed with<br />

them<br />

3. We need to do<br />

more for young<br />

people in<br />

Broseley, They<br />

don’t have a<br />

school <strong>and</strong> as<br />

such have no<br />

“place” to relate to.<br />

On these grounds<br />

alone <strong>Shropshire</strong><br />

owes it to the<br />

Young People of<br />

Broseley to build a<br />

youth facility I<br />

believe a rebuilt<br />

Birchmeadow<br />

centre should do<br />

this <strong>and</strong><br />

redevelopment of<br />

Victoria hall<br />

should offer adult<br />

<strong>and</strong> family<br />

facitlites. Both<br />

could have one<br />

management/boar<br />

d.<br />

4. No Industry no<br />

houses<br />

east - 1. Mixed development<br />

of commercial – industrial –<br />

retail <strong>and</strong> housing between<br />

Ironbridge road <strong>and</strong> Dark<br />

Lane. Also to the EAST side<br />

of Ironbridge Road.<br />

2. Existing housing<br />

commitment on Dark Lane<br />

would be better developed as<br />

a town Park with some social<br />

housing – especially third age<br />

tenants<br />

12 March 2012 Page 21 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

biogass<br />

developmen<br />

t.<br />

4.<br />

Developme<br />

nt of<br />

Victoria<br />

Hall with<br />

glass<br />

atrium<br />

extension<br />

over road<br />

that runs<br />

along side<br />

building<br />

forming<br />

new foyer<br />

<strong>and</strong> public<br />

area’s. This<br />

would then<br />

become<br />

main<br />

theatre/film/<br />

music<br />

venue <strong>and</strong><br />

the Birch<br />

Meadow<br />

site can be<br />

developed<br />

for sports<br />

<strong>and</strong> youth<br />

work.<br />

5. To<br />

compliment<br />

this<br />

developmen<br />

t a new<br />

road link<br />

should be<br />

cut through<br />

from<br />

Ironbridge<br />

road to<br />

Dark Lane,<br />

though<br />

proposed<br />

developmen<br />

t l<strong>and</strong>. This<br />

would form<br />

new bus<br />

route into<br />

Brosely<br />

turning in<br />

an arc<br />

through<br />

12 March 2012 Page 22 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

current<br />

Gardens<br />

outside<br />

Victoria hall<br />

<strong>and</strong> leaving<br />

more public<br />

on shop<br />

frontage fro<br />

developmen<br />

t of<br />

Saturday<br />

market<br />

type<br />

facility.<br />

This would<br />

take most<br />

of the<br />

traffic of<br />

Church<br />

Street.<br />

6. Re<br />

instate<br />

railway<br />

from<br />

Coalbrookd<br />

ale to<br />

Wellington<br />

via Telford<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Oakengates<br />

. This could<br />

be a light<br />

railway<br />

system<br />

without the<br />

need for<br />

driver. A<br />

single<br />

locomotive<br />

could offer<br />

an approx<br />

30 min<br />

service <strong>and</strong><br />

there is a<br />

siding <strong>and</strong><br />

platform at<br />

the<br />

Wellington<br />

terminus. I<br />

WOULD<br />

SAY THIS<br />

WOULD<br />

BE THE<br />

MOST<br />

IMPORTAN<br />

12 March 2012 Page 23 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

EAST of<br />

Ironbridge Road<br />

as infrastructure<br />

(roads <strong>and</strong> public<br />

transport) already<br />

exists<br />

All the areas<br />

suggested for<br />

development in<br />

Benthall<br />

Ideally the<br />

current<br />

building<br />

l<strong>and</strong> on<br />

Dark Lane<br />

should be<br />

mainly for<br />

community<br />

use –<br />

possibly<br />

with a small<br />

amount of<br />

social<br />

housing/retai<br />

l outlets in<br />

the mix.<br />

Any Plan<br />

should have<br />

an<br />

associated<br />

ENERGY<br />

PLAN with it.<br />

This is the<br />

time to look<br />

at energy<br />

generation in<br />

the area. It is<br />

unrealistic to<br />

think<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong><br />

should import<br />

all its green<br />

energy.<br />

There are<br />

good sites<br />

with above<br />

6m/s wind<br />

around<br />

Brosley.<br />

WIND could<br />

supply 5MW<br />

BIOGASS<br />

could make a<br />

sizeable<br />

contribution<br />

And SOLAR<br />

THERMAL<br />

on new<br />

T SINGLE<br />

INFRASTR<br />

UCTURE<br />

PROJECT.<br />

It should be<br />

anticipated<br />

to<br />

complete it<br />

before<br />

2015 when<br />

the power<br />

station<br />

intends to<br />

close <strong>and</strong><br />

thus any<br />

current<br />

maintenanc<br />

e would<br />

stop <strong>and</strong><br />

disrepair<br />

would set<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

There is a special problem for<br />

Broseley in that there is a<br />

political division that<br />

separates it from Ironbridge.<br />

If we didn’t have Telford <strong>and</strong><br />

Wrekin unitary authority then<br />

Broseley <strong>and</strong> Ironbrdiger<br />

would be a natural unit. This<br />

is even more reason to<br />

develop on the EAST side,<br />

particularly towards<br />

Ironbridge.<br />

One day this boundary will go<br />

<strong>and</strong> Broseley needs to be<br />

ready for this.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 24 of 55<br />

Energy


Settlement Broseley<br />

Mr Les Morris National Grid<br />

houses would<br />

give 50% of<br />

the hot water<br />

requirment<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Area south/ west of Broseley is identified<br />

as a potential development location are<br />

crossed by National Grid’s high voltage<br />

overhead electricity transmission lines:<br />

National Grid does not own the l<strong>and</strong> over<br />

which the overhead lines cross, <strong>and</strong> it<br />

obtains the rights from individual<br />

l<strong>and</strong>owners to place our equipment on<br />

their l<strong>and</strong>. Potential developers of the<br />

sites should be aware that it is National<br />

Grid policy to retain our existing<br />

overhead lines in-situ. Because of the<br />

scale, bulk <strong>and</strong> cost of the transmission<br />

equipment required to operate at 400kV<br />

National Grid only supports proposals for<br />

the relocation of existing high voltage<br />

overhead lines where such proposals<br />

directly facilitate a major development or<br />

infrastructure project of national<br />

importance which has been identified as<br />

such by central government Therefore<br />

we advise developers <strong>and</strong> planning<br />

authorities to take into account the<br />

location <strong>and</strong> nature of existing electricity<br />

transmission equipment when planning<br />

developments.National Grid prefers that<br />

buildings are not built directly beneath its<br />

overhead lines. This is for two reasons,<br />

the amenity of potential occupiers of<br />

properties in the vicinity of lines <strong>and</strong><br />

because National Grid needs quick <strong>and</strong><br />

easy access to carry out maintenance of<br />

its equipment to ensure that it can be<br />

returned to service <strong>and</strong> be available as<br />

part of the national transmission system.<br />

Such access can be difficult to obtain<br />

without inconveniencing <strong>and</strong> disturbing<br />

occupiers <strong>and</strong> residents, particularly<br />

where properties are in close proximity<br />

to overhead lines<br />

12 March 2012 Page 25 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Marc Hourigan Hourigan Connolly Option B Option B Direction: East<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

SHLAA ref BROS<br />

011 should be<br />

reallocated for<br />

open space to<br />

help remedy local<br />

deficiencies. As it<br />

is located centrally<br />

it would be highly<br />

accessible to all<br />

residents<br />

Specific policies<br />

need to be drafted<br />

to deal with care<br />

related<br />

development<br />

(Class C2) given<br />

the aging<br />

population in<br />

many of the<br />

settlements<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Michael Hickson B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Michael Parker Option B Option B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Nicholas Ammerla B C to improve the socio economic<br />

grouping, needs more expensive<br />

property <strong>and</strong> less social housing.<br />

Executive housing<br />

to redress socio<br />

economic balance.<br />

B No<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Patrick Larkin Option B Option B Sports<br />

pitches <strong>and</strong><br />

more<br />

recreational<br />

facilities<br />

for young<br />

people<br />

Broseley: young people's needs Opti Broseley:<br />

affordable housing<br />

& recreational<br />

facilities<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

L<strong>and</strong> at Coalport Rd, further<br />

detailed promotional<br />

information about potential<br />

site supplied<br />

Option B Yes The Avenue, Broseley<br />

12 March 2012 Page 26 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr R L Jones Puts forward a site off Dark<br />

Lane for consideration. Site is:<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Close to town centre<br />

amenities;<br />

would prevent further spread<br />

of town;<br />

Access would require further<br />

work but could incorporate<br />

traffic calming measures on<br />

the approach to the school;<br />

sewage pipe crosses site;<br />

low lying <strong>and</strong> unobtrusive;<br />

poor quality agricultural l<strong>and</strong>;<br />

could provide affordable home<br />

site for local young people.<br />

Happy to discuss further<br />

12 March 2012 Page 27 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr R M Clark 1.The proposed development<br />

on the l<strong>and</strong> between Rough<br />

Lane, Forester Road <strong>and</strong><br />

Pound Lane.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Established ‘Wildlife Location’<br />

<strong>and</strong> adopted by the<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong> Wildlife Trust<br />

Traffic, road safety <strong>and</strong><br />

commuting <strong>issues</strong>;<br />

2. The proposed development<br />

off Coalport Road <strong>and</strong> behind<br />

Coal Close<br />

high pressure underground<br />

Gas mains pipe;<br />

area is populated by disused<br />

mineshafts. This fact is<br />

underscored by active<br />

subsidence in this area <strong>and</strong> is<br />

why the current development<br />

ended where it is now….. At<br />

Forester Road<br />

The attractive thing about Broseley is<br />

that residences do not have to commute<br />

to Telford, Shrewsbury or Bridgnorth for<br />

the day to day necessities. Additional<br />

housing along the scale proposed, will<br />

see Broseley come under the radar of<br />

Supermarkets chains who with their<br />

money <strong>and</strong> influence will establish<br />

themselves in the locality <strong>and</strong> kill off all<br />

the local business <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurial<br />

spirit , putting jobs <strong>and</strong> business at risk<br />

rather than enhance employments<br />

prospects for the local community.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 28 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Richard Freemantl Mr Martin Starbuck Clients own two adjacent sites<br />

between Cobwell Road <strong>and</strong><br />

Bridge Bank in Broseley<br />

Wood (Plan <strong>and</strong> detailed<br />

description provided). Sites<br />

are outside current<br />

development boundary <strong>and</strong><br />

inside Conservation Area -<br />

therefore would not be<br />

permitted under current<br />

policies.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Robin Walker Option A Option A Traffic<br />

lights on<br />

cross roads<br />

More police<br />

on foot<br />

Allotments<br />

Sports Hall<br />

All valued <strong>and</strong><br />

protected<br />

Sports hall<br />

at<br />

Birchmeado<br />

w centre<br />

Reasons for<br />

past planning<br />

refusals are<br />

as relevant<br />

today as they<br />

were in the<br />

past<br />

Please<br />

consider that<br />

the current<br />

committed<br />

housing site<br />

in central<br />

Broseley (90+<br />

homes) has<br />

still to be<br />

taken up by a<br />

housing<br />

developer.<br />

Infill housing development is<br />

characteristic of this area -<br />

existing policy should be<br />

relaxed in future.<br />

Development of client's l<strong>and</strong><br />

would be better than woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

area on nearby Spout Lane<br />

which would generate access<br />

problems. Potential for<br />

planning gain (l<strong>and</strong> at the<br />

bend of Cobwell Road) to<br />

generate parking space for<br />

utility vehicles.<br />

Opti Option A Direction: north<br />

Infill only<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 29 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Roger Tweedale Lioncourt Homes Ltd<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Benthall is<br />

included in the<br />

detailed map for<br />

Broseley.<br />

Development<br />

either at Benthall<br />

or on the edge of<br />

Broseley has the<br />

potential to effect<br />

the setting of the<br />

grade I listed<br />

Benthall Hall.<br />

Although the park<br />

at Benthall was<br />

lost through<br />

mineral extraction<br />

which occurred in<br />

the area until the<br />

1940s, the feel of<br />

a park is being<br />

restored by the<br />

National Trust.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 30 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Scott Morgan<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Hill Top<br />

Farm,Benthall-<br />

West of Broseley:<br />

This area which<br />

extends from<br />

Bridge Road upto<br />

its boundary with<br />

National Trust<br />

l<strong>and</strong> at Benthall<br />

Hall is of high<br />

nature<br />

conservation value<br />

<strong>and</strong> should be<br />

protected. The<br />

area close to<br />

Bridge Road has<br />

numerous large<br />

anthills <strong>and</strong><br />

supports barn owl,<br />

green<br />

woodpecker,<br />

chiffchaff,<br />

whitethroat, housesparrows,<br />

kestrel<br />

etc <strong>and</strong> numerous<br />

butterflies. The<br />

flatter area at the<br />

top of the bank<br />

has a good<br />

population of<br />

common spotted<br />

orchid <strong>and</strong><br />

southern marsh<br />

orchid along with<br />

birds skylark<br />

,whitethroat ,<br />

chiffchaff,<br />

yellowhammer,<br />

kestrel, buzzard<br />

<strong>and</strong> numerous<br />

butterflies. I<br />

believe some of<br />

the l<strong>and</strong> is<br />

maintained under<br />

a stewardship<br />

scheme.<br />

Penn's Meadow,<br />

Broseley:<br />

Is an old hay<br />

12 March 2012 Page 31 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

meadow which<br />

provides a clear<br />

green space<br />

between Broseley<br />

<strong>and</strong> Benthall- in<br />

between Speed's<br />

Lane, Broseley<br />

<strong>and</strong> Bridge Road<br />

<strong>and</strong> should be<br />

protected.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 32 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Stephen Dewhirst Option A Option A I would like<br />

to propose<br />

(site to be<br />

identified –<br />

Crowgate a<br />

possibility):<br />

Community<br />

Forest<br />

Gardening<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Agroforestry<br />

Scheme<br />

Objective<br />

• To<br />

develop a<br />

community<br />

owned <strong>and</strong><br />

managed<br />

multipurpos<br />

e area for<br />

food<br />

production,<br />

skills<br />

developmen<br />

t, fuelwood<br />

production,<br />

recreation<br />

<strong>and</strong> health.<br />

Concept<br />

• An area<br />

of<br />

woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> open<br />

ground,<br />

either<br />

adopted or<br />

planted,<br />

located<br />

close to the<br />

town,<br />

which is<br />

managed<br />

by a<br />

community<br />

group<br />

drawn from<br />

all sections<br />

of society.<br />

• The area<br />

12 March 2012 Page 33 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

is<br />

developed<br />

in such a<br />

way that it<br />

can provide<br />

space for<br />

several of<br />

the<br />

following<br />

activities :-<br />

vegetable<br />

production<br />

production<br />

other<br />

perennial<br />

food<br />

production<br />

se wood<br />

products<br />

including<br />

firewood<br />

<strong>and</strong> timber.<br />

survival<br />

skills (<br />

Forest<br />

Schools)<br />

Schools<br />

Sustainabilit<br />

y Agenda<br />

nal trails<br />

through<br />

woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

(Green<br />

Gym)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Care<br />

provision<br />

through<br />

exercise<br />

trails<br />

permanent<br />

space for<br />

all to enjoy<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

manage<br />

• To<br />

12 March 2012 Page 34 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

replicate<br />

this<br />

concept<br />

close to all<br />

major<br />

towns in<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong><br />

Potential<br />

Partners<br />

• Woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

trust<br />

• National<br />

Trust<br />

• Forestry<br />

Commissio<br />

n<br />

• AONB<br />

• Wildlife<br />

Trust<br />

• Small<br />

Woods<br />

Association<br />

• CARE<br />

Farming<br />

• RSPB<br />

• SCC<br />

• Secondary<br />

Schools<br />

• <strong>and</strong> many<br />

others<br />

The<br />

concept<br />

draws<br />

inspiration<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

practical<br />

experience<br />

from<br />

Robert<br />

Hart’s<br />

Wenlock<br />

Edge<br />

Forest<br />

garden <strong>and</strong><br />

Nepali,<br />

Bolivian,<br />

Ethiopian<br />

<strong>and</strong> Filipino<br />

Forest<br />

Gardener/F<br />

armers.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 35 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

In addition I<br />

would like<br />

to see<br />

Bishop’s<br />

Castle (<strong>and</strong><br />

area) to<br />

become a<br />

centre for<br />

renewable<br />

power<br />

generation,<br />

able to<br />

meet<br />

power<br />

needs<br />

without use<br />

of fossil<br />

fuels,<br />

indeed<br />

become a<br />

net<br />

exporter.<br />

Some, if<br />

not all,<br />

should be<br />

community<br />

owned.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

There are a number of <strong>issues</strong> which<br />

make large scale development in<br />

Broseley undesirable:<br />

Contigusous with Telford <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

different to other towns in <strong>Shropshire</strong>;<br />

Poor transport links to due Severn<br />

Gorge <strong>and</strong> poor quality services;<br />

Additional employment opportunities<br />

limited, so development would generate<br />

additional out-commuting on inadequate<br />

transport infrastructure;<br />

No real prospects of improving transport<br />

infrastructure or public transport services;<br />

Telford more appropriate for additional<br />

development;<br />

High proportion of public sector housing;<br />

Need for low cost housing: over the past<br />

25 years, a number of low cost<br />

properties have been released onto the<br />

market - the fact that these are no<br />

longer regarded as afordable indicates<br />

that the only suitable response would be<br />

rented or shared ownership solutions.<br />

Telford has a large amount of affordable<br />

12 March 2012 Page 36 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

housing available <strong>and</strong> this abrogates to<br />

some extent, the need for additional<br />

housing of this kind in Broseley.<br />

Broseley adjoins the Ironbridge WHS<br />

<strong>and</strong> would have been in the WHS area if<br />

in Telford or if area had been exp<strong>and</strong>ed.<br />

Should therefore be regarded as within<br />

the buffer zone <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>and</strong> type of<br />

development should reflect this.<br />

Only town in the Coalbrookdale coalfield<br />

to retain much of its original character.<br />

Large scale development would be out<br />

of proportion <strong>and</strong> would destroy its<br />

character like the former Telford towns.<br />

Broseley has significant historic<br />

environment interest from the early<br />

industrial revolution - its development<br />

essentially froze from the mid C19th until<br />

the mid C20th. All the potential<br />

development sites illustrated are likely to<br />

contain archaeological remains from<br />

industrial development <strong>and</strong> important<br />

sites such as The Dunge <strong>and</strong> Clay<br />

Meado must not be developed. Other<br />

sites should have a thorough<br />

assessment before development.<br />

Several SHLAA sites highlighted:<br />

Plot A: large visual impact (open area),<br />

not near local amenities, Clay Meadow:<br />

mining history <strong>and</strong> a relic of Broseley's<br />

early C20th water supply, archaeological<br />

evaluation should be undertaken;<br />

Plot B: former coal <strong>and</strong> ironstone mine,<br />

visual impact on Conservation Area,<br />

archaeological evaluation should be<br />

undertaken;<br />

Plot C: unsuitable ground, lower than the<br />

road <strong>and</strong> on marshy ground being the<br />

site of one of the ponds for the<br />

Coneybury Ironworks, archaeological<br />

evaluation should be undertaken, high<br />

visual impact, remote from amenities;<br />

Plot D: Site of former Dunge Tileworks<br />

<strong>and</strong> development would result in loss of<br />

an important archaeological site,<br />

archaeological evaluation should be<br />

undertaken;<br />

Plot E: A large development would have<br />

a significant visual impact;<br />

Plot F: Site of Firey Fields coonected<br />

with mining from the C18th, significant<br />

12 March 2012 Page 37 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

mining remains, archaeological<br />

evaluation should be undertaken;<br />

12 March 2012 Page 38 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr Stuart Oliver Allow individual infill<br />

development on brownfield<br />

Forester Road<br />

Broseley: Map<br />

provided.<br />

Site is currently a<br />

haven for wildlife<br />

including orchids<br />

<strong>and</strong> woodpeckers<br />

Birchmeado<br />

w area:<br />

further<br />

development<br />

of sports<br />

facilities<br />

Tileries<br />

estate inc.<br />

Coalport<br />

Road:<br />

Further<br />

development<br />

in this area<br />

will increase<br />

traffic<br />

volumes<br />

using the<br />

Coalport<br />

Road to<br />

access the<br />

John<br />

Wilkinson<br />

School.<br />

Existing<br />

parents are<br />

forced to<br />

park <strong>and</strong> use<br />

Coalport<br />

Road,<br />

Forester<br />

Road <strong>and</strong><br />

Guest Road<br />

during the<br />

school run<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

additional<br />

housing<br />

would<br />

exacerbate<br />

this. Outcommuting<br />

for work<br />

highly likely,<br />

expecially to<br />

Telford <strong>and</strong><br />

this would<br />

have an<br />

adverse<br />

impact on<br />

traffic on the<br />

Coalport<br />

Road, the<br />

restricted<br />

Opti Existing<br />

infrastructure is<br />

adequate for local<br />

needs<br />

Option A Yes<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 39 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

Coalport<br />

bridge <strong>and</strong><br />

the<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Road<br />

entering the<br />

Gorge.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 40 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mr T Evans Option D Option C Increase in<br />

social<br />

facilities in<br />

centre of<br />

Broseley.<br />

More car<br />

parks near<br />

centre to<br />

encourage<br />

use of<br />

centre<br />

rather than<br />

trips to<br />

Telford<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Affordable Housing:<br />

Affordable housing in rural<br />

areas should only be required<br />

where a local survey has<br />

clearly established a need –<br />

this should be carried out by<br />

the planning authority, not by<br />

the applicants at the time of<br />

the application;<br />

Sustainable Design:<br />

The determination to achieve<br />

sustainable design should not<br />

be at the expense of the<br />

character <strong>and</strong> appearance of<br />

the building reflecting local<br />

architecture;<br />

Developer Contributions:<br />

The current economic<br />

situation shows how<br />

dangerous trying to manage<br />

the supply of housing l<strong>and</strong><br />

can be. Whilst a managed<br />

supply might be the ideal,<br />

practicalities mean that too<br />

rigid, a ‘release’ policy might<br />

Specific policies<br />

should be devised<br />

that will<br />

encourage the<br />

provision of<br />

housing <strong>and</strong> care<br />

accommodation<br />

for elderly persons<br />

NORTH EAST: Site identified<br />

on plan supplied<br />

It is encouraging to see<br />

Jackfield is included on the<br />

Broseley ‘Potential Directions<br />

for Growth’ map. It should<br />

also be remembered that<br />

Jackfield lies partly in Telford,<br />

<strong>and</strong> so is part of an urban<br />

area. The site identified lies in<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong>, but the opposite<br />

side of the road is in Telford<br />

area. Development is<br />

permitted in the Telford part of<br />

Jackfield – in fact directly<br />

opposite the identified site <strong>and</strong><br />

it would be extremely logical<br />

to allow the <strong>Shropshire</strong> side of<br />

Calcutts Lane to be part of a<br />

sustainable settlement, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

surrounded by development.<br />

Jackfield has some local<br />

facilities <strong>and</strong> employment<br />

opportunities<br />

12 March 2012 Page 41 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

Mrs D Parker A A<br />

have a damaging effect that<br />

could lead to a housing<br />

undersupply;<br />

Managing release of housing<br />

l<strong>and</strong>:<br />

These should be more<br />

carefully related to the<br />

additional dem<strong>and</strong>s on<br />

infrastructure etc generated<br />

by the development itself.<br />

They should not be used to<br />

fund a local authority ‘wish<br />

list’ of projects that do not<br />

relate to the proposed<br />

development;<br />

Environmental Networks:<br />

Policies should not be<br />

generate unless<br />

environmental networks are<br />

clearly established, properly<br />

researched <strong>and</strong> requirements<br />

known <strong>and</strong> published<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 42 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs Elaine Newton Tiffany Stables Option C Option C Build<br />

should be<br />

concentrate<br />

d on the<br />

outer area<br />

to take<br />

traffic out<br />

of the<br />

centre.<br />

Dark Lane<br />

needs a<br />

roundabout<br />

taking the<br />

existing<br />

housing<br />

commitmen<br />

t east <strong>and</strong><br />

away from<br />

the school<br />

<strong>and</strong> the<br />

High Street<br />

<strong>and</strong> onto<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Road<br />

below the<br />

cemetery.<br />

This will<br />

help to<br />

slow<br />

existing<br />

speeding<br />

traffic. If<br />

Lodge<br />

Lane is<br />

built on<br />

(which is<br />

poor quality<br />

l<strong>and</strong>) again<br />

a<br />

roundabout<br />

on Benthall<br />

Lane would<br />

be needed<br />

to slow <strong>and</strong><br />

accommoda<br />

te traffic.<br />

East Protect Penns<br />

Meadow, Haycop<br />

(east of Darl Lane)<br />

Needs l<strong>and</strong><br />

allocation<br />

for potential<br />

future<br />

expansion<br />

Increase<br />

tourism,<br />

increase off<br />

road access<br />

for walkers,<br />

With the<br />

arrival of<br />

Corfields to<br />

Benthall,<br />

some very<br />

Broseley: affordable housing Opti Option C Option C No East: Ironbridge Road<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

No - no local<br />

work either<br />

casual or<br />

otherwise<br />

Any new development should<br />

be to the highest sustainable<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards. Local councillors<br />

should look favourably at<br />

local regeneration schemes<br />

Leisure industry<br />

needs to be<br />

compatible with<br />

any planning<br />

programmes<br />

Site submitted for<br />

consideration through agent<br />

Tony Rowl<strong>and</strong>: added to GIS:<br />

BROS 025/10 <strong>and</strong> BROS<br />

026/10<br />

With the development of Corfields at<br />

Benthall, foreign lorries (usually lost) are<br />

coming into the area more. Horses have<br />

been hit twice on the road by vehicles<br />

going too fast to stop. A horse <strong>and</strong> rider<br />

12 March 2012 Page 43 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

cyclists,<br />

horse riders,<br />

development<br />

of selfcatering<br />

units<br />

local<br />

affordable<br />

housing for<br />

workers <strong>and</strong><br />

start up<br />

industrial<br />

units,<br />

possibly as<br />

live-work<br />

units:<br />

workshop<br />

with upstairs<br />

flat<br />

recently had problems due to a speeding<br />

low loader. Consideration must be given<br />

to off road alternative routes within this<br />

area for both horse riders <strong>and</strong> other non<br />

motorised modes. A 12 ft strip of l<strong>and</strong><br />

around the boundary of Corfield, also to<br />

the rear of the house opposite the<br />

nursery. If the Estate l<strong>and</strong> is to go for<br />

building: i.e. Lodge Lane, then more off<br />

road facilities need to be made available.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 44 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs Fiona Gibbs<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

3 areas adjacent<br />

to Bridgnorth<br />

Road:<br />

This area (known<br />

locally as the Fiery<br />

Fields) is used a<br />

lot by local people,<br />

especially<br />

children. Because<br />

it is away from<br />

roads it is a safe<br />

place to play <strong>and</strong><br />

the steep slopes<br />

make it a great<br />

place for<br />

sledging. It is<br />

very attractive with<br />

mature trees <strong>and</strong><br />

the public<br />

footpaths crisscrossing<br />

it make it<br />

popular for<br />

walking. These<br />

paths, together<br />

with the<br />

permissive path<br />

past the deerleap<br />

<strong>and</strong> lodge lane<br />

form an ideal<br />

circular walk.<br />

It also has a lot of<br />

historical interest,<br />

with the remains<br />

of pre-industrial<br />

coal mining <strong>and</strong> a<br />

roman road.<br />

The area around<br />

Bridgnorth Road<br />

has already been<br />

extensively<br />

developed <strong>and</strong> it<br />

would be a great<br />

shame to lose this<br />

well loved open<br />

space facility.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 45 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs Frances Cooper Option B Option C Safe<br />

footway up<br />

full length<br />

of<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Road <strong>and</strong><br />

safe<br />

crossing to<br />

link<br />

Jackfield<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Broseley<br />

Cockshot lane <strong>and</strong><br />

duke street plots -<br />

Re-use any<br />

derelict premises.<br />

Natural areas<br />

between Dark<br />

Lane <strong>and</strong><br />

Ironbridge road<br />

including Haycop<br />

nature reserve<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong> at<br />

fringe of Willey<br />

Leisure<br />

facilities<br />

esp.<br />

sportscentr<br />

e <strong>and</strong> all<br />

weather<br />

pitches.<br />

Clay soil<br />

type makes<br />

local<br />

pitches<br />

very poor in<br />

winter.<br />

No proper<br />

sports<br />

facilities<br />

accessible<br />

without trip<br />

to Madeley<br />

, Much<br />

Wenlock or<br />

Bridgnorth,<br />

which are<br />

not well<br />

served by<br />

buses, so<br />

not good<br />

for young<br />

people or<br />

non-drivers<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

south east <strong>and</strong> east.<br />

My family <strong>and</strong> I use school, shops <strong>and</strong><br />

all other services in Broseley area, walk<br />

<strong>and</strong> cycle in locality <strong>and</strong> use leisure<br />

facilities where these exist. Therefore<br />

although live just outside area, we have<br />

many interests within it. We have lived<br />

there in the past <strong>and</strong> are considering<br />

moving back there if suitable house<br />

12 March 2012 Page 46 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

Park estate,<br />

bordering<br />

Bridgnorth road<br />

Mrs Joan Griffiths Option B Recreation<br />

facilities<br />

are a<br />

priority in a<br />

town of<br />

over 6000,<br />

decent<br />

community<br />

centre<br />

Coalport Rd,<br />

Rough Lane,<br />

Pound Lane: site<br />

marked P on<br />

annotated map.<br />

This site already<br />

has many homes,<br />

poor road access<br />

for more traffic<br />

from Rough /<br />

Pound Lane. Site<br />

designated by<br />

SWT.<br />

Archaeology<br />

interest - many<br />

former pits, local<br />

subsidence <strong>and</strong><br />

building stopped<br />

for that reason.<br />

More detailed<br />

description of<br />

infrastructure <strong>and</strong><br />

environmental<br />

Highlights<br />

existing<br />

housing<br />

commitment<br />

on Dark<br />

Lane for 95<br />

homes /<br />

recreation /<br />

community<br />

centre<br />

Affordable<br />

housing<br />

would be<br />

acceptable,<br />

perhaps on<br />

the Dark<br />

Lane field, for<br />

the young<br />

people of the<br />

town. Family<br />

have lived<br />

here since<br />

1550 <strong>and</strong><br />

gr<strong>and</strong>children<br />

are<br />

the first to<br />

have to live in<br />

Telford<br />

because the<br />

cost of<br />

housing is<br />

too high<br />

Affordable homes<br />

for young people,<br />

recreational<br />

facilities,<br />

community centre<br />

Option B<br />

available to buy.<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs S Morris A B Adequate<br />

play area<br />

alongside<br />

updated<br />

childrens<br />

on<br />

Birchmeado<br />

w.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Form quite hard to underst<strong>and</strong> - there is<br />

surely a need for information not known<br />

to ordinary residents to send an<br />

accurate picture of what we want / need<br />

in our own areas. Despite the need for<br />

affordable homes, there is also a need<br />

for unspoilt habitat in our countryside -<br />

the Rough / Pound Lane / Coalport Rd<br />

area has many pools in wet weather <strong>and</strong><br />

bad drainage.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 47 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs Susan Lyon Option A Little<br />

developmen<br />

t is needed.<br />

Continued<br />

improveme<br />

nt to the<br />

Birchmeado<br />

w Social<br />

Club <strong>and</strong><br />

sports /<br />

play area is<br />

needed;<br />

Cycle<br />

paths to<br />

link up with<br />

excellent<br />

start made<br />

in<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Gorge /<br />

Jackfield<br />

Continued<br />

maintenance of<br />

Birchmeadow<br />

Social / Sports<br />

centre<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

The Tileries: Field<br />

between Rough<br />

Lane / Forester Rd<br />

/ Pound Lane -<br />

protect for nature<br />

value <strong>and</strong> prevent<br />

further fringe<br />

development of<br />

village<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Option A Yes Objects to potential<br />

development of Tilley Field<br />

area bounded by Forester Rd,<br />

Rough Lane, Coalport Rd <strong>and</strong><br />

Pound Lane:<br />

Traffic <strong>issues</strong>;<br />

Existing schools at capacity;<br />

Coalport bridge weak;<br />

l<strong>and</strong> is valuable meadow<br />

habitat with significant<br />

biodiversity (species list<br />

provided);<br />

Natural pools <strong>and</strong> drainage<br />

<strong>issues</strong>;<br />

Historic interest - mining<br />

hazards;<br />

Development on the fringes of<br />

Broseley is undesirable. Many<br />

new houses have not sold<br />

nearby. Broseley is only a<br />

small village <strong>and</strong> is unsuitable<br />

for increased housing<br />

Ms Alison Shipley Concerned about potential<br />

development l<strong>and</strong> behind my<br />

home.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> discounted in the past<br />

because of electricity pylons,<br />

poor drainage, gas main <strong>and</strong><br />

traffic/access <strong>issues</strong>.<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 48 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Ms Debra Kynaston North West - L<strong>and</strong> to the east<br />

of Bridge Road<br />

as is marked ‘G’ on the<br />

attached copy map<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

Proposed<br />

residential<br />

development<br />

site: l<strong>and</strong><br />

lying to the<br />

south of the<br />

Belmont,<br />

Bridge Road,<br />

Benthall,<br />

Broseley.<br />

Please see<br />

the attached<br />

Title Plan<br />

indicating the<br />

extent of the<br />

l<strong>and</strong><br />

proposed<br />

edged red,<br />

<strong>and</strong> also the<br />

extract of the<br />

Broseley<br />

Inset to the<br />

Bridgnorth<br />

Local Plan<br />

Proposals<br />

Map,<br />

indicating the<br />

extent of the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> shaded<br />

pink.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 49 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Ms Julie Newton Option A Public<br />

transport is<br />

very poor -<br />

more<br />

buses are<br />

needed<br />

North of Cockshut<br />

Lane - adjacent to<br />

the existing factory<br />

Between Rough<br />

Lane <strong>and</strong> Pound<br />

Lane:<br />

Protect for nature<br />

value;<br />

The site is<br />

registered for its<br />

historic interest in<br />

the SMR<br />

Development<br />

in Broseley<br />

should be<br />

near the<br />

centre <strong>and</strong><br />

amenities<br />

rather than<br />

becoming<br />

more<br />

starggling<br />

with many<br />

more using<br />

cars just to<br />

travel to<br />

shops or<br />

other faciliites<br />

Some other<br />

places (e.g.<br />

Shifnal) are<br />

better placed<br />

for expansion<br />

in terms of<br />

their<br />

accessibility<br />

by road or rail.<br />

Public Transport Option B Yes Direction: North & South<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

In both cases keeping west of<br />

the Ironbridge Road to keep<br />

housing near the centre of the<br />

town.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 50 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Ms T Barrett Broseley TC Option A Option C: s Improved<br />

public<br />

transport,<br />

including<br />

better<br />

connections<br />

to the local<br />

secondary<br />

schools.<br />

As A2:<br />

The town needs<br />

employment, but<br />

employment<br />

development<br />

would be affected<br />

by the constraints<br />

of the road<br />

network.<br />

The Town Council<br />

considers that the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> to the north of<br />

Cockshutt Lane,<br />

which is already<br />

used for<br />

commercial<br />

purposes, would<br />

be suitable for<br />

employment<br />

development. The<br />

Council objects to<br />

Birchmeadow<br />

Park, including the<br />

Cockshutt mound<br />

The Memorial<br />

Garden in the<br />

High Street<br />

The Haycop (site<br />

of the Down Well<br />

between Dark<br />

Lane <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Ironbridge Road)<br />

Penn’s Meadow in<br />

Speed’s Lane<br />

The Jitties in<br />

Broseley Wood<br />

Maypole Green on<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Road/Maypole<br />

Road<br />

All primary school<br />

playing fields<br />

The Cricket Club<br />

field off<br />

Cemetery<br />

The Council<br />

has<br />

identified a<br />

need for the<br />

future<br />

extension of<br />

the<br />

Cemetery in<br />

Ironbridge<br />

Road, to the<br />

south of the<br />

current<br />

Cemetery<br />

boundary.<br />

Please note<br />

that the<br />

existing<br />

Cemetery<br />

<strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

around it is<br />

shown as<br />

Relative to its<br />

population<br />

Broseley<br />

fares very<br />

poorly for<br />

facilities <strong>and</strong><br />

public<br />

transport.<br />

Improved<br />

community<br />

centres<br />

<strong>and</strong> halls.<br />

An office<br />

base with<br />

full facilities<br />

for the<br />

police<br />

within the<br />

town.<br />

Protection<br />

of the<br />

Jitties from<br />

encroachm<br />

ent.<br />

As A3:<br />

Improved public<br />

transport,<br />

including better<br />

connections to the<br />

local secondary<br />

schools.<br />

Improved<br />

community<br />

centres <strong>and</strong> halls.<br />

An office base<br />

with full facilities<br />

for the police<br />

within the town.<br />

Protection of the<br />

Jitties from<br />

encroachment.<br />

There is a need for more<br />

homes which first time buyers<br />

can afford, as well as social<br />

housing.<br />

Protection of the<br />

heritage sites <strong>and</strong><br />

for the Ironbridge<br />

Gorge World<br />

Heritage Site to<br />

be extended to<br />

include Broseley.<br />

Option D: Yes South:<br />

As B4 <strong>and</strong> 5:<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

The Council would propose<br />

the piece of l<strong>and</strong> behind the<br />

Foresters Arms on Avenue<br />

Road for such a<br />

development. This is within<br />

walking distance of the town<br />

centre, close to one of the<br />

schools <strong>and</strong> a local shop.<br />

A1: The maximum of 200 homes should<br />

include the outst<strong>and</strong>ing 100+ which are<br />

already allocated in the Bridgnorth<br />

District Local Plan (policy BRO 1) or<br />

have planning permission, which has not<br />

yet been implemented. This<br />

development should be subject to<br />

investment in the infrastructure <strong>and</strong><br />

facilities that the town would need to<br />

support such an increase in population.<br />

A2: The town needs employment, but<br />

employment development would be<br />

affected by the constraints of the road<br />

network. The Town Council considers<br />

that the l<strong>and</strong> to the north of Cockshutt<br />

Lane, which is already used for<br />

commercial purposes, would be suitable<br />

for employment development. The<br />

Council objects to this l<strong>and</strong> being used<br />

for residential development.<br />

B4: The Council would propose the<br />

12 March 2012 Page 51 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

this l<strong>and</strong> being<br />

used for<br />

residential<br />

Woodl<strong>and</strong>s Road<br />

The Bowling<br />

Green at the<br />

Social Club in the<br />

High Street<br />

The green space<br />

on the Tileries<br />

estate<br />

The Council would<br />

like to retain <strong>and</strong><br />

enhance all<br />

existing green<br />

leisure facilities<br />

potential<br />

development<br />

l<strong>and</strong> on the<br />

map in the<br />

leaflet.<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Prof Andrew Pollard Option C Option B<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

piece of l<strong>and</strong> behind the Foresters Arms<br />

on Avenue Road for such a<br />

development. This is within walking<br />

distance of the town centre, close to one<br />

of the schools <strong>and</strong> a local shop.<br />

12 March 2012 Page 52 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Rev Michael Pope Option A Option E: Ni Any<br />

developmen<br />

t in<br />

Broseleywo<br />

uld require<br />

a vast<br />

improveme<br />

nt in<br />

infrastructur<br />

e. Road<br />

access<br />

improveme<br />

nts<br />

required,<br />

especially<br />

for large<br />

vehicles<br />

<strong>and</strong> to<br />

accommoda<br />

te extra<br />

traffic<br />

volumes.<br />

High St is<br />

already<br />

congested.<br />

Secondary<br />

school<br />

children<br />

bussed out<br />

of town -<br />

additional<br />

developmen<br />

t would add<br />

to this<br />

burden.<br />

Drainage<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

sewerage<br />

would need<br />

updating<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

has become a<br />

dormitory town.<br />

Industrial sites in<br />

nearby Telford<br />

The Haycop<br />

nature<br />

conservation area<br />

annotated on map<br />

The existing<br />

allocated site<br />

off Dark Lane<br />

is adjacent to<br />

the town's<br />

Conservation<br />

Area <strong>and</strong> its<br />

development<br />

would be<br />

detrimental to<br />

the character<br />

Small infill sites<br />

12 March 2012 Page 53 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

of the historic<br />

core of the<br />

town <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the visual<br />

<strong>and</strong> physical<br />

characteristic<br />

s of the area.<br />

There are<br />

potentially<br />

smaller, less<br />

prominent<br />

sites in <strong>and</strong><br />

around the<br />

town which<br />

would<br />

generate less<br />

impact.<br />

Local wisdom<br />

suggests that<br />

this site is<br />

unsuitabel for<br />

development<br />

due to mining<br />

instability <strong>and</strong><br />

the presence<br />

of former<br />

mine entries.<br />

The site<br />

overlies the<br />

Broseley<br />

Fault <strong>and</strong><br />

properties<br />

nearby have<br />

suffered from<br />

subsidence.<br />

The site is an<br />

important<br />

green area<br />

<strong>and</strong> should<br />

not be<br />

sacrificed in<br />

the rush to<br />

meet<br />

development<br />

targets <strong>and</strong><br />

instead<br />

should be<br />

protected for<br />

present <strong>and</strong><br />

future<br />

generations<br />

12 March 2012 Page 54 of 55


Settlement Broseley<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Sally Collin Kemp Valley Group Option A Option A<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

CUSNAME ORG A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6<br />

Mrs Frances Cooper Range of sizes <strong>and</strong> types to<br />

keep community diverse. This<br />

whole village should be in<br />

<strong>Shropshire</strong>, not part inTelford<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wrekin<br />

Opti Village hall<br />

replacement<br />

Basic sports<br />

provision<br />

Safer pedestrian<br />

access to Broseley<br />

Option B No<br />

B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 C1 C2 Other<br />

12 March 2012 Page 55 of 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!